Well, HiTech/Skuzzy, there you go. I sought, early in this thread, to get the factual question of what constitutes cheating resolved. You have now clarified the issue with regard to CV betrayal. Your position on this surprised several people who WEREN'T aware that such a thing would be defined as a cheat, since it was not proscribed by any written or coded set of rules. Now they're asking if there are further rules of which we are currently unaware.
This whole thing screams for a code of conduct, unfortunately, because what's obvious to you is apparently not obvious to everyone else. In fact, I'd solicit the user base for those rules, since editing is always easier than composing and they, as users, have doubtless encountered every "code" situation possible. Perhaps you could have a subtopic here for submissions..? This would have the added advantage of giving the user base some ownership over the code - yet would retain your dicretionary oversight. That way they own it but it isn't some ridicuolously democratic form (note the little d - I'm not violating the rule on politics, thus) of institutionalized mob rule. Ask the ancient Greeks how that one worked out, as an aside.
