Author Topic: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?  (Read 6304 times)

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #75 on: April 22, 2010, 11:49:51 AM »
Karnak must work with statistics a lot... Select only the roles the Mosquito can fill and compare with other aircraft, regardless of other roles that other aircraft can fill. Declare Mosquito the winner.

Yep. :)  Particularly funny was the vague "strike aircraft"-category" which conviniently forgets the fact that Ju-88 was a dive bomber fitted with dive brakes and very accurate dive bomb sight.
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #76 on: April 22, 2010, 12:37:06 PM »
If we consider Smoe's argument for a moment, which WWII aircraft was the most versatile with little or no modification? I think the Me 410 would be a strong contender with that multi-purpose bomb bay and huge number of field kits available.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #77 on: April 22, 2010, 12:53:01 PM »
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #78 on: April 22, 2010, 01:50:56 PM »
Yep. :)  Particularly funny was the vague "strike aircraft"-category" which conviniently forgets the fact that Ju-88 was a dive bomber fitted with dive brakes and very accurate dive bomb sight.
That is one of the reasons I said "Yes" to the Ju88 in that category.  Your objection confuses me, honestly.  I just listed the core tasks aircraft in WWII had to fill.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #79 on: April 22, 2010, 01:51:44 PM »
If we consider Smoe's argument for a moment, which WWII aircraft was the most versatile with little or no modification? I think the Me 410 would be a strong contender with that multi-purpose bomb bay and huge number of field kits available.
Mossie 6.  Me410 was crap in comparison.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #80 on: April 22, 2010, 01:58:49 PM »
Your objection confuses me, honestly.

Mosquite wasn't a dedicated dive bomber, Ju-88 was. Both of them dropped bombs. So putting in a uniform  "strike aircraft-category" completely forgets this fact. Ju-88 had airbrakes, dive bomb sight. Neither of which the Mosquito had. Personally, I don't care either way which plane you guys find the most versatile. I just commented on the methods of comparison.
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #81 on: April 22, 2010, 02:58:53 PM »
The P-38 was by far the dominant USAAF fighter in the PTO and it was the USAAF fighter in that theater that broke the IJAF's back and wiped the ground with the IJA, not the Jug or the Mustang.

ack-ack

Umm ... the F6-F was badass in the PTO ... 19:1 kill ratio along with it's ability for ground attack ... ranks it in the top IMHO.
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #82 on: April 22, 2010, 03:36:27 PM »
Umm ... the F6-F was badass in the PTO ... 19:1 kill ratio along with it's ability for ground attack ... ranks it in the top IMHO.

most the japanese pilots that knew anything about flying were dead by the time the hellcat showed up. 
-AoM-

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #83 on: April 22, 2010, 04:11:24 PM »
most the japanese pilots that knew anything about flying were dead by the time the hellcat showed up. 

LOL ... so all the good ones were dead by September 1 of 1943 ... too funny.
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #84 on: April 22, 2010, 04:19:49 PM »
LOL ... so all the good ones were dead by September 1 of 1943 ... too funny.

when did I say all?
-AoM-

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #85 on: April 22, 2010, 04:26:50 PM »
Mossie 6.  Me410 was crap in comparison.

We're not discussing which aircraft performed best in each role, just which was the most versatile. You seem to be hopelessly in love with the Mossie, which is quite understandable; it is a beautiful and capable aircraft. :)

Could the Mosquito Mk. VI carry torpedoes? Could it dive-bomb? Could it carry an anti-tank cannon? (Me 410 could carry the BK 37 and BK 50) Could it carry a variety of gun packages?

Again we're not discussing performance, but versatility; and the Me 410 was certainly competitive enough to be successful in the various roles it was assigned.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #86 on: April 22, 2010, 04:59:05 PM »
*sigh*

The VI didn't carry torpedoes, naval Mosquitos did post-war.

Mosquitos could and did dive-bomb, though it was not normal practice, and at high angles it was recommended to attack with wing-bombs only.

Of course it could carry an anti-tank cannon, though in practice the Molins was used vs. surface vessels and U-boats.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #87 on: April 22, 2010, 05:35:16 PM »
Those were different versions... not the VI. Remember we're discussing the most versatile single aircraft version, not multiple versions.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #88 on: April 22, 2010, 05:53:51 PM »
ehm...




i mean, seriously, it can do anything  :aok
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Most Versatile Aircraft of WW2?
« Reply #89 on: April 22, 2010, 06:17:28 PM »
Those were different versions... not the VI. Remember we're discussing the most versatile single aircraft version, not multiple versions.


Which version of the Ju 88 was able to carry both torps and an anti-tank gun then?
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB