Author Topic: Dambusters!  (Read 4140 times)

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #30 on: December 11, 2010, 09:50:17 AM »
on a serious note tho, ive allways wondered this...the dam buster bomb is absolutly devestating...travels faster than i torpedo (i think, sorry if im wrong) and 1 does pretty much KO style damage...why not use it as an alternitive to torpedos?

i mean imagine this: squadren attack a cv group. bluff bombers attract the fire of the cv ack while the real bombers carrying the "dam busters" come in on the other side, 3 bombers realise dam busters at the cv. if just one of them hits, wouldnt it pretty much nock out the cv? this is just me brainstorming. but i think it would be an amazing idea to modify them to be kind of like "bouncing" torpedos.

The problem is the "Dambuster" Bomb doesn't explode on contact IIRC. It was designed to skip along the water and then be stopped by the dam at which point it sunk and exploded at a certain depth. Although a large enough explosion could break the back of a ship, I highly doubt a damnbuster would do it. Insteand the bombs would skip along the water, hit the CV, and then sink. By the time they sank enough to explode the CV would've moved away.

Secondly torpedo bombers are meat for the 5" guns of a CV fleet so what makes you think a Skip Bomber would do any better?
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #31 on: December 11, 2010, 09:55:59 AM »
The problem is the "Dambuster" Bomb doesn't explode on contact IIRC. It was designed to skip along the water and then be stopped by the dam at which point it sunk and exploded at a certain depth. Although a large enough explosion could break the back of a ship, I highly doubt a damnbuster would do it. Insteand the bombs would skip along the water, hit the CV, and then sink. By the time they sank enough to explode the CV would've moved away.

Secondly torpedo bombers are meat for the 5" guns of a CV fleet so what makes you think a Skip Bomber would do any better?

couldnt it be made tho to detonate on contact, like a torpedo?

and from all the vids ive seen of the dambuster. it seems like it bounces along the water faster than a torpedo travels.


it could be succesful in a way that since it travels faster than a torpedo, it would have a higher chance of hitting the cv than a torpedo.


you have to get right in the cvs face in the front b4 realising the torpedo in order to garruentee a hit, and thats pretty much what makes them cannon fodder.

but with the dam buster, couldnt you realise is a further ways back and the momentum of the drop would bounce it along to target?.


p.s: i know none of this happen in ww2, im just brainstorming an idea.

Offline spitfreak01

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 113
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #32 on: December 12, 2010, 06:39:17 AM »
i know.... we actually don't have dams... but you can either destroy CV's with dambusters :D
 :salute

My favourite Planes: Spitfire MK XIV, BF109, B24, B17
I play also:
Black ops
MW2
IL2 Sturmovik Birds of Prey

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #33 on: December 12, 2010, 11:40:22 AM »
The problem is the "Dambuster" Bomb doesn't explode on contact IIRC. It was designed to skip along the water and then be stopped by the dam at which point it sunk and exploded at a certain depth. Although a large enough explosion could break the back of a ship, I highly doubt a damnbuster would do it. Insteand the bombs would skip along the water, hit the CV, and then sink. By the time they sank enough to explode the CV would've moved away.

Secondly torpedo bombers are meat for the 5" guns of a CV fleet so what makes you think a Skip Bomber would do any better?

9 hours later........
i know.... we actually don't have dams... but you can either destroy CV's with dambusters :D
 :salute



See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline sky25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 530
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #34 on: December 12, 2010, 12:18:00 PM »
Welcome to the forums, let me tell you about the Search button, it's up in the upper right hand corner. Please use it.  You will see how many other people have asked for this, you might even find where HTC said it wasn't going to happen.

I didn't realize that because something was mentioned in the past, that it could not be brought up again. Thank you for the condescending way in which you police the boards.. Dont worry, you can let a new guy into the forum. I am sure it will be years before he surpasses you tally of thousands of posts.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2010, 12:20:01 PM by sky25 »


sky25  "Vsky" In The Game

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #35 on: December 12, 2010, 12:22:15 PM »
 :lol

I didn't realize that because something was mentioned in the past, that it could not be brought up again. Thank you for the condescending way in which you police the boards.. Dont worry, you can let a new guy into the forum. I am sure it will be years before he surpasses you tally of thousands of posts.
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #36 on: December 12, 2010, 12:22:34 PM »
I didn't realize that because something was mentioned in the past, that it could not be brought up again. Thank you for the condescending way in which you police the boards.. Dont worry, you can let a new guy into the forum. I am sure it will be years before he surpasses you tally of thousands of posts.

No, Thank YOU for the condescending ways you police the boards.  I gave him some advice, next time I'll be sure to just post a fail picture just to tick you off.  :aok
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline hyster

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 227
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #37 on: December 12, 2010, 12:40:07 PM »
the "bouncing bomb" was more like a depth charge than a bomb.

google "high ball" and barnes wallis.

he made a smaller "bomb" for use against ships but as far as i no it was never used in action.
the germans made there own version that was rocket assisted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1JBYIClEd0 30 secs in for the rocket bomb.

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #38 on: December 12, 2010, 03:12:48 PM »
seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack

Offline GreenEagle43

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 310
      • http://www.dickweedhbg.com
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #39 on: December 12, 2010, 03:24:47 PM »
Dam you busters. them loco busters. dambusters.  :x :x just a joke. he he he ha ha ha
Recruiting Officer GrnEagle  DHBG
Dedicated to Bish Country. 16 YEARS of BOMBER SERVICE

AN Aces High BOMBER SQUADRON. www.dickweedhbg.com

Offline sky25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 530
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #40 on: December 12, 2010, 04:35:32 PM »
No, Thank YOU for the condescending ways you police the boards.  I gave him some advice, next time I'll be sure to just post a fail picture just to tick you off.  :aok

Oh No! Not the dreaded fail picture!!! Please Jayhawk dont use the fail picture..


sky25  "Vsky" In The Game

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #41 on: December 12, 2010, 04:36:30 PM »
Oh No! Not the dreaded fail picture!!! Please Jayhawk dont use the fail picture..

I just find it ironic that about half of your posts are criticizing other people's post as not being productive posts.  :rolleyes:
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #42 on: December 12, 2010, 04:42:33 PM »
Krusty's twin brother maybe?

I just find it ironic that about half of your posts are criticizing other people's post as not being productive posts.  :rolleyes:
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline halo342

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 245
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #43 on: December 12, 2010, 06:04:37 PM »
Oh my God, what has the Internet evolved itself into? :huh

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Dambusters!
« Reply #44 on: December 12, 2010, 07:14:51 PM »