Author Topic: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting  (Read 42632 times)

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #285 on: August 09, 2011, 12:36:00 PM »
HT,

So, after you guys get finished with the interior redesign of the Stuka. Can we get the 37mms after that?

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

 :aok
So that curved adjustable base plate for the Revi12C/D(Schwenkplatte) can be seen at this link for the Ju87. Are we going to get a working version of that?  ;)

Fl.52196 Schwenkplatte mit Revi12C/D - Revi12 with base mount to attache to curved plate.
Fl.52196 Schwenkplatte fur Revi12C/D - Curved plate to recieve Revi12.

http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.de/instrumente/katalog/revi/revi.htm
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline tmetal

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #286 on: August 09, 2011, 03:40:01 PM »
A German plane with an evil grin like that? Oh yeh!

First class return-to-tower service with a smile.  :D
The real problem is anyone should feel like they can come to this forum and make a wish without being treated in a derogatory manner.  The only discussion should be centered around whether it would work, or how it would work and so on always in a respectful manner.

-Skuzzy 5/18/17

Offline 10thmd

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #287 on: September 17, 2011, 01:32:31 AM »
I summon you back from the dead.

Seriously already I've read Stuka pilot 3 times in 2 months already.

- Der Wander Zirkus -
“You can all go to hell; I will go to Texas

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5785
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #288 on: September 17, 2011, 03:10:32 AM »
It's not dead.  It's simmering slowly. :D

Oh, and +1 to BK.37's (again), and could you toss in an updated Stuka in that while ye be at it please? :x
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Raphael

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #289 on: September 17, 2011, 12:24:00 PM »
IT IS BACK!
Remember 08/08/2012
 Youtube videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/raphael103/featured
Game ID => Raphael
XO of Jg5

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #290 on: September 17, 2011, 07:55:19 PM »
we need this.

+1,000,000,000,000,000.00
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #291 on: September 17, 2011, 08:05:10 PM »
wow talk about a punt...

Offline Ruah

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #292 on: September 18, 2011, 08:54:09 AM »
I agree with myself and others who have returned from the past to haunt me.


Kommando Nowotny
I/JG 77, 2nd Staffel
Mediterranean Maelstrom
HORRIDO

Offline Mendo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #293 on: October 22, 2011, 03:43:02 PM »
+1 on adding the g2 with the 37mm package, 12 rounds per gun and not 6 as some seem to be fanatically convinced of. There was a 6 round magazine on each side of each gun pod, the inner mag is not the ejection port as some believe. I think that anyone who watches the included link and pays attention to the last 16 or so seconds can very clearly see loaded magazines on both sides of the pods. The guns were set to fire in tandem which boils down to 12 times firing the pair and a possible 12 dead gv's. I know this thread has been kicked around alot and there has been much debate on the ammo loadout and I hope this will clear up the confusion and hitech will finally give us the g2 with 37mm pack.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umh_YP5o6k0&feature=related
Enjoy,

Mendo

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #294 on: October 22, 2011, 05:26:40 PM »
+1 on adding the g2 with the 37mm package, 12 rounds per gun and not 6 as some seem to be fanatically convinced of. There was a 6 round magazine on each side of each gun pod, the inner mag is not the ejection port as some believe. I think that anyone who watches the included link and pays attention to the last 16 or so seconds can very clearly see loaded magazines on both sides of the pods. The guns were set to fire in tandem which boils down to 12 times firing the pair and a possible 12 dead gv's. I know this thread has been kicked around alot and there has been much debate on the ammo loadout and I hope this will clear up the confusion and hitech will finally give us the g2 with 37mm pack.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umh_YP5o6k0&feature=related
Enjoy,

Mendo

There is no need to make a separate Stuka model, which is what the G2 would need (G2 was based on the Ju87D-5).  To get the G-1, just add the ordnance option of the 37mm cannon for the existing D-3 and that would convert it to the G-1, which is based on the Ju-87 we currently have in game.  Far less trouble than creating a new plane model.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4486
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #295 on: October 22, 2011, 05:29:05 PM »
In my opinion a 20mm one (d-5?) would be more useful, protecting from being hoed. That 12 rpg is just not so much.
AoM
City of ice

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10573
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #296 on: October 22, 2011, 05:49:53 PM »
Some new pics I have found. Well clearer  :aok


Edit: Well I guess I posted these before on this link :o





« Last Edit: October 22, 2011, 05:53:35 PM by lyric1 »

Offline Raphael

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #297 on: October 22, 2011, 08:01:18 PM »
WHY IS IT TAKING SO LONG?! D:
Remember 08/08/2012
 Youtube videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/raphael103/featured
Game ID => Raphael
XO of Jg5

Offline 1Nicolas

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 176
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #298 on: October 22, 2011, 08:45:48 PM »
TIME TO SHOW FLAKPANZER"S A LESSON!

(My World Of Tank signature)
There are no great men, just great challenges which ordinary men, out of necessity, are forced by circumstances to meet.

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: JU87 w\37mm Cannon for Tank Busting
« Reply #299 on: October 22, 2011, 09:07:41 PM »
     I actually am surprised that we do not have this yet.  I would assume that whenever the JU87 gets updated that this model will be included.

     The reason I believe this is that we've just seen the P40 updated, and different models added.  At the same time we received updated Panzer IV and three different versions.  And earlier, the Mossie was updated, and soon after a different model came out, as well as the M3, when updated that had a new version.
 
     I believe that the going trend now is that when something gets added, or updated, the most logical sense being to get the biggest bang for your buck. (i.e include the varations)  This further makes sense to me in that I would suspect it is getting harder and harder to include new aircraft due to more complex modeling of the aircraft, and the probable rariety of data to recreat a new aircraft that we do not have.  (iar.80 for example...anyone have those blueprints?)

    ^yeah I know I kinda went off on a tangent there :uhoh