Author Topic: Rockets  (Read 400 times)

Offline Suave1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Rockets
« on: September 05, 2000, 01:39:00 PM »
I saw some film footage yesterday of typhoons raising hell at Falaise . The explosions from the rockets were pretty hellish . That made me think about their effectiveness in AH . One hit from one of those 60lb rockets should be enough to kill a tank . After all a 7lb panzerschreck rocket could penetrate 230mm of armor .

[This message has been edited by Suave1 (edited 09-05-2000).]

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Rockets
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2000, 01:59:00 PM »
Heh, bombs and rockets have virtually non-existent blast damage. True, a 1k bomb will now kill a panzer if it hits it 1mm off (but ONLY 1 mm off target.. a little more and its just pinhata shrapnel and thud-like noise for the happy tank crews).... but put a 1k bomb 1mm off a fuel tank.. and it still stands LOL.

Add blast effect to the A/G weapons and this game will rock even more.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Rockets
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2000, 02:48:00 PM »
PanzerSchrek
88mm , 7.25 lb..
Penetration.....
100mm

Offline RAM

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Rockets
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2000, 02:51:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo:
PanzerSchrek
88mm , 7.25 lb..
Penetration.....
100mm

Clearly overmodelled

 


Offline Suave1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Rockets
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2000, 03:26:00 PM »
100mm penetration ? Where did you get that info ? Even at a 60 degree angle it could penetrate 160mm .

Offline miko2d

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3177
Rockets
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2000, 03:17:00 PM »
 Weren't they (PanzerSchrek) directed blast weapons as opposed to regular HE rockets?

Offline Suave1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Rockets
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2000, 04:32:00 PM »
yep

Offline Jigster

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 107
      • http://www.33rd.org
Rockets
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2000, 05:03:00 PM »
If "Random crew abandonment" was modeled it would solve alot of problems  

- Jig

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Rockets
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2000, 05:19:00 PM »
Ian Hoggs Infantry weapons of WW2.
100 seems abit low to me too but its sure closer then 940....


Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6558
      • Aces High Events
Rockets
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2000, 06:00:00 PM »
I thought "random crew abandonment" was hitting .ef as soon as a F4U-1C showed up.  
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

edward

  • Guest
Rockets
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2000, 01:50:00 AM »
A small shaped charge can penetrate 200-400 or armor steel (1.5-2.2kg), a 60 lb open detonation prolly wouldnt do much to frontal armor , there's a big diff. in 30,000fps jet stream of gas and metal from a shaped charge and the expansion of an open explosion at 20,000fps


[This message has been edited by edward (edited 09-08-2000).]

Offline Suave1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Rockets
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2000, 08:02:00 AM »
Your getting me all sexed up talking like that edward .