Author Topic: New Mossi Performance. Wow.  (Read 2253 times)

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2010, 01:34:02 PM »
I am puzzled why the MIL speed of the Mossie is different at 5,000ft though.

It seems the old Mossie did gain TAS faster at increasing altitudes than the new one. It also looks like that the new model's supercharger's first stage has a higher FTH than the old ones.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #16 on: May 13, 2010, 01:41:00 PM »
It seems the old Mossie did gain TAS faster at increasing altitudes than the new one. It also looks like that the new model's supercharger's first stage has a higher FTH than the old ones.
I'll need to do more tests, but my charts in books put the Merlin 25's FTH at 13,000ft, which is why I tested it there.  Got higher speeds even though boost wasn't hitting +18lbs once I got over 12,000ft.  Boost in the old Mossie was almost entirely disassociated from actual performance, so I ignore it.

Also note that the new Mossie's MIL starts out the same, well, 1mph slower, and ends up slightly faster.  The dip at 5,000ft is a dip.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2010, 03:05:44 PM »
Does anyone have handy the weight of the old Mossi as tested for speed/climb?  The new model is lighter... but I cant find the exact figure for teh old model.  I've misplaced that sticky note.   :)
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10459
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #18 on: May 13, 2010, 03:51:49 PM »
Does anyone have handy the weight of the old Mossi as tested for speed/climb?  The new model is lighter... but I cant find the exact figure for teh old model.  I've misplaced that sticky note.   :)


 If you check Boozeman's post he listes the weights old and new! :aok


   :salute

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #19 on: May 13, 2010, 06:38:38 PM »

 If you check Boozeman's post he listes the weights old and new! :aok


   :salute

But is that the weight at what the old Mossi was rated for the speed/climb charts?  I am under the impression that Boozeman's data is controlled for his testing.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #20 on: May 13, 2010, 07:19:26 PM »
I have the old chart saved at home.  I can answer when I get home, but that will be about five hours from now.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #21 on: May 13, 2010, 07:28:35 PM »
I have the old chart saved at home.  I can answer when I get home, but that will be about five hours from now.

The old speed/climb charts do not show the weights, at least the one I have printed off from the trainer's website.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #22 on: May 13, 2010, 07:32:47 PM »
I also have a copy of AH 2.18.8 that I have been using for testing purposes.  I can get you any weight you like, just tell me the configuration.

I recall the original charts were at 22,221lbs, 100% fuel and 2,000lbs of bombs.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #23 on: May 13, 2010, 07:59:55 PM »
From AHWiki:
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #24 on: May 13, 2010, 08:21:50 PM »
The Mossie has a positive K/D ratio for the first time that I have ever seen:

Mosquito Mk VI:    Kills: 2051    Deaths: 1904     Kill/Death Ratio: 1.08
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #25 on: May 13, 2010, 08:44:57 PM »
The Mossie has a positive K/D ratio for the first time that I have ever seen:

Mosquito Mk VI:    Kills: 2051    Deaths: 1904     Kill/Death Ratio: 1.08
maybe cuz the good pilots started flying it :D :P
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #26 on: May 13, 2010, 09:42:53 PM »
maybe cuz the good pilots started flying it :D :P

That's gonna leave a mark.



Ya b*s***d.





 :D
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #27 on: May 14, 2010, 02:49:21 AM »
I'll need to do more tests, but my charts in books put the Merlin 25's FTH at 13,000ft, which is why I tested it there.  Got higher speeds even though boost wasn't hitting +18lbs once I got over 12,000ft.  Boost in the old Mossie was almost entirely disassociated from actual performance, so I ignore it.

Also note that the new Mossie's MIL starts out the same, well, 1mph slower, and ends up slightly faster.  The dip at 5,000ft is a dip.

Actually, it's not just a dip at 5000 ft. The difference is there form SL all the way up to 12 kft. The gap is widest at 8.5k, then gets narrower and at 12-13 k the speeds are almost identical.   
North of 13k the gap widens again, and at 15k there is again a clear advantage of almost 20 mph for the old Mossie. Unfortunatly the new graphs do not go above 15k, it would be interesting to see how the performance is at higher altitudes. 

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #28 on: May 14, 2010, 03:13:14 AM »
Does anyone have handy the weight of the old Mossi as tested for speed/climb?  The new model is lighter... but I cant find the exact figure for teh old model.  I've misplaced that sticky note.   :)

The new model is lighter indeed, but those 800 lbs will only make a minor difference on an 18000 lbs aircraft.
Actually, on MIL the climbrates have decreased by about 10%, on WEP they got a tiny bit better. This will vary at different altitudes though. 

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: New Mossi Performance. Wow.
« Reply #29 on: May 14, 2010, 03:41:50 AM »
Boozeman, at sea level the difference is 1mph.  At 5,000ft it is 13mph.  At 12,000ft it is 4mph in favor of the new one.  At 13,000ft it is 2mph in favor of the new one.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-