Author Topic: Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?  (Read 396 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« on: September 27, 2001, 07:09:00 PM »
I know that it suffers from the 1-ping-engine-dead-bug. HiTech has said that that is fixed in 1.08 already.

It seems to me that it is a bit fragile. I occasionally have one hold together for me, but usually they break quickly.

Is there anything else?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2001, 07:15:00 PM »
I've heard him talk about it (well, figuratively speaking, of course).

-1 ping engine bug
-1 ping elevator
-something about flaps causing an accelerated stall/spin if they are deployed under a G load.

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2001, 07:46:00 PM »
Damage model (takes only 3 .50 cal shots to blow a wing off for example).

Nose guns dont SEEM to hit as hard as they should (I need the same amount of pings to kill an enemy fiter in a P-51B as I would in a P-38's .50's WITH a 20mm cannon hitting at d400 or less). Also, since they are nose guns, they should be hitting at convergence at any range. Hitting a fighter at d300 is NOT even close as hitting one at d700.Takes 4 times the hits at d700 than at d300 to even do any damage to an enemy fiter. Very odd considering that if ONE gun hits, all 4 .50's should hit with it.

Dive flaps. Only give 5% or less y-axis control in AH. They should pull the nose up at 3g's (38 pilots actually had to push the wheel down significantly just to keep the plane on the dive...the faster in the dive, the more force it was needed) if the dive flaps are deployed at high speeds (400mph+?), if the flaps were deployed before the dive (before it reached high speed) it would not exhibit the nose up force, but would instead prevent the nose from "tucking under" (which was THE danger in compression...well, after hitting the ground that is), which is sort of what the dive flaps in AH do now. Heck in AH its far more effective to trim the elevator up to pull up from a 500mph compression than using the dive flaps!

I sent Pyro a 5 meg e-mail with info on this behaviour. Dunno if he received it or not.

Deploying or retracting flaps under g's will instantly snap roll your plane faster than a horny FW190. Fight any 38, you will see it enter that bs spin all the time if the fight is at 250mph or less. Never have I read about the 38 doing this. Its a SERIOUS problem if it really happened, you'd think it wouldve been mentioned somewhere. It feels almost as if 1 flap deployed before the other one, when I get one of my flaps shot out and I lower the remaining one when under g's it does the same thing. Coincidence? Dunno. Its the equivalent of the nasty bug spin the F6F has imo.

And I still want a 38J   :) GREEEN MEAN MACHINE!

[ 09-27-2001: Message edited by: Tac ]

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2001, 09:31:00 PM »
Quote
Damage model (takes only 3 .50 cal shots to blow a wing off for example).

Yeah, that sounds too fragile to me.  The P-38 isn't the only aircraft with this problem though. 12 50 cal hits can take the Lanc's wing off.  Somebody posted that according a a German ace it took 7 hits with a 30mm cannon to blow a B-17's wing off.

IMO, wings come off too easily in AH.  It sounds like the P-38 is bitten harder than others by this problem.

 
Quote
Nose guns dont SEEM to hit as hard as they should (I need the same amount of pings to kill an enemy fiter in a P-51B as I would in a P-38's .50's WITH a 20mm cannon hitting at d400 or less). Also, since they are nose guns, they should be hitting at convergence at any range. Hitting a fighter at d300 is NOT even close as hitting one at d700.Takes 4 times the hits at d700 than at d300 to even do any damage to an enemy fiter. Very odd considering that if ONE gun hits, all 4 .50's should hit with it.

Yes, I would wxpect them to hit hard, especially due to how concentrated they are. I don't have enough time in the P-38 to really comment on this, but the guns seem to do the trick to me.  It sounds like you've done some objective tests with it though, correct?

 
Quote
Dive flaps. Only give 5% or less y-axis control in AH. They should pull the nose up at 3g's (38 pilots actually had to push the wheel down significantly just to keep the plane on the dive...the faster in the dive, the more force it was needed) if the dive flaps are deployed at high speeds (400mph+?), if the flaps were deployed before the dive (before it reached high speed) it would not exhibit the nose up force, but would instead prevent the nose from "tucking under" (which was THE danger in compression...well, after hitting the ground that is), which is sort of what the dive flaps in AH do now. Heck in AH its far more effective to trim the elevator up to pull up from a 500mph compression than using the dive flaps!

I seem to recal something about flap or dive flap modeling being changed in 1.08.  Hopefully there is a fix for it.

 
Quote
Deploying or retracting flaps under g's will instantly snap roll your plane faster than a horny FW190. Fight any 38, you will see it enter that bs spin all the time if the fight is at 250mph or less. Never have I read about the 38 doing this. Its a SERIOUS problem if it really happened, you'd think it wouldve been mentioned somewhere. It feels almost as if 1 flap deployed before the other one, when I get one of my flaps shot out and I lower the remaining one when under g's it does the same thing. Coincidence? Dunno. Its the equivalent of the nasty bug spin the F6F has imo.

It would be nice to have the FM correct in this regard.

 
Quote
And I still want a 38J  :)  GREEEN MEAN MACHINE!

Yes, a couple of earlier P-38s would be nice.  Say, a J and an F.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline pdog_109

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2001, 10:02:00 PM »
I find the p38 one of the easiest to kill planes. Every time i see one below me, thats who im going for. Its big- easy to hit and most ppl don't know how to fly it. Its not very fast and i can catch it, or run away in a 205.

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2001, 11:39:00 PM »
"I seem to recal something about flap or dive flap modeling being changed in 1.08"

Really? I hope its true on BOTH accounts  :)

Objective tests? You can say that. 5 months of the same dung qualify? *G*. Besides, all you need to do is hose a con at d700 and see how many sprites you see before it pops and compare it with how many you see at d300 or so. IF the nose guns really had the convergence of nose guns youd have the same amount of lead hitting  at both ranges (with no real dispersion at range according to Widewing). The d700 con in almost all cases absorbs 4X the amount of pings and in many, many, cases, flies away undamaged or with a small leak (aka, no significant damage). Even at close range the amount of lead I have to put into a con is no different than the one a B-pony has to put. So the nose gun package , for all i've seen, is not doing the trick. And im not bringing the 20mm into the picture yet.

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2001, 11:53:00 PM »
I don't think that the .50in round would have near the same hitting power at 700 yards as it does at 300 yards. This seems to be what you think?

Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2001, 06:53:00 AM »
And to add to what Juzz said...

Even if the nose guns have less of a convergence factor, that does not mean that they are immune to dispersion factors. So basically just because you see one MG "ping" hit does not mean that other 3 should also at the same time.

Each bullet is modeled in AH, so its very easy for the above scenario to be correct at 700 yards.

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2001, 07:41:00 AM »
Tac,

I didn't realize that other A/C had the problem of spinning/Stalling as soon as flaps are deployed under G. The F4U does the same thing. I think it is because the drag is overmodeled for flaps so deploying them does more to stall your a/c than it does to add lift. Hopefully this will be fixed in 1.08.

What do ya think? Two weeks  ;)

Offline whels

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1517
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2001, 10:50:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tac:
[QB]Damage model (takes only 3 .50 cal shots to blow a wing off for example).
-----------
actually  i think all planes in AH are too fragile.  Tac do u mean 3 flashes or 3 single
bullets. if u mean 3 50s flash hits u could be having up to 100 bullets hitting. flashes
dont represent  single bullet hits.
--------------

Nose guns dont SEEM to hit as hard as they should (I need the same amount of pings to kill an enemy fiter in a P-51B as I would in a P-38's .50's WITH a 20mm cannon hitting at d400 or less). Also, since they are nose guns, they should be hitting at convergence at any range. Hitting a fighter at d300 is NOT even close as hitting one at d700.Takes 4 times the hits at d700 than at d300 to even do any damage to an enemy fiter. Very odd considering that if ONE gun hits, all 4 .50's should hit with it.

--------
even the p38 has convergance orther wise ud have bullet strikes all over. most pilots liked to set thier cone of fire to hit
a single spot.  but the p38 has the advantage
of greater hit cone where the  bullets
fired will hit the plane in a greater range  of distances. where with planes with standard gun placements, inside or outside
the convergance spot u stand a chance of
some bullets missing because of them being
spread apart.

--------------
whels

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2001, 10:50:00 AM »
Verm, Juzz, there should be no significant dispersion on the guns. On the 38's case, if 1 round hits, all 4 should be hitting since the guns are packed in an area no bigger than a soccer ball (or basketball). At close range, d300 or less that would also include the 20mm.

Posted by Widewing:

"All of the P-38's guns are fired via individual solenoids. All of the Brownings will have virtually identical "lock time". "Lock time" defines the time between the release of the hammer and the firing pin striking the primer. All of the solenoids should have nearly identical field rise times, meaning that all should pull in at the same time, give or take a few milliseconds. So, for all practical purposes, all five weapons will discharge at the same time. Thus, the first five rounds will be heading towards the target in a tight group, equal to the actual gun placement or pattern. When the arrive at the enemy aircraft, they WILL STILL BE IN THE SAME GROUPING (with the exception of the 20mm round, see below). Hence, they will strike the enemy aircraft with the same pattern. There will be no significant dispersion whatsoever, other than ballistic differences between the Brownings and Hispano. As the weapons cycle, all four browings will discharge simultaniously, with the slower cyling Hispano lagging behind. This next series of .50 cal rounds will follow about 80 milliseconds after the first group, and will arrive in a group as well. Obviously, the 20mm round will arrive later. Assuming the enemy aircraft is moving at 300mph across the shooter's path. Then, the aircraft has moved about 35 ft since the first group of rounds struck (this assumes that no attempt was made to pull lead). In all likelihood, this second group will miss altogether. Remember, machineguns fire at a specific rate, and if all are triggered at the same time, this rate can now be identified as groups seperated by the cycle time of the weapons. Think of the Browning's cycle time as a continuous sine wave. with the hispano being represented by a corresponding wave of a slightly different frequency. Therefore, for a long burst you will have two distinct patterns developing with one out of phase to the other. With multiple guns, you simply don't get the "stiching" effect seen with a single weapon or that protrayed by Hollywood. You will get groups of hits seperated by the time/distance equation.

Think of the P-38's weapons as a garden hose.
The concentration will make you very wet. Bring one gun to bear, and all are on target. This provides a downside as well. Miss with one and it's likely that you have missed with all. Wing mounted guns increase the chances of a hit, but nose mounted ordnance tends towards a greater mutiple of hits (except when at the convergence point), therefore more damaging hits should your aim be true.

There should not be any significant dispersion of .50 cal rounds from the P-38, right out to maximum range. Deflection shots will move the 20mm round(s) out of the general pattern due to reduced velocity and slower cyclic rate."

"One last factor. Boresighting. Every fighter gets boresighted on a regular basis. Pilots have their favorite setups. The P-38 can have its guns set to converge at a theoretical point, or they can be sighted parallel, with dispersion being minimal on the sighting range. Either way, dispersal is not significant at the ranges typically encountered in WWII ACM."

"Note that I have not disputed that dispersion is greater at extreme range. However, we should be confining our discussion to "effective range", distances under 1,000 ft. Moreover, in a snap-shot situation, dispersion is not an issue as only the first group of rounds is in question. Unless, the pilot trys to pull lead and let the enemy aircraft fly through the stream. In such cases, maneuvering, more than any other factor, will create a cone of dispersal, wherein the weapon, ammuntion or mounting are not of great significance. The greatest disperser of fire is the motion of the aircraft, which is never anywhere near as precise as the accuracy of the weapons themselves"

"Normal dispersion can be assumed to be related to normal accuracy. Since a well maintained Browning M2 should group its round at something less than 2 inches at 100 yards, I imagine that normal dispersion cone per gun at 1,000 yards should be in the area of 24 inches. If the quality of the ammunition is consistant, all the rounds fired simultaneously should arrive within a very few milleseconds of each other. You should realize that virtually all of the dispersion cones will overlap at longer ranges.

Since all the firing solenoids are switched at the same time, and because each solenoid will pull faster or slower than any other (we're probably talking about microseconds), it is not possible to accurately guess what the firing sequence is. Nonetheless, I feel safe saying that for all practical purposes, they fire at the same time."
 http://www.hitechcreations.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=9&t=002464

=P

Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2001, 11:10:00 AM »
Ummm Tac, then go on to read the rest of that thread too see why while Widewing posted some good material, its not the whole story either.

Your still going to have dispersion due to differences in manufacturing quality (bullets, barrels, solenoids, etc.), wear and tear from normal use (let alone the abuse military equipment takes in the field), strength and rigidty of the gun mounts, and a whole lot of other things I don't have time to write about.

I'll look for a picture I use to have that showed a P-38 firing tracers at night on a hardstand, while the mechanics were zeroing in the aim and convergence on the guns.

If you think its gonna be a near lasergun tight grouping at any reasonable firing distance, our fooling yourself.  :) Better than wing mounted guns, I whole heartidly agree. But no where near perfect.

Offline Naudet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 729
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2001, 11:54:00 AM »
I have flown the P38 relativly often in the last week for JABO runs.

And i agree on most points tacs mentioned:

engine and elevator/horizontal stab fall of to fast

the dive flaps actually dont seem to have any tendency to pull the bird out of the dive, i.e. whenever i pull hard up after dive bombing (dive flaps out), i pull the stick full back AND use elevator trim to get maximum effect


but i cant find were the guns are to weak or were the flaps cause a snap stall/spin.

i.e. deacking with a P38 is most effective cause due to nose installation i can kill acks at about 30% greater distance.

I yet found that the guns were extremly efficient against airtargets

and to the flaps, i the hard and dirty low alt fights that accure over nme fields, i often use flaps (notch 1 or 2) to tighten a break turn, i deploy or retract them while turning, but yet i really never spinned that P38 out (same counts for F4U flaps), i use them quite often and never had problems so far

but i am no P38 A2A expert as u tac, i normally fly the FW190 in A2A, so maybe the sensitiveness of my elevator control prevents me from stalling out the P38 with flaps

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Tac, could you inform me of the way in which the P-38 is porked?
« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2001, 12:08:00 PM »
"I'll look for a picture I use to have that showed a P-38 firing tracers at night on a hardstand, while the mechanics were zeroing in the aim and convergence on the guns"

Like this one?   :)

 

"I yet found that the guns were extremly efficient against airtargets "

Didnt say it wasnt. Just that I see no difference from a B-Pony to a 38 when hitting a con. Close packing of guns should deliver a boatload more damage than wing guns outside convergence.

"but i am no P38 A2A expert as u tac, i normally fly the FW190 in A2A, so maybe the sensitiveness of my elevator control prevents me from stalling out the P38 with flaps"

im no expert, im a stubborn mule on it.

[ 09-28-2001: Message edited by: Tac ]