Author Topic: new boat ----> LCT(R)  (Read 5777 times)

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #75 on: August 16, 2011, 05:47:33 PM »
Wiki isn't a reliable source.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline stabbyy

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 158
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #76 on: August 16, 2011, 08:18:55 PM »
Wiki isn't a reliable source.

no but it shows the make up of an AP shell fact is without explosives in the shell all you have is a giant bullet...

a bullet is offten solid metal.. a shell is just that a shell with explosives inside of it..


An armour piercing shell is a type of ammunition designed to penetrate armour. In naval warfare and older anti-tank shells, the shell had to withstand the shock of punching through armour plating. Shells designed for this purpose had a greatly strengthened case with a specially hardened and shaped nose, and a much smaller bursting charge. Some smaller calibre AP shells have an inert filling, or incendiary charge in place of the HE bursting charge. The AP shell is now very rarely seen except in naval usage, and is not commonly used there
« Last Edit: August 16, 2011, 08:27:39 PM by stabbyy »

Offline Skyguns MKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #77 on: August 16, 2011, 10:15:07 PM »
this is becoming irrelevant, can we please continue who's for and not for the lctr?

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #78 on: August 16, 2011, 10:16:53 PM »
+1 if the artty idea gets shot down, I need something to take out SB's quickly. And +1 even if our next addition is the Hummel.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Skyguns MKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #79 on: November 06, 2011, 11:45:24 AM »
+1 if the artty idea gets shot down, I need something to take out SB's quickly. And +1 even if our next addition is the Hummel.

Rockets are your friend  :noid

Offline Shane

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7822
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #80 on: November 07, 2011, 07:28:14 PM »
read it again...
if they have 6000 total, launching 1000 at a time...how many actual launches are there?

6,000 assuming no duds.    :noid :aok :bolt:
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline Fish42

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 862
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #81 on: November 07, 2011, 08:10:18 PM »
Just found a video of them firing these beasts...  :O

http://ww.vbox7.com/play:2c750483


Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #82 on: November 08, 2011, 06:14:46 PM »
LCT(R)? No thanks, much more suitable things out there we can get.
JG 52

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #83 on: November 08, 2011, 07:18:23 PM »
WOW does that vbox load slow!
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline Fish42

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 862
Re: new boat ----> LCT(R)
« Reply #84 on: November 08, 2011, 09:17:30 PM »
lol, yeah it really does.