I guess I needed to prove my point again about ESET over McAfee (Mc Crappie). Below is a link to a PDF that is put out by Passmark Software (Google them). They are a software evaluation company. The PDF is complete with live links to each of the makers website of the software reviewed. ESET beat McAfee in speed, size, ability to catch, lesser false positives etc etc.
Since NOD32 of any flavor has been made it has never been by passed by an "In-The-Wild" virus (this is a new virus reported by at least two independent sources), where as McAfee has over 70 failures.
The Link for the report http://www.tdcomputersystems.com/passmark_june_2010.pdf
TD
LOL I've seen NOD32 miss stuff (I tried nod for a couple of years), plus the AV Comparatives retrospective test gives it a 52%, that means 48% of new virus's got past the sig set at the time. 52% is still a good score, but it highlights your comment about in the wild virus's vs nod32 is pure BS.
AND... AND... (this is the good part) the Passmark review you linked too does NOT review the Enterprise product LOL (it also references the AV Comps tests which also do NOT test the Enterprise product).
I seriously doubt your experience with the Enterprise product if you cannot tell the difference from the screenshots shown in that passmark report. McAfee do several products, there's the retail consumer stuff, small business (total protection) package (seems to come in two flavours btw), then the enterprise product. The enterprise product is significantly different too the others. It does AV, AS is optional, and in 8.5i includes the artemis engine which is extremely good at finding new threats (unfortunately AV Comparatives do not test from what I can see, nor do they test enterprise).
I sell security solutions from SMB through to Large Enterprise/Goverment. So my name is on the line too

. Yes for retail and smb clients Nod32 is the choice - mcafee enterprise is not a viable choice for these users (min 25 node license iirc).