Author Topic: Question about OS  (Read 1877 times)

Offline 38ruk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2121
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Re: Question about OS
« Reply #45 on: January 27, 2010, 01:38:09 PM »
Win 2K was a good O/S. How old are you?

I ran Win2k Pro for a couple of years after XP was out.  I really liked 2k .... after SP3 .  It was stable and fast with a more bare bones feel that i prefer.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Question about OS
« Reply #46 on: January 27, 2010, 02:00:03 PM »
Win 2K was a good O/S. How old are you?
Compared to what? Win 3.1?

No, out of the box Win2k was a security nightmare let alone trying to get hardware to work with it...even legacy hardware could be difficult...going to the NT core was a good idea but Microsoft almost blew it by not including the built in legacy support that was released in SP1-4...it was almost as easily infected with malware as Win95/98.

You must not have kept track of the updates for it...from the day it was released...nightmare until SP4.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9835
Re: Question about OS
« Reply #47 on: January 27, 2010, 03:59:44 PM »
Nope, I deployed Win 3, 3.1, NT4, Win 2k, Win 2003, and now 2k8 systems. Win 2k was great,never had any significant issues as neither did many other people I knew/know.