Not in of itself, no, but considering that there's very important planes missing that had production runs equal to (G4M)--if not DOUBLING (He-111)--all of bigjava's requests COMBINED I'd say that places the G.55 and any of these bombers pretty low on the priority list.
I can see your point, but, as ususally, this is where the 2 different philosophies of aircraft inclusion collied. Guys like you take the historical and scenario based approach, where production #s and scenario usability are paramount. Guys like me consider the 24/7 MA usability as the most important inclusion factor. I don't want to weigh each of these 2 approaches against each other, since both are equal concerns re. the further development of AH.
Thus, IMO the G4M, He111 and G.55 should be solidly in the middle of the priority list. The G4M and He111 both score high on scenario value, but most likely fail in MA value. The G.55 is the opposite.
I won't comment on the bombers, since I know too little about them.
