I can't judge which is better (I don't think I've even flown a P47N yet), but it would be interesting to see performance charts for both, using the same exact fuel weight. Can you leave off the drop tank pylons in AH? I doubt a single P47N ever flew without them, given their super-long-range missions, but in AH, with same weight of fuel, it would be interesting to see which one performs better. My understanding is they both had the same R-2800 engine and GE CH-5 turbosupercharger. The test bed for both the YP-47M and XP-47N was the SAME P47C (according to Bodie). Some later P47Ns, apparently got a slightly newer R-2800-73 (still combat AC, non-combat P47Ns after that apparently got -77 and -81 engines). I don't know if that makes a difference, nor do I know which engine AH models.
unrelated, probably totally meaningless piece of data: Checking the late war stats for the current tour, the P47M and N K/D ratios are quite different. Any theories as to why?
P47D11: 1.32
D25: 1.17
D40: 0.73 (!!!?)
P47M: 1.40
P47N: 0.70 (!!?)
some other AC:
P51D: 1.26
P38J: 1.60
P38L: 0.62
me262: 7.26 (hehe)
yak-9U: 0.98
F4U-4: 3.03 (perk points making folks more timid perhaps?)
F4u-1D: 0.76
F4U-1C: 2.89
C-47: 0.04 (ok, huh? auger nearby perhaps?)
A-20G: 1.53
B24: 0.33
B29: 0.98
ME109G6:1.13
Chute: 642.00 huh? I get that you can't really get killed in a chute, but 642 kills by people in chutes???