Author Topic: 109 on CV's  (Read 1146 times)

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4486
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #15 on: April 19, 2011, 12:10:01 PM »
Sorry Shemp, eve tho i would LOVE to fly a sea 109, i give it a -1.
The Graf Zeppelin was almost completed in '41 then they took a break in the construction. When they could finally complete it, it could leave the harbour couse of the red navy. It was captured and sunk by the russians.
The 109T was an emil modifyed for carryer operations (they thought the G.Z. will be operational in '41, and modifyed the current 109). I dont have much info about it, but it seen combat.
AoM
City of ice

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #16 on: April 19, 2011, 12:25:24 PM »
The 109T was most similar to a 109E-7 in actual performance. The only real difference would be the longer wingtips. This would make it roll worse and be more susceptible to G-forces ripping wings off (example: Ta152 in-game), but it would have a better turn radius (maybe) and better lift at higher alts (maybe).

Overall a non-entity for the Luftwaffe's planeset. We would be much better off with an E-7 or an E-7Z or an E-7N.


Just.... not on a cv.

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #17 on: April 19, 2011, 02:11:37 PM »
However, if I recall correctly, the 109-T scored the 1st B-17 kill of the war.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2011, 06:13:34 AM »
The 109T was most similar to a 109E-7 in actual performance. The only real difference would be the longer wingtips. This would make it roll worse and be more susceptible to G-forces ripping wings off (example: Ta152 in-game), but it would have a better turn radius (maybe) and better lift at higher alts (maybe).

Overall a non-entity for the Luftwaffe's planeset. We would be much better off with an E-7 or an E-7Z or an E-7N.


Just.... not on a cv.
How could anything roll worse than a 109E? It so , it wouldnt roll at all!  Why is the 109E such a god-awful roller anyway?  Anybody know?    :headscratch:
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline lulu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1068
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #19 on: April 20, 2011, 07:24:27 AM »
-10^11



 :salute
mobilis in mobile

Offline jimson

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7202
      • The Axis vs Allies Arena
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2011, 11:09:16 AM »
In the AvA we do sometimes run "what if?" scenarios. For the past week, it was what if Germany had finished and deployed a carrier.

We have to fudge such a set up and we don't have tailhooks.

As for the wish, I'm neutral.

Offline fuzeman

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8908
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2011, 11:26:13 AM »
Hes saying the 109's flip and stall quirks.  I don't think there is much substance to that either but more so than a spit perhaps.

He is?   :confused:

<snip>(except the seafire has almost none of its bad flip over & spin stall quirks modeled),<snip>
Far too many, if not most, people on this Board post just to say something opposed to posting when they have something to say.

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline 1Nicolas

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 176
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2011, 01:15:45 PM »
Germans Had no carriers.They had plans to build a Zepplin Aircraft carrier but that got toasted! :D

(My World Of Tank signature)
There are no great men, just great challenges which ordinary men, out of necessity, are forced by circumstances to meet.

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2011, 02:03:31 PM »
I meant taking a cargo ship and converting it into an aircraft carrier. You would have to remove all the cargo and build a flight deck on it.
Unfortunately I could not find a good picture.

Ah ha.

You're slightly confused.

The Cassiblanca class CVE built on converted Liberty Ship hulls. They were also known as Kaiser Carriers for their builder, Kaiser Steel of Vancouver, Washington.



Kaiser = U.S. Ship building company. Kaiser ≠ Emperor of Germany.

 :D


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2011, 05:48:48 PM »
Ah ha.

You're slightly confused.

The Cassiblanca class CVE built on converted Liberty Ship hulls. They were also known as Kaiser Carriers for their builder, Kaiser Steel of Vancouver, Washington.

(Image removed from quote.)

Kaiser = U.S. Ship building company. Kaiser ≠ Emperor of Germany.

 :D


wrongway

I don't think that I'm confusing it with the Kaiser class, because this is the first time I hear of that class of ships.

There is a high possibility that I'm just wrong  :(   (perhaps my source was incorrect)
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4486
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2011, 06:10:57 PM »
Germans Had no carriers.They had plans to build a Zepplin Aircraft carrier but that got toasted! :D
hee hee heeeeee, funny isnt it? Sayin once more, what was said a couple times before...
You have a place in my hearth.
AoM
City of ice

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2011, 08:47:58 PM »
You have a place in my hearth.

You gonna cook him in your fireplace and eat him?

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #27 on: April 22, 2011, 10:09:34 AM »
You gonna cook him in your fireplace and eat him?

ack-ack

Roasted rabbit...



Not too bad. There's worse things you could eat.

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Ardy123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #28 on: April 22, 2011, 01:53:13 PM »
Roasted rabbit...

(Image removed from quote.)

Not too bad. There's worse things you could eat.


Wha??? Pictures of dead bunnies? :furious :furious :furious  :D
Yeah, that's right, you just got your rear handed to you by a fuggly puppet!
==Army of Muppets==
(Bunnies)

Offline fuzeman

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8908
Re: 109 on CV's
« Reply #29 on: April 22, 2011, 05:24:39 PM »
That rabbits not pining for the fjords, or dead!!! It's resting.
Far too many, if not most, people on this Board post just to say something opposed to posting when they have something to say.

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54