UFO's real?

[Jayhawk]

I try really hard to not look down on other people's beliefs, but the idea of giant humans is, IMO, ridiculous. After about 5 minutes of searching, I found this article;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071214-giant-skeleton.html ;which included this picture:



Which was in that YouTube link.  However the YouTube video conveniently cuts out the Worth1000.com (ironically the same site I used that old Nicolas Cage picture) which is a website for those creative artists who doctor pictures.

Come on.

[MORAY37]

also along with this when these beings had sex with the human race the babies were giants according to the story and there is physical evidence and here it is, these bi-terrestial humans were 30 to 60 feet tall I think they've even found one over 100 feet tall- getting interresting huh I've studied this topic for a long time

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-8bVEIVUh8&feature=related

Annunaski
Is an ancient alien civilization that has a 3600 year orbit around our Sun on their planet a brown dwarf star.  The ancient story is that these alien species needed to harvest gold to put in their atmosphere as a shield to the Suns rays at the closest point of their 3600 year orbit.  Instead of doing the work themselves they genetically engineered the human race as a slave race to themselves to harvest gold.  Some say that is way we have genetic defects like only being able to use 10% of our brain power.  

Seriously?  Please tell me that you are just yanking some chain here....

10% of our brains....LMAO

http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent.asp

Also, interesting take on the Eye of Providence, on the dollar bill.  

We are seriously heading for "Idiocracy" if people actually buy into this crap.  I'm sorry if you wasted more than three minutes of your time "studying" this.  

[Tupac]

mmmmkay

[grizz441]

Seriously?  Please tell me that you are just yanking some chain here....

10% of our brains....LMAO

http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent.asp

For how long that article was, there wasn't much actual fact in it. 

[TnDep]

Seriously?  Please tell me that you are just yanking some chain here....

10% of our brains....LMAO

http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent.asp

Also, interesting take on the Eye of Providence, on the dollar bill.   

We are seriously heading for "Idiocracy" if people actually buy into this crap.  I'm sorry if you wasted more than three minutes of your time "studying" this. 

Eye of Providence the surrounding light of glory within a triangle?  Why would God use a triangle above a pyramid ? trinity- Father,Son, and Holy Spirit - When was this story written? or even better when was the bible written?  These stories of Annunaki date back to 5000 bc during the Summerian period

On the seal, the Eye is surrounded by the words Annuit Cœptis, meaning "He approves (or has approved) [our] undertakings", and Novus Ordo Seclorum, meaning "New Order of the Ages". The Eye is positioned above an unfinished pyramid with thirteen steps, representing the original thirteen states and the future growth of the country. The lowest level of the pyramid shows the year 1776 in Roman numerals. The combined implication is that the Eye, or God, favors the prosperity of the United States

Notice how the 13 states also tranfers to the mayan calendar and the 13 levels/cycles which is shaped like the pyramid.  It also refers back to my earlier statment of 13 months instead of 12, why throughout our history has everyone said 13 is an unlucky number it is the end of the Mayan Calendar and the return of the Annunaki possibly? These are stories just like the bible they are stories to us but since you knew about the Eye of Providence I'd say your a believer in God the Almighty eh? Walking in Faith and not by Fact ?

You can believe whatever way you want to believe but how do we really know what story is true.  In the bible it says we walk by faith not by sight so we have to believe without seeing. 

We are seriously heading for "Idiocracy" if people actually buy into this crap.  I'm sorry if you wasted more than three minutes of your time "studying" this. 

I've spent a whole lot more then 3 minutes researching this topic and thanks for the idiocracy remark.  You may want to do some research we only use around 10% of our brain's potential lol because all you showed me was one little article you looked up and believed as truth.  I can give you references if you can't find any.

[TnDep]

I try really hard to not look down on other people's beliefs, but the idea of giant humans is, IMO, ridiculous. After about 5 minutes of searching, I found this article;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/12/071214-giant-skeleton.html ;which included this picture:

(Image removed from quote.)

Which was in that YouTube link.  However the YouTube video conveniently cuts out the Worth1000.com (ironically the same site I used that old Nicolas Cage picture) which is a website for those creative artists who doctor pictures.

Come on.

If we didn't know about dinosaur fossils would we believe they exsisted.  It's hard to believe the world we live in today that any of these dinosaurs ever walked the earth but for some reason the earth's living things down sized a lot.  Wonder why? I don't know but thanks for the link proves that picture and the others wrong but doesn't say giants never exsisted.  It might be ridiculous but could be true but I'd think fossil remains would have been found by now if it were

I've also looked at Megalodons an extinct shark about 50-65 feet long to me that is ridiculous
http://www.fossils-facts-and-finds.com/megalodon.html
larger then a 18wheeler and weighing more at about 48 tons

So nothing is really ridiculous if proven fact, am I right?

[Plawranc]

This is one very long winded and pointless discussion. For some very good reasons.

1. - The planet Earth shows no signs of being anything else other than a planet possesing the capability of supporting life. It still functions like a regular planet with a core, crust and gravitational pull orbiting around a concentrated ball of energy.

2. - We are only capable of point one because our gravitational state and time scale is at exactly the right balance or in short, we were in the right place at the right time.

3. - In a galaxy there are MILLIONS of almost identical balls of energy each of them more than likely possessing planets in their orbit. And that is just one galaxy, we know of at least 7 in our current visual range possibly more beyond them. And in each of them there are millions of stars. so say we call it 500 million stars in each. thats 3500 MILLION stars. And most of them contain planets or planetoids in their orbit. If we assume we are the only life in the universe, its a 1 in an (lets face it) INFINITE chance that we are alone. But if you open your mind, give or take a few figures. Scientific research states that in theory, in all KNOWN galaxies there has to be at least 2 million planets capable of supporting life.

( Before some of you hit me with technicalities, I want to make this CLEAR, this is only a theoretical and scientific guess at the subject matter, I did not search the exact number of stars and so on, but the fact remains that in logical theory this stands up )

That is one hell of a big figure, to assume we are the only conscious creatures in this universe is not only stupid, but downright arrogant. But weather we actually meet these beings or not, is one entirely different question, one which can only be answered in time.

[Charge]

"big brother does not take kindly to lil troopers talking without permission."

If the military would charge these people AFTER they have told about their experiences that would pretty much confirm that they have been telling the truth, or at least something of importance. I think that what happens to these people is that their stories are pretty much ignored and their career is also pretty much over as they are labeled as "delusional" or with some suitable medical term. So as they come out and tell the truth they enter a sort of void where they are unable to confirm what they have told and thus they have no future in their profession and even the majority of civilian audience think they have a loose screw. Usually the only people who are genuinely interested are a bunch of weirdos who would pretty much believe anything anybody would say to fill their said "hunger for knowledge" (read: the lack of meaning in their own life). That also means that regardless of whether the information is correct it naturally enters a factual void where it remains until official confirmation can be presented, and the only officials that could do it have no interest to do such thing because it is nonsense -and even if it wasn't they can still control its validity in public eyes.

So even if something those people would tell us would be true, this system will quite effectively keep many many of people who might have something very interesting stories to tell to keep those stories to themselves.

So the system works just fine.

-C+

[TnDep]

This is one very long winded and pointless discussion. For some very good reasons.

1. - The planet Earth shows no signs of being anything else other than a planet possesing the capability of supporting life. It still functions like a regular planet with a core, crust and gravitational pull orbiting around a concentrated ball of energy.

2. - We are only capable of point one because our gravitational state and time scale is at exactly the right balance or in short, we were in the right place at the right time.

3. - In a galaxy there are MILLIONS of almost identical balls of energy each of them more than likely possessing planets in their orbit. And that is just one galaxy, we know of at least 7 in our current visual range possibly more beyond them. And in each of them there are millions of stars. so say we call it 500 million stars in each. thats 3500 MILLION stars. And most of them contain planets or planetoids in their orbit. If we assume we are the only life in the universe, its a 1 in an (lets face it) INFINITE chance that we are alone. But if you open your mind, give or take a few figures. Scientific research states that in theory, in all KNOWN galaxies there has to be at least 2 million planets capable of supporting life.

( Before some of you hit me with technicalities, I want to make this CLEAR, this is only a theoretical and scientific guess at the subject matter, I did not search the exact number of stars and so on, but the fact remains that in logical theory this stands up )

That is one hell of a big figure, to assume we are the only conscious creatures in this universe is not only stupid, but downright arrogant. But weather we actually meet these beings or not, is one entirely different question, one which can only be answered in time.

I agree with ya


I know you just threw some numbers out there but just 7 galaxies is not even close, this picutre alone each different light you see is it's own galaxy this is from the hubble telescope amazing picture can't look at it enough estimated 10,000 galaxies just in this picutre

Astronomers think that there are hundreds of billions galaxies in the universe, however the exact number is not known. But astronomers should know how many galaxies we’ve actually seen and discovered, right? Well, not necessarily. “We don’t know,” says Ed Churchwell, professor of astronomy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “We know it’s a very large number.” In just one image for example, the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, above, there are about 10,000 galaxies visible

information link http://www.universetoday.com/36610/how-many-galaxies-have-we-discovered/

[mechanic]

creation is a cruel joke and life is the punchline.

[Plawranc]

Lol thanks TN, I do know that there are tonnes, but there are 7 ones CLOSE to us, I know I should have elaborated a bit. But I knew technicalities would arrive. Thanks for the cool info!

And yes Batfink, after the past 2 weeks, that statement rings so loud and true it seems impossible. And yet fact.

[FLOTSOM]

"big brother does not take kindly to lil troopers talking without permission."

If the military would charge these people AFTER they have told about their experiences that would pretty much confirm that they have been telling the truth, or at least something of importance. I think that what happens to these people is that their stories are pretty much ignored and their career is also pretty much over as they are labeled as "delusional" or with some suitable medical term. So as they come out and tell the truth they enter a sort of void where they are unable to confirm what they have told and thus they have no future in their profession and even the majority of civilian audience think they have a loose screw. Usually the only people who are genuinely interested are a bunch of weirdos who would pretty much believe anything anybody would say to fill their said "hunger for knowledge" (read: the lack of meaning in their own life). That also means that regardless of whether the information is correct it naturally enters a factual void where it remains until official confirmation can be presented, and the only officials that could do it have no interest to do such thing because it is nonsense -and even if it wasn't they can still control its validity in public eyes.

So even if something those people would tell us would be true, this system will quite effectively keep many many of people who might have something very interesting stories to tell to keep those stories to themselves.

So the system works just fine.

-C+

In most cases you would be absolutely correct. any random and independent sightings would in general be allowed to die the death of "he is just a nut".

but the difference in this story is that military personnel came forward and said that our nuclear weapons were subject to having an unknown person or persons taking control of them. do you have any idea how bad a thought that is to the mind of those that grew up in the age of fear of nuclear war? if they can shut off our missiles and control our computers at will then they can launch those same missiles at us or any other target of their choosing at any time they choose.

further more the implication is that there is a means to control those computers by an outside source, thus the thought that any terrorist group or hostile government could control these weapons becomes a valid and substantial fear. how long would it take for the screaming of the public at large to demand that our military machine be torn down? think on that concept, our strongest weapons are constantly under protest by a radical few to begin with, what happens when millions of additional voices get added to those cries? don't fool yourself into thinking that this couldn't happen, hell look at our new "health care" bill as a screaming example of what mass hysteria on any subject can do. (that is not an implication of the correctness or validity of the bill, its mentioning is only to show that if the voices scream loud enough then anything can be made to happen)

the point being that if our own weapons, our greatest defense, could quickly become our very undoing then the public would demand the destruction of them. this is why there is such an out cry against biological weapons, the risk that if the genie ever got out of the bottle we may not be able to control it, and there may be no putting it back in. if the fear that we could not control our own nuclear weapons was based on some semblance of fact, (i.e. a supportable story promoted by military personnel) or even perceived fact, the out cry to dismantle them would be too loud to ignore. think of the implication of America in the modern world with its nuclear deterant program. this is the biggest reason for the government not only to crush this story if it had any basis in truth, but to put the story tellers and any who were a part of it into a black hole so deep even the aliens couldn't ever find them again.

[Jayhawk]

If we didn't know about dinosaur fossils would we believe they exsisted.  It's hard to believe the world we live in today that any of these dinosaurs ever walked the earth but for some reason the earth's living things down sized a lot.  Wonder why? I don't know but thanks for the link proves that picture and the others wrong but doesn't say giants never exsisted.  It might be ridiculous but could be true but I'd think fossil remains would have been found by now if it were

I've also looked at Megalodons an extinct shark about 50-65 feet long to me that is ridiculous
http://www.fossils-facts-and-finds.com/megalodon.html
larger then a 18wheeler and weighing more at about 48 tons
(Image removed from quote.)
So nothing is really ridiculous if proven fact, am I right?

We believe in dinosaurs BECAUSE the fossils exist.  There is evidence it exists, there is evidence a 50 foot shark existed, there is not evidence giant humans existed.  I believe one theory on the size of the dinosaurs links to the level of Oxygen in the air,  a higher rate of oxygen could foster bigger growth.

It's not research when you only read things that back up your opinion and discredit anything that doesn't.  To believe a megalodon didn't exist even when we have physical evidence but to believe giant humans did with no evidence is ridiculous.

[Reaper90]

All the "smart people," circa 1400 AD

"To believe that the world is not flat and the universe does not revolve around earth is ludicrous. It is well documented fact that only complete nothingness lies beyond what we know to be the 'edge' of the earth, and there are no lands and no peoples beyond the sea. We know this to be fact because no one has ever provided evidence AT ALL to the contrary. We have seen no evidence to indicate that any such lands exist, and surely no other beings exist, because we know they have not visited us and left evidence of their presence. Anyone who thinks that the earth is 'round' and that there is anything but death beyond the edge of our flat earth is at best a fool and at worst insane."

[sarcasm]Surely intelligent life beyond our imagination cannot exist and undoubtably it has never visited earth. [/sarcasm]

[Jayhawk]

TnDep, I'm still waiting for some evidence, can you cite some of this research?  Give me a scholarly article, give me a link to a book I can go to the library and read.  NOT YouTube links.  If all this has really been around for so long, surely there has to be information before the internet and before YouTube. 

What do you got?