Oh, I understand the difference but both have the same effect. To not want to know, is to not want to care.
I agree with you on Gun Cam footage BTW. 
My 4th amendment affords me the right to privacy. As long as that right is not violated, I will extend the same courtesy back to my country.
What is the effect that we need to be concerned about in this case, though?
The servicemen followed procedure, and were cleared to engage. This wasn't some slaughter of "innocents". The journalists knew exactly the danger they faced every day and what the consequences could be for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
As far as Reuters is concerned, I would think that since they are not a U.S. company, they have no rights to any of our government documents as per the FOIA. The FOIA was enacted to dictate that the government must be subservient to the citizens of the US with regard to disclosure with a total of (9) exceptions to the rule. It does not state that these records are available to just anyone but rather US Citizens only. I'm sure that this also does not include foreign businesses.
I fully understand the desire for accountability and transparency with regard to our government. I think it is a noble and forward thinking idea.
I do not, however, think that it should apply to our military. There no reason that electronic data concerning the procedures of our armed forces should be made available to ANY media.
Reuters knew full well that their employees faced danger every day. yet they want to know what happened to their employees .
Wrong place, wrong time.
Sorry about your luck.
If a few reporters bought the farm because they were too close to the action, it is not the fault of the US troops. They took the paycheck knowing the risks associated with the job. The only persons that should be held responsible for the children should be the parents.
I also have no shame in saying that the situation, with regard to the medical care of the children, was handled properly. Our resources should not be used for their medical care. Coffee is brewed at temperatures that can scald you and as such, should be handled with care. McDonald's should not be held responsible for one's lack of dexterity. In the same vein, bullets are likely to be flying around in an active battle zone and as such, should not be brought to one. Neither should we be held responsible for their medical treatment resulting from stupidity.
Humanitarian?
No.
I'm not a humanitarian, I think logically.