Author Topic: Base Capture Tweak from ChangeUp  (Read 2449 times)

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Base Capture Tweak from ChangeUp
« Reply #45 on: November 30, 2010, 01:36:29 PM »
UDP Streams versus TCP connections. The more environment pointer updates that have to be communicated the more UDP stream traffic. The internet is currently setup to dump UDP traffic if it exceeds a bandwidth threashold in favor of TCP connections. Stuttering during REALLY BIGGG Furballs......Has anyone heard if a modified UDP protocol is on the horizon or if the internet infrastructure providors will be upgrading to routers that segregate UDP and TCP traffic to improve UDP performance for streaming media and internet gaming?

Your installed game is doing all of the crunching while waiting for pointer updates. HTC servers for the most part are ideling per design.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Changeup

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5688
      • Das Muppets
Re: Base Capture Tweak from ChangeUp
« Reply #46 on: November 30, 2010, 04:18:02 PM »
Not a bad idea. I think YA'LL gettin carried away with it though.

Troops as it is have a singular mission get to the map room. If you change that mission then troops that should be running for the map room might go somewhere you didnt want them to. And this is beside all of the additional cpu usage required to complicate the "singular mission."

I think to make this feasible and in the realm of Hitechs consideration it would have to be simple. Troops would do exactly as they've always done and run straight for the map room. When they pass by an object within 20 yards that object is destroyed, no re-animation required. The amount of damage would have a fixed value just as suggested already.

If you wanted a mass assault on the base with troops, you would have to drop them at multiple locations around the town so that they are passing through as many parts of the town as possible on the way to the map room. But they will unlikely pass every object in town leaving some work to be done by players.

But if what I saw earlier in this post is correct and HT is considering a FPS, this is all in vein because you will soon need to grab your M1 Garand to take a base.
I understand what you are saying but it isn't necessary.  Right now you can't take a town without everything being down anyway so if you dropped the "new" troops early, they would just go to what object isn't down.  Either way, you would have to drop more troops.  Again, a massive air drop would be in harms way with Ack, fighters over town, GVs roaming to town (a tank firing HE rounds into town would kill a ton of troops with a 500ft blast diameter).  Again, if you limit the number of troops that are deployable at each base, D-Day style assaults are not possible and it would add a little fun and another option.
"Such is the nature of war.  By protecting others, you save yourself."

"Those who are skilled in combat do not become angered.  Those who are skilled at winning do not become afraid.  Thus, the wise win before the fight, while the ignorant fight to win." - Morihei Ueshiba