Author Topic: Another B-29 wish....  (Read 2170 times)

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2011, 12:45:24 PM »
Remove the 20mm.... I thought it was pretty well established and shown these were removed?

Give it a break, we don't even have the B-29 yet. Who knows maybe we'll have a gun package with & without it.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6656
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2011, 01:02:21 PM »
Given the choice, most people would choose the option with the 20mm...
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2011, 01:13:13 PM »
It was established that many, probably most, were removed, not all.  We have plenty of armament options in AH that were in the minority.

Not so much, we don't... Outside of a few exceptions I think most of the planeset is fairly representative.

There's an effort lately to revisit these armament options as planes are updated with newer 3D models. See the SpitVc reduced to SpitVb. See the 109F4 removed of gondolas. See the early 1943 109G6 with no 30mm option.

The emphasis is moving towards more representative loadouts. It's a clear trend in HTC's decisions over the past several years. I hope they stick with it.

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6499
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2011, 01:15:22 PM »
They kept the rarer three cannon option when they remodeled the La7.  :noid
Snuggie - voted "Sexiest Man Alive" for the entire Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere!

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2011, 01:31:45 PM »
They kept the rarer three cannon option when they remodeled the La7.  :noid

True... one of the few exceptions that come to mind.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2011, 02:01:40 PM »
Not so much, we don't... Outside of a few exceptions I think most of the planeset is fairly representative.

There's an effort lately to revisit these armament options as planes are updated with newer 3D models. See the SpitVc reduced to SpitVb. See the 109F4 removed of gondolas. See the early 1943 109G6 with no 30mm option.

The emphasis is moving towards more representative loadouts. It's a clear trend in HTC's decisions over the past several years. I hope they stick with it.
]
Sorry, you're wrong.  The Spit Vc to Vb had nothing to do with the Vc being rare, as it was the most common version of Spit V, it had to do with getting an earlier Spit V.  Same goes for the Bf109G-6 losing its 30mm, nothing to do with how common it was on G-6s and everything to do with none being on early 1943 G-6s.

The La-7, probably the most obvious example, retained its three B-20 cannon armament when it was updated, despite being updated well after the Spits and 109s.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #21 on: February 16, 2011, 03:54:47 PM »
Noooooo not my 20mm cannon, don't take mah bucket.....err I mean my 20mm cannon!
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline VonKost

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 232
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #22 on: February 16, 2011, 04:11:52 PM »
The 20mm is cool and was common enough in the field! at least in the earlier A models. we should keep it!!  :old:

(edited to clarify)
« Last Edit: February 16, 2011, 04:26:36 PM by VonKost »

Offline Dr_Death8

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 574
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #23 on: February 16, 2011, 04:17:55 PM »
Well, technically if most were removed in the field, then it is a field mod which does not exist in AH.  :salute

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #24 on: February 16, 2011, 04:47:28 PM »
Well, technically if most were removed in the field, then it is a field mod which does not exist in AH.  :salute

The removals weren't field modifications in the sense of field mods like adding a 20mm cannons to a PBY but rather an ordered thing from high command.  Since there were a limited number of B-29Bs produced, a few B-29A underwent conversion (though still retained the A model designation) and had the armor and guns removed similiar to the B model.

I believe the B-29As that were not stipped down retained the 20mm cannons while the stripped down A's initially went with the 2x .50 calibers and 20mm cannon and then later removed the 20mm cannon in favor of the 3x .50 caliber tail gun package similiar to the B.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #25 on: February 16, 2011, 05:29:46 PM »
hey didnt the A model have a radar underneth it between the bombbay doors or was that only used on the model that flew during the korean war?
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12391
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #26 on: February 16, 2011, 05:42:51 PM »
The removals weren't field modifications in the sense of field mods like adding a 20mm cannons to a PBY but rather an ordered thing from high command.  Since there were a limited number of B-29Bs produced, a few B-29A underwent conversion (though still retained the A model designation) and had the armor and guns removed similiar to the B model.

I believe the B-29As that were not stipped down retained the 20mm cannons while the stripped down A's initially went with the 2x .50 calibers and 20mm cannon and then later removed the 20mm cannon in favor of the 3x .50 caliber tail gun package similiar to the B.

ack-ack

AA,

I'm sure it's been posted before but I'm not in the mood to drag through 100 B29 threads so.. why did they take them out?
JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2011, 05:49:10 PM »
AA,

I'm sure it's been posted before but I'm not in the mood to drag through 100 B29 threads so.. why did they take them out?

I believe the USAAF after some studies learned that 3x .50 calibers were just as effective with the radar guidance system than 2x .50s and single 20mm cannon.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline 5PointOh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #28 on: February 16, 2011, 05:54:26 PM »
Well, technically if most were removed in the field, then it is a field mod which does not exist in AH.  :salute
But field mods do exsist in AH...check out the 51B.
Coprhead
Wings of Terror
Mossie Student Driver

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: Another B-29 wish....
« Reply #29 on: February 16, 2011, 05:57:40 PM »
When you get down to it, 3x50s would be more deadly IMO than the 2x50s plus the 20mm. The 20mm is going to have different ballistics than the fifty's so it'll throw off your aim a bit. Don't get me wrong though, when the 20mm's hit you they're still going to hurt like hell.
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF