Author Topic: A Tank Killer  (Read 1282 times)

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #30 on: February 14, 2011, 12:38:11 AM »
Last guy you want to mess around with

opinion=/=fact.
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #31 on: February 14, 2011, 12:44:01 AM »
opinion=/=fact.
masherbrum knows alot more than you on this stuff bud. on both the M10 and M18 he is correct although his beaufighter opinion deserves a little fixing into a
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #32 on: February 14, 2011, 12:45:20 AM »
masherbrum knows alot more than you on this stuff bud. on both the M10 and M18 he is correct although his beaufighter opinion deserves a little fixing into a
(Image removed from quote.)
oh no i wasent refering to that at all.

i ment about his beu being added before the b29 statement.

i guess i should of just quoted that part  :o

Offline haggerty

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 879
      • Facebook
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #33 on: February 15, 2011, 01:19:27 PM »
I would rather have the M36 instead of the M18...I never see the 36 mentioned here or in World of Tanks.
The 36 actually had some armor, and also the 90mm instead of the 76mm.
Unfortunately both would be eaten alive in MA due to the open turret...gun would be popped just as easy as the wirb, but wouldnt be able to fire back.
-Ninja250, -Spectre, -UBerHAGS, -FieroGT, -Haggerty, -Hellcat -Misawa, -Gloom -Nobunaga -Cobrakai

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #34 on: February 15, 2011, 02:06:57 PM »
I would rather have the M36 instead of the M18...I never see the 36 mentioned here or in World of Tanks.
The 36 actually had some armor, and also the 90mm instead of the 76mm.
Unfortunately both would be eaten alive in MA due to the open turret...gun would be popped just as easy as the wirb, but wouldnt be able to fire back.

+1

And I've wondered the same thing. I've even read, somewhere, some disparaging remarks about the M-18 from crews who were formerly in M-10s.

M-10-->3" former AAA gun.
M-18-->76mm, same as in the M-4(76) in game now.
M-36-->90mm, same as the Pershing.

Bigger is better.  :devil


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline NormH3

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
      • We do good things!
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #35 on: February 15, 2011, 02:22:20 PM »
panzerjäger tiger

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6166
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #36 on: February 15, 2011, 04:49:10 PM »
I still say the Su100 or M18.  Both would add something currently absent from the game in terms of gv's.  Along with a whole host of M3 and SdKfz 251 variants. 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2011, 12:55:15 AM »
+1

And I've wondered the same thing. I've even read, somewhere, some disparaging remarks about the M-18 from crews who were formerly in M-10s.

M-10-->3" former AAA gun.
M-18-->76mm, same as in the M-4(76) in game now.
M-36-->90mm, same as the Pershing.

Bigger is better.  :devil


wrongway
M-18 wont have realism problems in here. By the way... how big is 3" compared to 76mm anyways? ;)
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10400
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #38 on: February 16, 2011, 05:11:17 PM »
M-18 wont have realism problems in here. By the way... how big is 3" compared to 76mm anyways? ;)


  There is 2.54 cm in an inch or 25.4 mm so the 76mm is .2 of a mm smaller than 3 inches.


    :salute

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: A Tank Killer
« Reply #39 on: February 16, 2011, 06:28:11 PM »

  There is 2.54 cm in an inch or 25.4 mm so the 76mm is .2 of a mm smaller than 3 inches.


    :salute
yes i get this but if you noticed he lists bigger is better and 3 inches is bigger than 76mm :aok
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy