Author Topic: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.  (Read 5083 times)

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10573
FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« on: September 04, 2010, 01:35:13 PM »
OK I think this aircraft will fall under the 190A-5 category? I have two of the same photo but from two different books plus a profile.
So who ever wants to do it claim it now.

One request though please if you can't do this skin justice don't claim it because you want credit for a cool Luft skin.












































Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8379
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2010, 05:10:27 PM »
That is a good find....it looks like a clown.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #2 on: September 04, 2010, 10:17:11 PM »
The A-3 is a bit of a stretch on the A-5 airframe. We might have one already skinned, but the early models were a little bit different.

Also, with the small position of the mouth, it would stretch horribly. I know this because I skinned Herman Graff's tulip-pattern onto that plane! It's a left-and-right stretch so you would have no details whatsoever in this area. At best you could do the eyes. That isn't too impressive.

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2010, 02:48:04 PM »
I wonder if HTC will fix the 3D modeling of the engine cowling on the 190 radials? They look a bit too blocky. If so, it might help tame the stretching issues that you skinners have on the nose of the plane. Neat plane profile, lyric1!
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"

Axis vs Allies

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2010, 04:39:00 PM »
That is a good find....it looks like a clown.

Does look rather cheeky.
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline Megalodon

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2010, 12:09:55 AM »
they do seem to smile at ya..


Have another


Okay..Add 2 Country's at once, Australia and France next plane update Add ...CAC Boomerang and the Dewoitine D.520

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8379
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2010, 02:06:34 AM »
Looking at it more, it reminds me of one of the kid rides at the fair. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2010, 09:05:20 PM »
It mentions training school, and fledglings. I'd bet it's not a combat plane. Also it's an A-1 despite what the captions above say, you can see this. The A-1 didn't have the MG151/20s ready, so the inboard guns were 7m MG17s. It had 4 synchronized MG17s and 2 outboard MG/FFs. On top of that the A-1 was a very different plane from the A-5 we have in game.

I'd say it doesn't even remotely fit, based on all this.

EDIT: Correction, the first one was an A-1, that's what I was thinking of. The one below that (in Megalodon's post) has MG151/20s, and the one below that is some bastardized censored/airbrushed version of the plane that doesn't even resemble a Fw190.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 09:07:38 PM by Krusty »

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2010, 09:26:12 PM »
It mentions training school, and fledglings. I'd bet it's not a combat plane. Also it's an A-1 despite what the captions above say, you can see this. The A-1 didn't have the MG151/20s ready, so the inboard guns were 7m MG17s. It had 4 synchronized MG17s and 2 outboard MG/FFs. On top of that the A-1 was a very different plane from the A-5 we have in game.

I'd say it doesn't even remotely fit, based on all this.

EDIT: Correction, the first one was an A-1, that's what I was thinking of. The one below that (in Megalodon's post) has MG151/20s, and the one below that is some bastardized censored/airbrushed version of the plane that doesn't even resemble a Fw190.

Well, we've got P-47D-30 skins on the P-47D-40, P-47C skins on the P-47D11, F6F-3 skins on the F6F-5, etc.  I figure if HTC will let that kind of stuff slide, then what's the matter with an A-1/3 skin on an A-5? 
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2010, 09:28:10 PM »
The early Fw190s had severe engine issues, overheating, teething problems... Their speed was slower and their boost was lower. On top of that the A-1s had a mere fraction of the firepower that the A-5 would have available.

It would be akin to putting a 109E-7 skin on a 109F-4 airframe.

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10573
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2010, 12:40:37 AM »
Another picture I found with similar markings. The picture was captioned France 1942? For what that is worth.


Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2010, 06:26:14 AM »
The early Fw190s had severe engine issues, overheating, teething problems... Their speed was slower and their boost was lower. On top of that the A-1s had a mere fraction of the firepower that the A-5 would have available.

It would be akin to putting a 109E-7 skin on a 109F-4 airframe.

The F6F-3 didn't have water injection, nor did the P-47C or the early D's.  The D-23 skins we have in the D-11 pool had substantially better performance than the D-11 out of the factory.  About the only thing that stayed consistent was airframe and gun armament.

Just saying that, given HTCs previous flexibility on other models, you could probably make a case for this skin, especially since it has a unique, interesting look that would bring something new to the 190A5 skin collection.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1528
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2010, 06:52:23 AM »
A5 already has quite a few skins, and while i'm all for new ones, i'd prefer that they be actual A5 skins, not the kid-touching clown look of that A1.  it's not scary looking, it's creepy!  it looks like it's dying to give you some candy and invite you inside....weeeeeeird
-AoM-

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #13 on: September 08, 2010, 10:28:10 PM »
Stoney, I get what you're saying... But I think some airframes are very different and others are very similar. As the Fw190 is one of my favorite planes in WW2 (not just in this game) I would say it is very different, personally, in this case. Maybe I'm a bit biased, maybe not.

Plus the other side of it is the training ride (non-combat), and the fact that it really couldn't be skinned well to begin with (stretching), overall the entire package is a big "no" for me in regards to how it qualifies for AH.

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10573
Re: FW-190A-3 5/JG1. Shark Mouth.
« Reply #14 on: September 08, 2010, 10:41:59 PM »
Stoney, I get what you're saying... But I think some airframes are very different and others are very similar. As the Fw190 is one of my favorite planes in WW2 (not just in this game) I would say it is very different, personally, in this case. Maybe I'm a bit biased, maybe not.

Plus the other side of it is the training ride (non-combat), and the fact that it really couldn't be skinned well to begin with (stretching), overall the entire package is a big "no" for me in regards to how it qualifies for AH.
The training part is a little in question I think. Some web sites state that it is unknown if that particular aircraft was a full time trainer or not that Megaoldon posted? The aircraft I posted is not the same as his. Personally I don't care much either way I shall leave it to the skinners & HTC to decide it's fate.