Author Topic: General Avionics Questions  (Read 1623 times)

Offline ozrocker

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3640
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #15 on: May 04, 2011, 08:56:11 AM »
Pappy when I first saw that illustration I said to myself "WTF does the Hindenberg have to
do with prop pitch/speed/rpm on fighters,lol.
Realized it was prop blade :rofl


                                                                                <S> Oz
Flying and dying since Tour 29
The world is grown so bad. That wrens make prey where eagles dare not perch.- Shakespeare
 
30% Disabled Vet  US ARMY- 11C2H 2/32 AR. 3rd AD, 3/67AR. 2nd AD, 2/64 AR. 3rd ID, ABGD Command TRADOC, 1/16th INF. 1st ID

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12398
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #16 on: May 04, 2011, 12:09:56 PM »


variable pitch prop as some of the WW2 A/C would have had..


Can you name any WW2 plane that had a variable pitch prop ? I have never heard of one.

HiTech

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2011, 12:45:27 PM »
.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Ron

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 159
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #18 on: May 04, 2011, 01:10:42 PM »

I sat on the flight deck of a Sunderland once that had them.

They were adjusted by momentarily toggling switches that operated an electrical motor/actuator. (I think it was actually on the prop hub - not sure)
I guess it was mainly the domain of the Flight Engineer.

Fairey Battle rings a bell as well. I seem to remember some were only full fine, and full coarse.

I'm not sure of any others though. I'll bow to your more studied knowledge of the period.
I guess they would have only been on very early WW2 fighters due to the handling effort required., possibly the prototype spit with it's 2 blade prop..?

 :)
God Save the Queen..!

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2011, 01:32:37 PM »
A number of the lesser versions of P-40s (K or L or whatever) had electric management of the prop pitch. You pushed a switch one way or another to get finer or coarser pitch. They may have had auto pitch modes, but being electrically controlled (rather than the oil controlled type) they were unreliable.

I have also read in a couple of places that the Bf109E series had automatic pitch control, but that this did not work very well and in most cases was broken, meaning pilots did it manually.

Just as an FYI.

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #20 on: May 04, 2011, 05:56:03 PM »
Those electrically controlled props were probably constant speed, but the governor is controlled by an electric servo/motor.   The B-24 is set up in that fashion...good old Hamilton Standard constant speed propellors with electrically controlled governor.  There are 4 toggle switches used to adjust prop RPM.  Those prop controls are the most problematic thing on the entire airplane.  More than once we had to shutdown an engine so the flight engineer could walk out on the wing, lean over the cowling and give the prop control a sharp whack with a hammer to "unstick" it.  Another time we couldn't reduce RPM after takeoff so the co-pilot kept pushing/pulling the feather button to control prop RPM as I went around to land.  Electric prop controls are slow also....that was an issue on the P-38 IIRC -- very slow to feather.
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"

Offline Ron

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 159
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #21 on: May 04, 2011, 07:29:48 PM »
They were definitely manual only.
However, It was a Sandringham (Ex Sunderland) , so it  could have had the automatics removed if they were too unreliable for a later CofA.

Pretty sure I remember the battle being variable pitch though. My Mum used to work at Faireys during the war, and I had a set of pilots notes. Still have somewhere..!
« Last Edit: May 04, 2011, 07:37:59 PM by Ron »
God Save the Queen..!

Offline jamdive

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 304
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #22 on: May 07, 2011, 10:59:19 AM »
Can you name any WW2 plane that had a variable pitch prop ? I have never heard of one.

HiTech

Maybe they are talking about constant speed props?

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #23 on: May 07, 2011, 11:24:08 AM »
Can you name any WW2 plane that had a variable pitch prop ? I have never heard of one.

For example some Spitfire Mk.Is had them as well as Bf109Ds which were used in the Poland campaign.
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5937
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #24 on: May 12, 2011, 11:54:37 AM »
I have read that some of the earliest examples of the Spitfire Mk. I were equipped with a three-bladed De Haviland prop that had only two positions: climb and cruise.  The following is from the recently-cited http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit1vrs109e.html:

"...
No. 54 Squadron completely converted to "Rotol Spitfires" during December 1939. 10 The introduction of the constant speed propellers increased the Spitfire's climb rate by 730 ft/min. over that of the 2-pitch propeller equipped Spitfires
..."
« Last Edit: May 12, 2011, 12:01:56 PM by Bino »


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #25 on: May 13, 2011, 05:35:41 PM »
Did/Do jet engine fan blades have the problem of the tips going supersonic during normal operation? Do they follow the same rules of interaction with air that propellers do?
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline dtango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #26 on: May 14, 2011, 09:19:24 PM »
Did/Do jet engine fan blades have the problem of the tips going supersonic during normal operation?
Yes.

Of course the curious among us will think about that for a bit and then eventually ask the question "How the heck do turbojets work when airplanes fly at supersonic speeds then???" :).  To explain means entering the tricky world of compressible aerodynamics and how engine air inlets are designed for supersonic flow.  Here's an easy to understand article that starts to explain it.

Air & Space Supersonic Inlet Article

Do they follow the same rules of interaction with air that propellers do?
The interactions are quite a deal more complex than what we have with propellers.  Just flipping through a few pages on jet engine axial or centrifugal compressors in my copy of "Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Propulsion" makes my head hurt much worse than trying to understand propeller blade element theory :).
Tango / Tango412 412th FS Braunco Mustangs
"At times it seems like people think they can chuck bunch of anecdotes into some converter which comes up with the flight model." (Wmaker)

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #27 on: May 21, 2011, 05:41:03 AM »
A big  :salute to your Mom, Ron!  My Mother is a Nam vet (a good 5 years before I was born)  :cheers:
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline Ron

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 159
Re: General Avionics Questions
« Reply #28 on: May 23, 2011, 12:44:32 PM »

Thank you Steele,

My Mum, and her sisters were pretty good at dodging bombs in the early forties.
Some of them came under more fire than the lads that went overseas.
Some heroes stay home, and change diapers...!
God Save the Queen..!