Author Topic: DEADLIEST CATCH!  (Read 1188 times)

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2010, 01:13:23 PM »
Well yes and no.

I remember sig and phil talking at the end of last season about "switching" jakes.

I think phil knows that if he doesn't separate his boys, one is going to end up seriously hurt or dead.
Considering that both restart at the bottom and have to work their way up again.
It will likely be good for both of them.

I know Sig won't put up with little Jake's BS like Phil does.

The producers obviously think it will make good TV.
But I think it might have happened even if the TV camera's were not there.

Brothers working the same boat is always going to be tough.
Jake blows so much smoke, will say anything, then immediately turn the tables once your back is turned.

I think both Sig and Phil figure the 2 Jakes are too big for their britches and that this will bring them down a peg.

Should make for interesting watching this season.


Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2010, 02:55:41 PM »
Just one more piece of proof that modern man is stupider than our ancestors. Pretty soon there won't be anything decent to watch, just junk pseudo reality and sex...
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Dr_Death8

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 574
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2010, 05:23:10 PM »
Don't give away too much as it is on the DVR to watch this weekend. Wasn't it Jake that just got busted out in Washington for a DUI??? :cheers:

Offline branch37

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1831
      • VF-17 Jolly Rogers
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2010, 07:36:51 PM »
Well yes and no.

I remember sig and phil talking at the end of last season about "switching" jakes.

I think phil knows that if he doesn't separate his boys, one is going to end up seriously hurt or dead.
Considering that both restart at the bottom and have to work their way up again.
It will likely be good for both of them.

I know Sig won't put up with little Jake's BS like Phil does.

The producers obviously think it will make good TV.
But I think it might have happened even if the TV camera's were not there.

Brothers working the same boat is always going to be tough.
Jake blows so much smoke, will say anything, then immediately turn the tables once your back is turned.

I think both Sig and Phil figure the 2 Jakes are too big for their britches and that this will bring them down a peg.

Should make for interesting watching this season.



Very well said there :aok

i look forward to jake tryin to BS his way past Sig and Edgar.

CMDR Branch37
VF-17 Jolly Rogers  C.O.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #19 on: April 15, 2010, 08:20:11 PM »
love the show.  Captain Phil was probably my second favorite behind Sig.  

Now a question.  Do yall think the shows producers had any influence on the switching of deckhands?

No they didn't.   The two Captains wanted to "put up or shut up" on the "cockiness/worth your salt" from the Jakes.  
« Last Edit: April 15, 2010, 09:03:16 PM by Masherbrum »
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline greens

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1413
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #20 on: April 15, 2010, 08:40:37 PM »
I worked out there in bering sea w a couple factory trawlers. i hated it. was never fun, only fun was getting off done w the season n the big fat check  :eek: scary at times tho, we fished for polluck n cod.  i quit going out after i got balll n chained w my girlfriend. then babies started popping out.  :cheers:
_-=ELIM EAGLES=-_
in loving memory of OZ <Eagles21>
 miss you bro!

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #21 on: April 15, 2010, 09:52:04 PM »


 :rock

Offline Dadano

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 714
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #22 on: April 15, 2010, 10:20:21 PM »
I worked out there in bering sea w a couple factory trawlers. i hated it. was never fun, only fun was getting off done w the season n the big fat check  :eek: scary at times tho, we fished for polluck n cod.  i quit going out after i got balll n chained w my girlfriend. then babies started popping out.  :cheers:
What boat?
Dano
Army of Muppets

"Furballing is a disease, and we are the cure... Oink."
-Twitchy

Offline greens

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1413
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #23 on: April 15, 2010, 11:48:42 PM »
What boat?
pacific n northern glacier outta seattle, wa
_-=ELIM EAGLES=-_
in loving memory of OZ <Eagles21>
 miss you bro!

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #24 on: April 16, 2010, 01:07:38 AM »
The best show on Discovery by a good margin.

Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #25 on: April 16, 2010, 09:12:12 AM »
Great show...looks like the production values are on the up

 Tronsky
God created Arrakis to train the faithful

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #26 on: April 16, 2010, 06:31:26 PM »
Love it, wondering what they will do when the come up on Captain Phil's passing.

That's my concern for this season along with my friend who watches hte show with me, I'm hoping it'll be one or two really good episodes dedicated to the event and remembering him, at most.  I fear the show using it to help float the season along by using the unfortunate event as "filler" for half this season's episodes.  He should be remembered, tribute should be paid, but i'm hoping it won't be overplayed to the point that I feel they're disrespecting his memory by not mostly moving forward with a strong stride.

Last season they almost killed me with how much they overplayed and kinda glorified one event that, boiled down and seeing past the editing of the show, was an idiotic mistake by a lazy skipper that didn't have the commen sence to have the crew batten down the hatches (put on a tarp in this case) BEFORE charging into the thick of a heavy storm... and he almost got his crew killed!  I'm sure some disagree with me on my opinion of that event, but I argue that any "sea survival" technique that starts off with "Now when the storm starts to pick up, I'm gonna send you guys out onto the deck..." hasn't had more intelligent thought put into it than one's desire to scratch an itch on their behind.  Last season when that skipper first pitched his idea and before we got to seeing the almost disasterous results, the responce I had in my head was "sh!@, why not just leave your pots lying around on the deck unstacked and unsecured before the last second too?", it seemed like just as intelligent an idea to me.


On the Jakes, I think Phil was the one last season who first said or responded to a question the camera/producer pitched while they were alone on the bridge that he thinks it would be a great idea if one of his sons got some experience working on another boat, but that he didn't know which one or how to even pitch it (had a hint of "they're my boys, I've never played favorites").  I think after that the producers did some proding/snooping, and then pitched the idea and let Phil and Stig stew on it for a little bit before one decided the time was right to just do it (because once they made up their minds, the exchange was made and paperwork signed in less than 24-hours, lol).
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline branch37

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1831
      • VF-17 Jolly Rogers
Re: DEADLIEST CATCH!
« Reply #27 on: April 18, 2010, 07:47:29 PM »
Quote
On the Jakes, I think Phil was the one last season who first said or responded to a question the camera/producer pitched while they were alone on the bridge that he thinks it would be a great idea if one of his sons got some experience working on another boat, but that he didn't know which one or how to even pitch it (had a hint of "they're my boys, I've never played favorites").  I think after that the producers did some proding/snooping, and then pitched the idea and let Phil and Stig stew on it for a little bit before one decided the time was right to just do it (because once they made up their minds, the exchange was made and paperwork signed in less than 24-hours, lol).

Thats pretty much what i figured too.  I figured that the producers had some input, but the decision rested with the skippers as it should be.


CMDR Branch37
VF-17 Jolly Rogers  C.O.