Author Topic: Who didn't vote for B29  (Read 5702 times)

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #270 on: November 13, 2010, 09:49:06 PM »
You can lead a horse to water......

Which is entirely beside the point of my post.  Maybe you ought to consider remedial English courses instead of earning perk points...
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #271 on: November 14, 2010, 12:13:10 AM »
I'm wondering if we will get the B-29H, which was the one with some structural enhancements and dive brakes for divebombing.  I'm looking forward to those 12 forward firing 50-cal MG's, 10 forward firing 20 mm cannon, 8 forward firing 40 mm, and the capabilty to carry 60 HVAR rockets under the wings.  I'm just wondering if they'll model the Sperry Target Master divebomb sight, which allows pickling off single 1000 lb-ers, predicting accurately where they will hit on the ground no matter what the aerial maneuver being done at the time.  Should be awesome.

You forgot to add the 150 production H models that had the 105mm pack howitzer in the nose.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #272 on: November 14, 2010, 01:54:40 AM »
Here is a better question........... I wasn't here in 2000.........  WTF is this?

35 gents joined this event  (Image removed from quote.)
I believe you had good time. Thank you all.

Also Available my site. Film Links are there.
AAR Tokyo Daily Life

After Action Report:
Tokyo Daily Life

Round 1: 07:30 10/JUNE/45
Number of players
USAAF=21 IJN=14
Modifications of Rules
USAAF CO can change plane type balance.
IJN take off time changes to T+8min.

Result
USAAF rating is Good.
Primaly target Musashi factory(HQ) destroyed completely.
IJN rating is Poor.
USAAF got Good rating.

Round 2: 14:30 10/JUNE/45
Number of players
USAAF=19 IJN=14
Modifications of Rules
USAAF CO can change plane type balance.
IJN take off time changes to T+5min (Default Rule).
USAAF Primaly target changes to Ammo Complex.

Result
USAAF rating is Fair.
Primaly target Ammo Complex destroyed 52%.(13 of B29s flied this round. 100% needed for Good. 50% needed for Fair.)

IJN rating is Fair.
USAAF got Fair rating.

Story
USAAF HQ reported this raid as usual. 50% loss of B29 at 2nd wave iwas recomended. But they never change anytactics or strategy.
Japanese News Paper 'News Rising Sun' report this battle Overhelming Victory of IJN intercepters. But they never report destruction of factories.
This was special for pilots who flied there. But this was usual for both countries.
It's Tokyo Daily Life.

Dazs Tokyo JapanFESSE
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #273 on: November 14, 2010, 11:21:21 AM »
Me, either time, beaufighter and me410
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright