Author Topic: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test  (Read 1841 times)

Offline Ex-jazz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2010, 05:04:07 AM »
Nice tool Ex-jazz, I just tried it out.

On the first run I got this error:

WindowsError: [Error 3] The system cannot find the path specified: 'C:\\AHFsearch\\AHFsearch\\ahiiterr/*.*'

I then copied my ahiiterr-folder to the specified path, and then the tool worked as it should.

It seems the path is hardcoded somewhere?


Hi

Thank you for your feedback.

Please, move whole AHFsearch folder to the Aces High\films folder. This should fix the problem.

In some error cases tools is creating a AHFsearch20.exe.log file for the error details. You can open it with Notepad.

Offline Ex-jazz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2010, 05:34:40 PM »
Hi

Any other takers?

You mean it will search the text buffer? And the user-names inside the film? And the terrain? Wow.... AWESOME. I'll make sure I try this out when I get the chance.


Offline steely07

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1842
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #17 on: December 05, 2010, 12:05:06 AM »
Works a treat Sir, very nice work!

Salute

Steely
Aces High, Wing Commander, Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group: www.dickweedhbg.com

FSO Films : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFs6CAXBQoVBctljybD65fA?view_as=subscriber

Offline TUK

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1360
      • 13MPG
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #18 on: December 05, 2010, 03:54:11 PM »
I'm gonna need the Idiot version I think...
CO WD40 (FSO)
Death From Above (DFA) - Main Arena




Offline Ex-jazz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #19 on: December 05, 2010, 05:34:32 PM »
I'm gonna need the Idiot version I think...
(Image removed from quote.)

 Please, specify a bit your problem :)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23868
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #20 on: December 06, 2010, 06:46:37 AM »
Program works fine here... after I realized that I hadn't filled out the "subdirectories" and "match with all strings" fields. I guess that could happen to some more folks, so I would propose to add something making more clear that these fields are mandatory. ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Tec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #21 on: December 09, 2010, 11:53:45 AM »
Quick question.  If I use this to search for something will my computer be busy for hours processing or does it run rather fast?  How does it work?  If it has to actually load all the films through the film viewer I think my machine will catch fire.
To each their pwn.
K$22L7AoH

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23868
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #22 on: December 09, 2010, 03:06:22 PM »
Quick question.  If I use this to search for something will my computer be busy for hours processing or does it run rather fast?  How does it work?  If it has to actually load all the films through the film viewer I think my machine will catch fire.


It does not use the film viewer at all. It's scanning the raw .ahf files and presents you a list with all films that match your search criteria.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Tec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1738
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #23 on: December 09, 2010, 04:00:31 PM »
Nice I will give it a try then.
To each their pwn.
K$22L7AoH

Offline Ex-jazz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
The .ahf search 2.0
« Reply #24 on: December 21, 2010, 02:09:50 PM »
Hi

Any user feedback out there?


Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: The .ahf search 2.0: A public menu test
« Reply #25 on: April 15, 2011, 12:19:29 AM »
Works great.   I would add something to (unless I missed it already present) dump the positive match list to a text file.  Some file details would be useful too, e.g. "date modified"  either in the results list or in such a text dump.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2011, 12:45:43 AM by moot »
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you