Author Topic: Icon Range  (Read 730 times)

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2009, 06:34:01 AM »
How many of you have actually tried shorter icon ranges in an arena environment?  The AvA is a poor test because there are so few people there.

Based on the reasons most of you are giving against shorter icon ranges, I can tell that the number is close to zero.  This is not to say that there aren't good reasons for keeping icons as they are, but the actual result of shortening icon ranges is not what you think.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2009, 07:06:33 AM »
Come fly an FSO tour, it has 3k icon range.

Fact is there is no escaping if there are a group of enemy cons around.

Being more particular what fights you dive into will help.
As will scanning the skys more often as your in that furball.

SA is the key, not changing icon range.

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10196
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #17 on: October 26, 2009, 09:05:45 AM »
I would prefer no change on the icon range.
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #18 on: October 26, 2009, 09:21:58 AM »
A shorter icon range HELPS the picker not the other way around.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2009, 09:27:24 AM »
More a priori opinions...
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #20 on: October 26, 2009, 09:42:45 AM »
How many of you have actually tried shorter icon ranges in an arena environment?  The AvA is a poor test because there are so few people there.

Based on the reasons most of you are giving against shorter icon ranges, I can tell that the number is close to zero.  This is not to say that there aren't good reasons for keeping icons as they are, but the actual result of shortening icon ranges is not what you think.
My example was from the MA when icon ranges got messed up for a short time.  So yes, yes I have.

I also spent a goodly amount of time in the AvA.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #21 on: October 26, 2009, 01:38:26 PM »
Ok, here's my conclusion based on many hours of dogfight servers in Il-2 with ~40 people on the server, concentrated in one general area of the map.  Icon ranges can vary from none for enemies, to black icons out to 3km for enemies (the black color makes them a little less obvious).

My first observation is that it does not make cherry-picking easier.  The cherry-picker's M.O. is to target the highest bandits first.  The highest bandits are most often others who are trying to cherry pick.  Therefore, any gain in stealth with short icons is balanced out by the greater risk of being cherry-picked while trying to cherry-pick.  Experience has taught me that longer icon ranges generally afford me greater certainty about when it is safe to cherry-pick, so I can devote more of my attention to my targets who might also be more aware of my presence.  In any case, the net difficulty change of cherry-picking is somewhere close to zero.

My second observation is that it is easier to get bounced with short icons if you do not compensate with more frequent scanning of the airspace around you.  If you're used to scanning once every 10 seconds, and the icon range is cut in half, you need to scan every 5 seconds to have the same degree of SA.

My third observation, and something which no one else has touched on yet, is the contribution of icon ranges to furball dynamics.  Generally, longer icon ranges tend to spread out fights simply because enemies at greater ranges are readily visible.  You think more carefully about jumping into a lower furball when you can see enemies 5km out.  You weigh the enjoyment and utility of the close fight with the enjoyment and utility of fighting the enemies who are a little further away.  When all you see are some dots in the distance, human behavior tends toward the immediate; you target the bandit you can see.  Short icon ranges have the unfortunate consequence of coagulating fights, where the annoying tendency to gang-up 3 or 4 to 1 on the nearest bandit is amplified.  I think we can agree that this is the last thing AH needs.

The aspects of surprise and stealth are what make limited icons enjoyable and good for scenarios/FSOs, etc.  The loss of SA is ideally compensated for with good squadron communication, and a knowledge of where friendly units should or should not be operating (this is one of the reasons why teamwork is frequently the deciding factor in scenario play, and not individual skill).  Greater SA allows for more commitment to a fight and the goal of shooting down an enemy aircraft.  Greater SA also means a lower implied risk that comes with less airspeed and less altitude.  So longer icon ranges encourage the raging low altitude furballs that AH is known for because they make SA less expensive.  If icon ranges were made shorter, some fighting styles would become less successful, namely those that depend on the cheap SA that current icon ranges afford, e.g. the lawn-mowing furballer.

For my part, although I often deride main arena gameplay, I do not put any blame on icon ranges.  I like that their most important effect in a chaotic arena is to keep fights spaced out, and to give a little motivation for engaging the bandit who is a little further away than the one who's already fighting a friendly right in front of you.  I've tried online air combat in arena environments that have no icons at all, icons for friendlies only, icons out to 3km, and what AH offers, and I believe that for a free-for-all arena what AH offers is best.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #22 on: October 26, 2009, 03:06:46 PM »
3000 yards is about 2.7 km


Any fighter pilot unable to spot a con at this distance should die merciless :)

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #23 on: October 26, 2009, 09:53:16 PM »
I think the 6k icons are a good thing, but instead of listing the exact aircraft, I'd wish for a simple "FTR", or "Bmbr", etc.  Once in to a distance of 2-3k, THEN show the make of the aircraft.  I think the 6k distance for the ID badge is too close.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2009, 10:25:46 PM »
I think the 6k icons are a good thing, but instead of listing the exact aircraft, I'd wish for a simple "FTR", or "Bmbr", etc.  Once in to a distance of 2-3k, THEN show the make of the aircraft.  I think the 6k distance for the ID badge is too close.
That would be reasonable.  I just want to know if it is friendly or hostile so I don't chase things endlessly.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #25 on: October 27, 2009, 06:52:51 AM »
Actually at long range I'd be happy with just the country symbol.

Keep it small, easy to miss, but there.

Offline maddafinga

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1400
      • The Musketeers Squadron
Re: Icon Range
« Reply #26 on: October 27, 2009, 07:13:26 AM »
The raison d'etre of the MA is to promote dogfighting.

Would making it harder to find the enemy help to do this?

I have to admit, I enjoyed the post-evil con mission arena with no dar but I also noticed that Blue was the new Orange.


wrongway

Man I hated that no dar time.  It was just hit or miss to find a fight.  A base would be flashing, you'd go there and it might be one plane, it might be a dozen.  Much too much work to find a good fight, IMO.  I don't necessarily need dar icons, (though they do help in a base defence, when dar is still up) but I depend on the dar bars to find out where the bad guys are. 
madda
The Musketeers Squadron
http://www.musketeers.org/
When the Dude is recognized in the World, Undudeness is seen everywhere... Dude De Ching
http://dudeism.com/tao/