Author Topic: Firewall for Site to Site - SonicWALL TZ 100 - Vulcan, others?  (Read 557 times)

Offline Ghastly

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Does anyone have any comment or experience with using the SonicWALL TZ line (100 in particular) to establish a network of Site to Site VPN's? 

The Netgear's FVS318G's I've been using are a) limiting, in that I now have much more bandwidth than they have IPSEC bandwidth and an ever increasing nightly transfer size b) are causing problems with streaming video that doesn't happen through any other router we've used c) one of the three is getting flaky anyway, and I have to replace it.

Or does someone have a recommendation for a better $200-300 router with an IPSEC bandwidth of greater than about 15 Mbps or so?

Oh, and it must allow AH traffic ;) - one of them goes on my home network. Not that I get to play any more, but some day, I'll have time again!

<S> and thanks in advance for any input.

Guy

"Curse your sudden (but inevitable!) betrayal!"
Grue

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Firewall for Site to Site - SonicWALL TZ 100 - Vulcan, others?
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2010, 08:02:18 AM »
have a look at draytek 2820 series, I use them for site to site VPNs :aok

http://draytek.com/user/PdListbyCategory.php?action=LoadData&Typeid=25
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Ghastly

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Re: Firewall for Site to Site - SonicWALL TZ 100 - Vulcan, others?
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2010, 10:40:49 AM »
Thanks RTHolmes.  I looked at the link, but ended up orderering a pair of TZ 200's.  I can get them through my regular vendor, which means I can box them back up and send 'em back if I don't like what I get.

Thanks for the input though - they do look like they could be a decent solution.

<S>
"Curse your sudden (but inevitable!) betrayal!"
Grue

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9911
Re: Firewall for Site to Site - SonicWALL TZ 100 - Vulcan, others?
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2010, 07:31:55 PM »
TZ-100's/200's rock, they have dedicated crypt CPU's, so perform better than your run of the mill SOHO router. Draytek says it's hardware based VPN but doesn't put any spec's to it (which is odd).

Let me know if you have any questions with the 200's config :)

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Firewall for Site to Site - SonicWALL TZ 100 - Vulcan, others?
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2010, 08:09:19 AM »
the 2820s use Infineon (now Lantiq) Danube Dual MIPS 24KEc @333MHz chipset, although I believe there is a separate copro for encryption and others for running the network stack and other functions. enough power in other words :) never had a draytek fall over due to flood attacks where cheap home routers eventually give up, they just keep chugging along :aok

edit: chipset details here (2820s use the S version with the additional IPSec processor):
http://www.lantiq.com/uploads/tx_abzlantiqproducts/PB-e-0029-v1_lres_01.pdf
« Last Edit: May 31, 2010, 08:21:22 AM by RTHolmes »
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Ghastly

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Re: Firewall for Site to Site - SonicWALL TZ 100 - Vulcan, others?
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2010, 10:51:27 AM »
Thanks guys - Vulcan, good to know that you like them, given your experience.  I was torn between opting for the 200's and going with the 100's.  From what I could see, the 100's should have been more than powerful enough but... I opted for the "fix it once and forget it" solution for a few dollars more, rather than find out that the 100's were still limiting me.

Have a great holiday!

"Curse your sudden (but inevitable!) betrayal!"
Grue