Author Topic: HT i think you should consider more priceing options  (Read 3113 times)

Grater

  • Guest
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2000, 03:10:00 PM »
Come on Yeager, the idea of these messages boards is so that we can voice our opinions!  Nobody is saying that what we are getting is not worth every penny and more.  We are all just trying to put ideas across...you know, two heads better than one?  The guru's who made this game, have made it even better with the contribution of those who play it.  Without us, they really don't have a market and so I am sure that they read and understand what the situation is.  They are not idiots.  So I think you are being a tad unfair.  Whatever pricing scheme they select will benefit all of us.  BUT YOU CAN'T PLEASE ALL!!!

ZeroControl

  • Guest
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2000, 03:11:00 PM »
I think it all sucks!!! I started playing this game for 2 days ago and i love it, but i will never be able to play it anymore. Stupid!!
Why the price for plying? never heard about it before. Make a price on the game instead so other people can play it to.

ZeroControl

  • Guest
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2000, 03:16:00 PM »
I forgott to say im already paying about $180/month just to have Internet(ISDN), thats what it costs here in Sweden. Thats for about 150h/month of surfing, we pay by the hour here.
Its stupid i know but what to do

Sorrow[S=A]

  • Guest
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #18 on: January 24, 2000, 06:13:00 PM »
Zero, there will be an 8 person server free, 30 a month is just for main servers. Hence I suspect you will see several permanent free 8 person servers appear quickly after release.

------------------
If your in range, so is the enemy.

Hotdog

  • Guest
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2000, 09:13:00 PM »
Hey guys settle down all im trying to do is see if there is support for other priceing options so others can play this game like I said before I certainly think US $30 is well worth it for unlimited play on AH but in todays world selling something to the consumer is all about giveing consumers a  choice of options for you products and really all AH is a product HT/Pyro is selling to us the flight sim junki.

For example if you were to go in to a computer shop and look for a new computer, you say to the sales rep that you are intrested in a brand new P2 400 with 64meg Ram , sales rep takes you over to the computers and thay all look the same too you, so you ask the sales rep to show you the computers on display, sales rep replies "Oh sir there all P3 600 made by xxxx company, they all have 128 megs ram , 6.4gig HD, 19" Moniter and 4 meg 3D/2D
video card, we dont stock anything else sir
its all we have" So you say to the sales rep look I really like your company and the product you have I hear your support is the best and i really want to buy from you, but I really want a P2 400 as its not so expensive, I dont want a P3 600. Once again the sales rep say sorry sir I cant offer you that option we dont do other options only this one and nothing else.

Now tell me what you would do, Im sure you would go somewhere else that there is a choice, and in today world its all about choice, as for billing I can see that it may add some extra stuff HT/Pyro has to do to there systems so it could work but really they are running a buisness and today buisness have to be able to adapt to the needs of the customers they want to bring to
help fund there buisness..



------------------
Hotdog
CO RNZAF Warbirds/Aces High

Offline Flacke

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #20 on: January 24, 2000, 09:53:00 PM »
HEY JEDI !  you could not have said it better, and you used so few words to make a lot of VERY VALID points. I think that there are  many sim-pilots out  there who feel exactly as you do. I want AH to do well over the long haul, but they have to continue to earn our respect and our dollars, or someone else will.

Offline Beegerite

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 209
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2000, 10:49:00 PM »
Very interesting thread.  Amazingly I don't see the operative word in business mentioned in any of the posts; competition!  I've been flying AH for about 3 days and like it a lot but I've got a real hangup about shelling out $30.00 to play it.  Why? Cause for the last year I've been playing Fighter Ace about 3 hours per day minimum for $9.95/month  Though I like many of the AH features somehow I think that all I have to do is hang in a little and FA2 will be everything that I expected.  On the other hand as it stands today based on what I've seen if AH was $9.95/month there would be no question in my mind where I would be hanging my hat.  Creative people aren't necessarily good at business, remember Gary Killdall sent IBM away when they came to offer him the contract for an operating system.  To get me to switch at the quoted price I would need a flight sim that was everything I've got in FA2 PLUS perfectly modeled planes, country scenarios which are a little closer to reality and included "special events" as we have (yeah, I know they're not too good). Please let's not get into MS bashing, I don't particularly like them either.  Anyway back to competition, what do the "financial guru's" say?  Will the market support a flight sim at $30.00/month competing vs. one that charges $9.95 and is backed by "deep pockets"? Maybe, just maybe, somebody wants to keep a low profile and go for a niche market vs. going up against Goliath?
Time will tell
Beeg

Offline Maniac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3817
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2000, 09:14:00 AM »
Yea and ICI sold to IEN. . .

As long as WB has it price at 2$ an hour it surely will work, but if IEN lowers the WB price to an flat rate similar (spelling?) to AH´s things are gonna go downwards. . .

// -nr-1-

Warbirds handle : nr-1 //// -nr-1- //// Maniac

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2000, 10:00:00 AM »
"Maybe, just maybe, somebody wants to keep a low profile and go for a niche market vs. going up against Goliath?"

 Goliath?  More like Borg. Microsoft assimilates. I think calling them Goliath is too much of a compliment.

 With those deep pockets don't you think that MS or VR-1 should have been able to come out with a knock out product and not the hack of a job that they did? That's my honest opinion of FA 2. Not a flame.

 -Westy

[This message has been edited by Westy (edited 01-25-2000).]

skeet

  • Guest
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #24 on: January 25, 2000, 02:54:00 PM »
They're not going to fail because I sat watching from the fence. They've got the guts to put themselves on the line - they're getting my support.


HiTech et al - check your fax, not your 6 ;-)



------------------
skeet - out
Aces High - Fight Stimulator

justamutt

  • Guest
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #25 on: January 25, 2000, 03:39:00 PM »
$30.00 is kind of steep for the initial investment on a limited flight sim.
Average Cost:
ISP= 19.95 monthly
Aces 30.00 Monthly
anything else ? (toll charges etc.)
Starting to get into the luxry seats.

I could see a gradual step up to that amount over time once more planes and terrains etc have beeen included  but for the initial cost? seems kind of steep.  
   I understand cost and overhead but urge Hi tech inc. not to get into the mind frame of "you pay for quality" and "we only care about the serious flight sim jock"  because Aces is not to that point yet nor will HT inc. be able to support a flight sim that caters to the (only) serious flight simmer.. I'm sure in the near future it could be but for the average consumer it will be just another expensive game over the internet that costs too much.
   This is only my 2cents but I hope your listening.  I also hope this game isn't dubbed Warbirds II...  which it could easily be if the right people aren't careful with pricing and how they are preceived by the public.

------------------
So ya Want to Be A Pilot!
 Justa Mutt

Offline Downtown

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
      • http://www.tir.com/~lkbrown1
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #26 on: January 25, 2000, 06:37:00 PM »
The main reason I see for haveing a steeped plan would be to snag some of the low income/casual flyers.

I remeber a while back, someone in College was complaining that $29.95 was too much, and he didn't fly much.

If there was a Tierd plan, HT could snap up some of the folks that really can't afford $29.95.

I want to see what WB 3.0 looks like, but I can't get 2.75 working, and iEN says the problem is on my end?

Funny how Aces High doesn't cause me any probs.

I will probably get an AH Account cause I believe I can afford it.  The WB/iEN will have to go because  I can't play it.

But I think allowing the likes of.

$9.95 for 5 hours.
$19.95 for 10 Hours.
and $29.95 for Unlimited will bring in more money.

I guess we will all just have to wait and see.

------------------
Lincoln "Downtown" Brown.
 lkbrown1@tir.com
 http://www.tir.com/~lkbrown1
Those who don't remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Hals und beinbruch!

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8269
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #27 on: January 25, 2000, 07:40:00 PM »
30 flat or 2 bucks per.


Teirs, smeirs.

Keep it simple,
Wab

or even simpler, 30 bucks flat. ;0)
Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Skorpyon

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 110
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #28 on: January 25, 2000, 11:15:00 PM »
hmmmmm... my 2 cents worth...
How about 20 bucks/mo., plus an additional 10 per for each additional user on same account (per my previously mentioned "son and I wanna fly together" message)?  30 is steep for one pilot, 20 seems a perfect compromise for everyone who has a concern about it, and the extra user fee helps out those parents like me who have a family of AH junkies. One son is hooked, and the other has been beggin for me to set him up a user name.  This initial rate would make AH more easily accessible to more flyers, yet avoid the mess of tier plans, hourly rates, and other hocus-pocus rate plans.  Just a random thought, floating around in those beautifully rendered AH clouds.    

[This message has been edited by Skorpyon (edited 01-25-2000).]

[This message has been edited by Skorpyon (edited 01-25-2000).]

Offline blitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
HT i think you should consider more priceing options
« Reply #29 on: January 26, 2000, 05:10:00 AM »
hi all,

for me AH is just pure fun although it's still not finished.
Some people spent their money on expencive cars, some on disco nights, others need a new TV every year.
To me it seems that 30 bucks/month has a very good fun/dollar ratio.

Only complain i have is that these 30bucks should include special evends - otherwise i want my drinks for free ;-)

I'll give it a try.

blitz