Author Topic: the panther  (Read 559 times)

Offline DERK13

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
the panther
« on: June 28, 2010, 09:03:35 PM »
the panther would be a good tankfor aceshigh nothing could bet it at a 1vs1 would be a good tank againest the tiger, idk the specifices about it but from what ive seen and heard this thing is crazy strong and kicks butt. it is said russians would capture them and se them as there own because they were so good i think they sad it has a 70mm cannon with the strongest armor
« Last Edit: June 28, 2010, 09:05:47 PM by DERK13 »

RedTail
 

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: the panther
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2010, 09:10:13 PM »
 :bolt:
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
Re: the panther
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2010, 10:17:23 PM »
The Panther would be a good tank for HTC to add in aceshigh.

No other tank could beat it 1vs1.

It would be a good tank to use against the tiger.

While I don't know the specifics of the Panther, I have heard it has excellent armor and a powerful main gun.

When the Russians managed to capture a Panther they would use them against the Germans.

The Panther was that good.

I think think it had a 70mm main gun with the strongest armor of any tank in WW2, but I am not sure.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2010, 10:19:05 PM by WMLute »
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: the panther
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2010, 11:08:18 PM »
The Panther would be a good tank for HTC to add in aceshigh.

No other tank could beat it 1vs1.

It would be a good tank to use against the tiger.

While I don't know the specifics of the Panther, I have heard it has excellent armor and a powerful main gun.

When the Russians managed to capture a Panther they would use them against the Germans.

The Panther was that good.

I think think it had a 70mm main gun with the strongest armor of any tank in WW2, but I am not sure.

oh, i see... ty lute, i can't read squeaker :aok

Quote
The sloping armor of the German Panther tank was a response to a similar feature on the Russian T-34, although the basic Panther design traces its roots back to the pre-war years. Pursuing this process of one-upmanship, the Germans created the best tank of the Second World War when they introduced the Panther in January 1943. It was deployed in time for the battle of Kursk, its first major engagement.

The Panther was a medium tank with decent speed, satisfactory reliability, heavy German FHA 80-85mm sloped frontal armor and very good firepower. The Panther's high velocity 75mm gun could penetrate the armor of all Allied tanks, making it a lethal adversary. The tank's top speed was 28 MPH. The Panther's design featured a torsion bar suspension system and interleaved wheels, which allowed it to go practically anywhere. Some 4814 Panthers were produced before the end of the war.

It was a particularly dangerous foe for the American, Canadian and British Sherman tanks, which were simply no match for the Panther. The Panther was faster, more reliable, more maneuverable and could go more places than its larger running mate, the Tiger tank. Its sloped armor gave it nearly the immune zone of the heavier Tiger.

Had Germany won the war, I believe that the Panther would today have a service record and longevity comparable to that achieved by the Russian T-34. As they say, winning is everything.
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: the panther
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2010, 03:28:53 AM »
A little thing from wiki about it's gun:

"The main gun was a 7.5 cm Rheinmetall-Borsig  KwK 42 (L/70) with 79 rounds (82 on Ausf. G) with semi-automatic shell ejection. The main gun used three different types of ammunition, APCBC-HE (Pzgr. 39/42), HE (Sprgr. 42) and APCR (Pzgr. 40/42), the last of which was usually in short supply. While it was of only average caliber for its time, the Panther's gun was one of the most powerful tank guns of WWII, due to the large propellant charge and the long barrel, which gave it a very high muzzle velocity and excellent armor-piercing qualities. The flat trajectory also made hitting targets much easier, since accuracy was less sensitive to range. The Panther's 75 mm gun had more penetrating power than the main gun of the Tiger I heavy tank, the 8.8 cm KwK 36 L/56,[52]  although the larger 88 mm projectile might inflict more damage if it did penetrate.[53]"

If anything, it would probably be perked at what the Tiger sits at now, and the Tiger's perk price would drop by 5-10.  I wouldn't drop it any lower than 10, since it DOES have a good amount of armor.  With excellent armor and a deadlier gun than our Tiger, it's going to definitely be perked.  I foresee the demise of many a T-34 by the oh so beautiful Panther.  :devil   :x
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: the panther
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2010, 04:14:07 AM »
The Panther was a great tank which incorporated many of the best features of the T-34 such as sloping armour and a powerful 75mm main gun - but it was rather prone to breaking down, which is why not a few of them were captured by the Soviets. Some sims reproduce the unpredictability the war by programming-in the occasional breakdown (this ol' cat recalls his IL-2 I-16's engine stopping on climb-out and plunging to his death in the forest beyond the airfield), maybe HT might consider doing the same for AH aircraft and AFVs to add to the immersion factor?

 :cool:

Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline xavrikx

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: the panther
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2010, 11:51:57 AM »
+1

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: the panther
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2010, 02:43:09 PM »
the panther would be a good tankfor aceshigh nothing could bet it at a 1vs1

Out of the tanks we have in AH, the Firefly could meet the Panther 1v1 and have a very reasonable expectation of winning. The 76mm Sherman using APCBC ammunition can score a kill on a Panther with a shot to its mantlet or flank.  Of the tanks we don't have, there were numerous ones that could defeat the Panther in a 1v1 engagement that include such vehicles as the M36 tank destroyer (with its 90mm main gun), Pershing and even Super Pershing tanks.  The Soviets also fielded a tank or two that were able to defeat the Panther in a 1v1 engagement.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline druski85

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1212
Re: the panther
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2010, 03:03:45 PM »
The Panther would be a good tank for HTC to add in aceshigh.

No other tank could beat it 1vs1.

It would be a good tank to use against the tiger.

While I don't know the specifics of the Panther, I have heard it has excellent armor and a powerful main gun.

When the Russians managed to capture a Panther they would use them against the Germans.

The Panther was that good.

I think think it had a 70mm main gun with the strongest armor of any tank in WW2, but I am not sure.


Well done, sir.  I'd mark that as a foreign language skill on the old resume.  Your translation abilities will become more and more coveted into the near future.   :uhoh

Anyway, good looking tank to bomb.  +1

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: the panther
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2010, 03:31:46 PM »
This reminds me of back before I was in the 2nd grade, and knew how to make sentences Flow.
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: the panther
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2010, 03:35:34 PM »
I would say yes to the Panther because it is a wonderful tank, with enough suspension to glide over Belgium Blocks and sheep all day with the ability to shoot straight. Very accurate tank gun with a GREAT range of about 3,000 ft and further. Decent armor, all around great tank.
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>