Author Topic: Spitfire Mk. IX LF  (Read 6751 times)

Offline SgtPappy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Spitfire Mk. IX LF
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2010, 11:00:01 PM »
Some documents I've read (summaries, albeit) stated that some IX's did indeed receive the bubble tops, but perhaps they meant Type 361 airframes received this mod late in the war; an airframe which encompassed both Mk.IXs and XVIs.

Another difference in the Merlin 66 vs the 266 from other docs I've read state that the 266 engages and disengages its 2nd stage impeller at slightly different alts than the 66. The performance of the XVI in-game is more or less identical to that of the in-game VIII, and these graphs actually show that the 2nd stage impeller engages at the same altitude as the Spitfire VIII's Merlin 66. Thus, chances are we actually DO have an LF.IXE and not a XVI.  :joystick:
I am a Spitdweeb

"Oh I have slipped the surly bonds of earth... Put out my hand and touched the face of God." -J.G. Magee Jr.

Offline kilo2

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3445
« Last Edit: June 03, 2010, 11:12:14 AM by kilo2 »
X.O. Kommando Nowotny
FlyKommando.com

"Never abandon the possibility of attack."

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Spitfire Mk. IX LF
« Reply #17 on: June 03, 2010, 12:48:11 PM »
Those are all Spit 5bs, though. :)

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Spitfire Mk. IX LF
« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2010, 03:20:13 PM »
Some documents I've read (summaries, albeit) stated that some IX's did indeed receive the bubble tops, but perhaps they meant Type 361 airframes received this mod late in the war; an airframe which encompassed both Mk.IXs and XVIs.

Another difference in the Merlin 66 vs the 266 from other docs I've read state that the 266 engages and disengages its 2nd stage impeller at slightly different alts than the 66. The performance of the XVI in-game is more or less identical to that of the in-game VIII, and these graphs actually show that the 2nd stage impeller engages at the same altitude as the Spitfire VIII's Merlin 66. Thus, chances are we actually DO have an LF.IXE and not a XVI.  :joystick:

Definitely were IXs with the cut down rear fuselage.  It could literally be a low back IX on the line followed by a low back XVI.  Can't find the thread at the moment but I posted photos of two such birds one serial number apart recently.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters