Author Topic: New announcement: Radar Settings  (Read 14395 times)

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #375 on: June 30, 2010, 05:28:41 PM »
Low level flying was accomplished in WW2.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ntknTCfsLY&NR=1
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #376 on: June 30, 2010, 07:06:39 PM »
high alt fights rule - no pickers :D
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Draggon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 101
      • vmf214blacksheep.webs.com
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #377 on: June 30, 2010, 09:28:19 PM »
I understand the reason for the low dar range, but having the dar ring out so far it even covers your own base is a little much. You can't even take off of your base on some maps without the enemy knowing just where your at. So they either need to make the base's further away from each other ( which no one will like ) or at least shorten the tower radar on maps where the bases are close to each other.   :airplane:
« Last Edit: June 30, 2010, 09:30:36 PM by Draggon »
CO VMF214 "BLACK SHEEP" Commanding
"Actually however the object isn't to bail out of your ship, but to make the other fellow bail out of his''

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10573
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #378 on: June 30, 2010, 09:30:02 PM »
I understand the reason for the low dar range, but having the dar ring out so far it even covers your own base is a little much. You can't even take off of your base on some maps without the enemy knowing just where your at. So they either need to make the base's further away from each other ( which no one will like ) or at least shorten the tower radar on maps where the bases ares so close to each other.   :airplane:
Or just flu NOE until it's time to climb. :bolt:

Offline Draggon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 101
      • vmf214blacksheep.webs.com
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #379 on: June 30, 2010, 09:33:31 PM »
Why should we have to noe off the base, we should be able to climb out to meet the enemy without the enemy seeing us on there radar just off our base. The tower radar is to close to enemy bases ( on some maps ).
CO VMF214 "BLACK SHEEP" Commanding
"Actually however the object isn't to bail out of your ship, but to make the other fellow bail out of his''

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #380 on: July 01, 2010, 01:02:25 AM »
On a scale of 1-10..........

1. Grizz doesn't care if someone announces on 200 from the tower at the field he is upping a J3 Cub with a Nerf Gun that he is on his way to fight you and he will tell you himself his location personally to let you get a 262.

10. NOE and radio silence is the only chance you will ever have to survive Grizz's J3 Cub.

Five and up to one just want to fight with whatever they fly, drive or cruise thru the water. POTW and AOM live by that philosophy in the game.

If you are complaining about the current radar situation because it's TOO reveling for whatever reason you are a six down to ten. Do you want to fight or not? Fighters have a common attiude. Whatever is thrown at them, they will adapt and overcome it. Why are you complaining?

Fight!
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6728
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #381 on: July 01, 2010, 06:28:01 AM »
As I can tell, since this has been put in place, there's a dedicated group of guys from each country who make a point of killing dar damn near EVERYwhere. As it stays down for 45 min.....not so much an issue as would first seem
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23864
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #382 on: July 01, 2010, 06:33:31 AM »
If you are complaining about the current radar situation because it's TOO reveling for whatever reason you are a six down to ten. Do you want to fight or not? Fighters have a common attiude. Whatever is thrown at them, they will adapt and overcome it. Why are you complaining?

Well, just remove base dar then and make dot dar arena wide, so you can see any dot, any time, anywhere. After all, do you want a fight or not? ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4019
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #383 on: July 01, 2010, 07:17:47 AM »
Well, just remove base dar then and make dot dar arena wide, so you can see any dot, any time, anywhere. After all, do you want a fight or not? ;)

Yep. So much for actually hunting.
Former C.O. 91st Bombardment Group (Heavy)
"The Ragged Irregulars"

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #384 on: July 01, 2010, 09:50:55 AM »
Well, just remove base dar then and make dot dar arena wide, so you can see any dot, any time, anywhere. After all, do you want a fight or not? ;)

They might as well ! The dar cirlcles are ridiculous.

And while they're at it, make the dar dots show differnt colors or something so I can tell what altitude they are at. :rock
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #385 on: July 01, 2010, 10:05:20 AM »
Well, just remove base dar then and make dot dar arena wide, so you can see any dot, any time, anywhere. After all, do you want a fight or not? ;)

Think we have that already.....lets see....WWI arena :x
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #386 on: July 01, 2010, 02:59:46 PM »
Sounds like HiTech will have to place a 200 perk price on "Nerf Guns" and charge Grizz $50 per/m with all this Hoopla over Radar...... :huh

No body wants to fly bombers above 12k to be safe.<---But, They want to fly under radar to undefended bases to be safe.
No body wants to be seen on radar to be safe.<---But, They want to pick once they get 12k over a furball to be safe.
No body wants to be seen attacking anything to be safe.<---But, They convince a suicide porker to ruin his own score now to take out all base dar for 6 local bases to be safe.
No body likes HiTech forceing them to fight in the light of day.<---With NOE they could sneak around with the illusion they were controlling some aspect of the fight in their favor.

So why don't those who dislike everyone else in the arena being able to see them now pettition HiTech to create a Star Trek space combat game with Klingon and Romulan cloakable rides so you can fly around invisible and shoot everyone else with no risk?.....That would be safe...right....... :rolleyes:

Oh, Sorry I forgot, eventualy in the Star Trek universe you could track those invisible ships on DAR by takion leak emissions...ooops<---not even this is safe...Oh well.... :rofl
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4019
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #387 on: July 01, 2010, 11:27:09 PM »
Was able to put some game time in tonight in LW Orange. 91st & company put up seven flights of B17's with volunteer escorts. Altitude leveled at only 18K. Targets were three Rook fields, specifically hangars. Rook resistance was sparse and easily supressed. Targets all hit with excellent results, one base retaken as a result. Granted, this is only one mission I'm addressing, but it seems so far, bombers are going to have an easy time of it. I hope you bad guys prove us wrong like you used to do. :) What happened? :O
Former C.O. 91st Bombardment Group (Heavy)
"The Ragged Irregulars"

Offline 68ZooM

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6337
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #388 on: July 02, 2010, 12:24:15 PM »
Altitude leveled at only 18K.

They were probally screaming on country what Alt monkeys you were   :rofl  :rofl   sounds like a fun run  :salute
UrSelf...Pigs On The Wing...Retired

Was me, I bumped a power cord. HiTEch

Offline Tarstar

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 380
Re: New announcement: Radar Settings
« Reply #389 on: July 02, 2010, 05:59:07 PM »
I say that the Win teh Warz guys should be happy that they even have an NOE option anymore the way they have abused it so much over the years.  I say take NOE out all together.  That will end the history debate - which is a silly debate anyway for a game that is far from historical in the MA.  

I think it would be fairly accurate to say that NOE, as an overused, dominating tactic, has be removed from the tool box.. Is it still possible? Yes, in certain situations especially on maps with lots of water.. Practical? Not really.. It is going to be interesting to see how it changes the dynamic of the game.. Hey I'm happy to admit that flying NOE was the very first thing I learned to do when I started out.. Most missions posted were NOE and they were fun.. Did my learning to really fly and fight suffer because of this, certainly..

Hitec, obviously felt this change was needed for his own reasons and I have no real qualm with it at all.. I'm still going to love the game.. But I don't think the complete and total banning of any "tactic" is a good idea.. The option to do many different things, hated or not, is what gives this game a diversity that is unique..  :salute