more meshersmitts

[EskimoJoe]

it would be nice to have some more messhersmitts
what would you sudjest?(excuse any incorrect spelling)

www.dictionary.com

[Ack-Ack]

yes it an advanced 109. it looks like a p82 only has 1 cockpit instead of 2 and it has the 109 armmament doubled
I'm not sure if it even got of the drawing board

No, it was not an 'advanced' Bf 109, nor was there ever a "Me 603".  You are confusing it with the Me 609 which paired two Me 309's into one airframe similiar to that of the Bf 109Z.  Before you get your hopes up too much, it never went beyond the design phase.


ack-ack

[warphoenix]

No, it was not an 'advanced' Bf 109, nor was there ever a "Me 603".  You are confusing it with the Me 609 which paired two Me 309's into one airframe similiar to that of the Bf 109Z.  Before you get your hopes up too much, it never went beyond the design phase.


ack-ack

thank you for finding that mistake on the # (using new comp still geting used to different key arrangment)

[sunfan1121]

thank you for finding that mistake on the # (using new comp still geting used to different key arrangment)

I lol'd

[Plawranc]

Leave the guy alone, you cut the squeakers slack.....................


 

[Saurdaukar]

The Me-209 will be in my new sim.

Investors are needed for research, though.

[morfiend]

The Me-209 will be in my new sim.

Investors are needed for research, though.

 

[LLogann]

Whoa, whoa, whoa, time out now........  The 209 or the 209 II?  I'm assuming the II since you are already adding the RV-6.   

The Me-209 will be in my new sim.

Investors are needed for research, though.

NO, IT ISN'T.

Is it even a plane?  (me 603)

But maybe they speak of the me-609?

[warphoenix]

But maybe they speak of the me-609?

lets look at past replies:

No, it was not an 'advanced' Bf 109, nor was there ever a "Me 603".  You are confusing it with the Me 609 which paired two Me 309's into one airframe similiar to that of the Bf 109Z.  Before you get your hopes up too much, it never went beyond the design phase.


ack-ack

my quote of that:

thank you for finding that mistake on the # (using new comp still geting used to different key arrangment)

[gyrene81]

thank you for finding that mistake on the # (using new comp still geting used to different key arrangment)

Ok so when did they put the number keys out of standard U.S. number sequence...or did you get one of those new Belkin Scooby Doo keyboards?

[Digr1]

Me410.

Not the 410 even the Luftwaffe looked on that as a failure

[LLogann]

You expect me to read what Ack-Ack writes?  Wow, you must be even younger then we thought.

lets look at past replies:my quote of that:

[PJ_Godzilla]

No, it was not an 'advanced' Bf 109, nor was there ever a "Me 603".  You are confusing it with the Me 609 which paired two Me 309's into one airframe similiar to that of the Bf 109Z.  Before you get your hopes up too much, it never went beyond the design phase.


ack-ack

I think he's after the 309 which was supposed to be an evolution of the 209-II. I don't think it was ever built, though. The 209 was flawed - reputedly slower than the D-9... and without handling benefit over the 109k...

Pic here, shown with Jumo, I believe, though DB603 was intended production engine (obvious reasons for swap, ii desu ka?)

http://www.militaryfactory.com/imageviewer/ac/pic-detail.asp?aircraft_id=763&sCurrentPic=messerschmitt-me-209-ii.jpg&sCurrentDescriptor=Right%20side%20view%20of%20a%20Messerschmitt%20Me%20209-II%20fighter%20prototype

[PJ_Godzilla]

Not the 410 even the Luftwaffe looked on that as a failure

I call bs on this. The 210 was the failure. The 410 addressed the bulk of the 210 issues.

Hitech, I can see you got that 410. Now gimme my 410.

Just leave the 410 on the desktop.

[warphoenix]

Ok so when did they put the number keys out of standard U.S. number sequence...or did you get one of those new Belkin Scooby Doo keyboards?

what I meant by that is the slight curve on the keyboard I'm using and I'm used to flat