Author Topic: Swordfish  (Read 2981 times)

Offline firemike

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2010, 05:04:11 PM »
your serious theyed just be cannon fauder -1000000000

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2010, 07:24:23 PM »
You're serious? They'd just be cannon fodder! -1000000000
They said the same about the Brewster B-239, yet the Brewster makes up .49 percent of all the deaths in the last tour and .54 percent of all kills in the most recent score. It isn't all about whether or not the plane is a late war über ride, rather, a plane should be added to fill a gap that is readily apparent in the game's plane set.
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2010, 07:43:57 PM »
Have you noticed that there are no biplanes in aces high 2 i wish there were like the gladiator was obsolete but very important, but it would be awesome if we had the Swordfish because it was a very important in many carrier attacks.  I don't know why aces high doesn't have biplanes but it would be awesome to have at least the Swordfish.

Wasn't important in any carrier attacks. important in the sinking of Bismark, and in blowing the French out of the water, but in AH a 130mph biplane attacking the ridiculous very late war type ack over carriers would be suicidal
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #18 on: March 09, 2010, 07:46:26 PM »
They said the same about the Brewster B-239, yet the Brewster makes up .49 percent of all the deaths in the last tour and .54 percent of all kills in the most recent score. It isn't all about whether or not the plane is a late war über ride, rather, a plane should be added to fill a gap that is readily apparent in the game's plane set.


Wow, half of one percent on what has got to be THE most overly generous modeling of the brewster in the history of flight sim gaming?


 :rofl


(Just laughing at the numbers, I'm all for the swordfish and for filling plane set holes!)


P.S. Danny, in scenarios, AvA, SEA, etc, the lethality of CV ack can be toned down for early-war planesets, thus making it somewhat survivable to attack carriers in early war planes. In the MAs you are quite right, it would be suicide.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2010, 07:48:07 PM by Krusty »

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2010, 09:37:11 PM »
I have not double checked the stats for the Swordfish, but woulnt the B5N be a viable substitute?   :)
B5N2 is substantially more capable.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline grupa

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #20 on: March 25, 2010, 05:41:26 PM »
Because THEY SUCK! lol :rofl
  they dont suck some of them did but a lot of important ones didnt

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4672
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #21 on: March 25, 2010, 05:52:58 PM »
You may be right that they were most produced but a Po-2?????? Come on man at least show a biplane that saw some freaking action. Like the Gladiator, I-15, or Swordfish. Not a TRAINER!?!?!!?


perdweeb
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2010, 06:14:29 PM »
     The Night Witches used the Po-2 as a night harassment bomber.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline pwnorris

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 64
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #23 on: March 26, 2010, 01:03:08 PM »
I believe that some bi-planes operated off of cruisers and battleships as spotters.  Then again, they would probably be operating away from more capable aircraft.

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #24 on: March 26, 2010, 01:26:28 PM »
I believe that some bi-planes operated off of cruisers and battleships as spotters.  Then again, they would probably be operating away from more capable aircraft.



Curtiss SOC "Seagull" Scout-Observation Planes











I just like the pics.   
:D

wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #25 on: March 26, 2010, 01:27:28 PM »
Why in the world are you guys talking about the sexual pref of an aircraft?  It's like a bunch of BANS waiting to happen................   :confused:
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #26 on: March 26, 2010, 02:12:50 PM »
Swordfish would be ripped apart in MA. You cant even get close enough in 88s most of the time. how do you expect to get close enough in a biplane that, at best, will go 150 mph?
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #27 on: March 26, 2010, 08:58:34 PM »
"I have not double checked the stats for the Swordfish, but woulnt the B5N be a viable substitute?"

There is no substitute for a Swordfish, it's unique.

Cannon fodder? All too often the case, but it didn't deter the aircrews of the Fleet Air Arm from attacking whenever and wherever they found the enemy. I couldn't care less whether 'it won't survive in the MA' or not - but I'd like the chance to fly the aircraft that succeeded against the odds and crippled the Italian fleet at Taranto, sank hundreds of thousands of tons of Axis merchantmen in the Mediterranean, protected the vital Atlantic convoys from U-boat attack by flying off and landing on the smallest operational carrier decks ever built (the MAC-ships) - and took on the greatest concentration of German warships seen in WW2, when 'Winkle' Esmonde led his 'forlorn hope' of half-a-dozen Stringbags against Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, Prinz Eugen and their air and sea escorts even though he knew he hadn't a hope in hell of surviving.

Yes, I'm one of those weirdos who like to re-create and test history by using a good combat flight sim, not a MA arcade-gamer - so I vote FOR the Swordfish. And the US Navy's Douglas TBD-1 Devastator.

 :cool:
« Last Edit: March 26, 2010, 10:13:23 PM by Simba »
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #28 on: March 26, 2010, 11:08:25 PM »
It would be a cool Early War plane +1.

Offline Hap

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3908
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #29 on: March 27, 2010, 08:21:39 AM »
 :aok :aok :aok
"I have not double checked the stats for the Swordfish, but woulnt the B5N be a viable substitute?"

There is no substitute for a Swordfish, it's unique.

Cannon fodder? All too often the case, but it didn't deter the aircrews of the Fleet Air Arm from attacking whenever and wherever they found the enemy. I couldn't care less whether 'it won't survive in the MA' or not - but I'd like the chance to fly the aircraft that succeeded against the odds and crippled the Italian fleet at Taranto, sank hundreds of thousands of tons of Axis merchantmen in the Mediterranean, protected the vital Atlantic convoys from U-boat attack by flying off and landing on the smallest operational carrier decks ever built (the MAC-ships) - and took on the greatest concentration of German warships seen in WW2, when 'Winkle' Esmonde led his 'forlorn hope' of half-a-dozen Stringbags against Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, Prinz Eugen and their air and sea escorts even though he knew he hadn't a hope in hell of surviving.

Yes, I'm one of those weirdos who like to re-create and test history by using a good combat flight sim, not a MA arcade-gamer - so I vote FOR the Swordfish. And the US Navy's Douglas TBD-1 Devastator.

 :cool: