Author Topic: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem  (Read 3931 times)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2010, 08:20:31 PM »
i saw on military channel or history channel that p47m were only used to chase low alt V1 rockets.

That's not correct. And yes, TV is about the worst source for any knowledge about military history, military technology or any kind of knowledge at all ;)

I thought p47m would be faster only at low alt, like tempest :headscratch:

It was still a high performance and superb high altitude fighter (once the bugs were ironed out)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2010, 08:26:24 PM »
i saw on military channel or history channel that p47m were only used to chase low alt V1 rockets.
I thought p47m would be faster only at low alt, like tempest :headscratch:
Why?  It didn't chase V1s and it has the same engine as the P-47N.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Baumer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
      • 332nd Flying Mongrels
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2010, 08:46:31 PM »
If you read the Report of Joint Fighter Conference from 16-23 October 1944, NAS Pax River, at the end of the conference it was voted the best fighter over 25,000 feet.
HTC Please show the blue planes some love!
F4F-4, FM2, SBD-5, TBM-3

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #18 on: September 17, 2010, 04:21:22 AM »
Looking at the form of the "cookie" it was hardly a pinpoint weapon having any kind of stabilizing surfaces, so dropped from 30k the bomb likely had a considerable dispersion from sighting point. But of course we do not have that problem in AH and we can put an eye out of a CV gunner if we desire.  ;)

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #19 on: September 17, 2010, 05:46:09 AM »

Only once (in 8 hours flying time!) a Ta 152H was able to catch me @ 28k - after chasing me for 7 sectors in dot vis range! I was dragging him to my own factories, did a high speed dive & some evasives, and got home with a proxy kill. :)



Please give us more details. Did the 152 run ito you at alt or did he he climb up from lower alt? How far could he close the gap? Did you bomb target in the meantime? Did you use WEP often?

Thanks!

Offline Zygote404

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 161
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #20 on: September 17, 2010, 06:08:17 AM »
109 K4 climbs much faster and its much faster till 40k.  I had no problem killing a mossie I found co-alt yesterday even in a dive.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/planeperf.php?gtype=2&pw=2&p1=110&p2=1&submitButtonName=Generate+Chart
« Last Edit: September 17, 2010, 06:09:54 AM by Zygote404 »

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #21 on: September 17, 2010, 06:26:38 AM »
Did the 152 run ito you at alt or did he he climb up from lower alt?
He was initally lower than me, can't tell how much exactly. I was quite far in enemy airspace, almost close to Bish/Rook border (I was Knight).
I think he was taking off from a nearby 4k base while I was making my way from Rook town to town. I had botched one target approach, so I ventured further inland towards his darbar. I think if I had been more attentive/cautious I could have totally avoided him, but my concentration was a bit slipping after a full day of Mosquito flying. ;)


How far could he close the gap?
He did catch me, after a 7 sector chase

Did you bomb target in the meantime?
Yes, I bombed my last target while I was being hunted. No reason to waste those bombs

Did you use WEP often?
I used up my 5 mins of WEP towards the end of the chase.

« Last Edit: September 17, 2010, 06:33:56 AM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #22 on: September 17, 2010, 06:37:51 AM »
109 K4 climbs much faster and its much faster till 40k.  I had no problem killing a mossie I found co-alt yesterday even in a dive.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/newscores/planeperf.php?gtype=2&pw=2&p1=110&p2=1&submitButtonName=Generate+Chart

That's the trick - finding one co-alt ;)

But few people are patrolling at that altitude. And if you are taking off for a 28k mossie already on dar, you will have a hard time to catch up, especially if the Mossie driver is keeping attention to the darbars and changing course.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Zygote404

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 161
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #23 on: September 17, 2010, 06:51:10 AM »
Oh I see the problem now then.  One I found was around 18k from memory. Didn't realize they could bomb properly from that height.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2010, 07:16:03 AM »
Oh I see the problem now then.  One I found was around 18k from memory. Didn't realize they could bomb properly from that height.

18k is quite low. The optimum altitude for the Mossie is 28k. If keeping WEP for the chase, a 109K needs about 11 minutes to reach 28K, during which a loaded Mossie will cover about 60 miles - more than 2 sectors. The 109K will have to plan ahead, and if the Mossie pilot isn't going for the factories (why should he? Predictable, ack infested, less yield in points) he can quite easily change course & target.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2010, 08:11:34 AM »
The Mossie XVI is beautiful isn't it? I'm in love again ...

It looks like a bit of a game changer though - a flight will make a CV's day not-so-happy so quickly, and a lot more towns will find themselves with no town centre much more often.

The 4K cookie couldn't have been that accurate when dropped from high alt, so to mitigate the Mossie's awesome performance a little I think the cookie should be made to be a bit more erratic when dropped. Having said that - we'd need some evidence to that effect and I can't find any reliable sources.
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2010, 08:16:14 AM »
It looks like a bit of a game changer though - a flight will make a CV's day not-so-happy so quickly,


I don't think it will see that much usage in the anti-CV role in the long run. The Mossie have to come down for that, being easy prey for patrolling fighters then.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2010, 08:34:25 AM »
Oh I see the problem now then.  One I found was around 18k from memory. Didn't realize they could bomb properly from that height.

oh, they can.. yesterday I took up a single with 6x500 and took out 6 radars from 30K..
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #28 on: September 17, 2010, 09:13:41 AM »

I don't think it will see that much usage in the anti-CV role in the long run. The Mossie have to come down for that, being easy prey for patrolling fighters then.

Why do they have to come down? 3 x 4k cookies from 30k ...
Although the CV will have a lot more time to turn, they often don't - especially if they don't realise they're Mossies.
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: New Mossi thoughts - the interception problem
« Reply #29 on: September 17, 2010, 09:23:31 AM »
Why do they have to come down? 3 x 4k cookies from 30k ...

Will rarely have success, unless the CV his running in a straight line long enough to line up & drop (a cookie takes about 50 seconds from drop to impact at 30k)
It's almost a freak occurrence. Also take into account that it would take a Mossie about 30 minutes to get in such an attack position.

It's very rare in the MA to see a CV being sunk by bombers considerable higher than 12k.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!