Author Topic: Unexplored variants of existing planes?  (Read 2724 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2011, 02:53:18 PM »
Lots of the variants suggested seem to have performance or functionality that overlaps planes that already exist within the game.

I'm hoping for variants that bring something different that what we already have.

Every option you can think of overlaps...

They all fly, fire bullets, and drop bombs, right?

In that respect there is nothing different you can request.

It's the different performance and capabilities that allow the sub-variants listed above fill key holes in the current planeset.

For example: The B-25J would allow a level bomber that could actually defend itself (tail guns, waist guns, formations, and still retain the glass nose). Can the B-26 already do this? Yes. Can the B-17 already do this? Yes. But for B-25 fans, we cannot. The B-25C is a bullet sponge but outside of that it has poor defensive guns.

For example: The Bf109E-7 would fill a major gap in 1941 and 1942 where the Bf109E soldiered on against ever-improving RAF fighters but before the Bf109F arrived on the scene. It would also serve as a major JABO player on the Eastern Front once the LW invades Russia. As it is now we jump from a 1940 Bf109E-4 to a late 1941 Bf109F4 with nothing in between. That's a long time.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2011, 03:14:44 PM »
there was a secound heavy version that had 3 twin lewis guns on the back plus the one up front . I'll grab some pics in a minute

Is this the one you are referring to?



This site has a lot of information on the SAS jeeps.

SAS Jeeps

In any event, I would also like to see the jeep get various options added to the game.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2011, 03:22:45 PM »
Some variants I'd like to see:

...
Ki-84-Ib
La-5
La-5F
Yak-7
Yak-9/9D

or a Ki-84 Ic if we want a fun cheater ac.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #33 on: May 05, 2011, 03:26:21 PM »
hurricane IIa series 1 maybe?

109g6/as and g14/as for sure

ju-87/g1
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #34 on: May 05, 2011, 04:34:39 PM »
P-47D-23...
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6996
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #35 on: May 05, 2011, 09:51:46 PM »
Every option you can think of overlaps...

They all fly, fire bullets, and drop bombs, right?

In that respect there is nothing different you can request.

It's the different performance and capabilities that allow the sub-variants listed above fill key holes in the current planeset.

For example: The B-25J would allow a level bomber that could actually defend itself (tail guns, waist guns, formations, and still retain the glass nose). Can the B-26 already do this? Yes. Can the B-17 already do this? Yes. But for B-25 fans, we cannot. The B-25C is a bullet sponge but outside of that it has poor defensive guns.

For example: The Bf109E-7 would fill a major gap in 1941 and 1942 where the Bf109E soldiered on against ever-improving RAF fighters but before the Bf109F arrived on the scene. It would also serve as a major JABO player on the Eastern Front once the LW invades Russia. As it is now we jump from a 1940 Bf109E-4 to a late 1941 Bf109F4 with nothing in between. That's a long time.

I agree with the b25 and other planes but the spit and 109 recommendations don't really count because there is no current arena where any cut-off date for planeset would create the need for such a 109.

Now I wouldn't mind the early war arena being a bit more early war......which would make that 109 important.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #36 on: May 05, 2011, 10:15:54 PM »
Uh... it has NOTHING to do with arena cutoff dates. Nothing whatsoever.


















Just in case there was any doubt... NOTHING to do with it!

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #37 on: May 05, 2011, 11:24:18 PM »
Ju88G would be nice.
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #38 on: May 05, 2011, 11:56:41 PM »
I agree with the b25 and other planes but the spit and 109 recommendations don't really count because there is no current arena where any cut-off date for planeset would create the need for such a 109.

Now I wouldn't mind the early war arena being a bit more early war......which would make that 109 important.
Bf109 and/or Spitfire/Seafire requests are scenario requests, not EWA/MWA/LWA requests.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #39 on: May 06, 2011, 04:20:12 AM »
Is this the one you are referring to?

(Image removed from quote.)

This site has a lot of information on the SAS jeeps.

SAS Jeeps

In any event, I would also like to see the jeep get various options added to the game.

ack-ack


not quite . It had that twin vickers mount  but there were three that faced backwards and one on the passenger side that faced forwards.   I did also see one that had an anti tank rifle instead of the vickers
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #40 on: May 06, 2011, 07:09:43 AM »

not quite . It had that twin vickers mount  but there were three that faced backwards and one on the passenger side that faced forwards.   I did also see one that had an anti tank rifle instead of the vickers
Would that be the widely reviled Boys .55 ATR?
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6996
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #41 on: May 06, 2011, 10:22:49 AM »
Bf109 and/or Spitfire/Seafire requests are scenario requests, not EWA/MWA/LWA requests.

That makes sense.

What is the planeset limit of total planes in aces high's current engine?

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #42 on: May 06, 2011, 10:48:59 AM »
Would that be the widely reviled Boys .55 ATR?

that would be the gun .
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #43 on: May 06, 2011, 01:00:30 PM »
That makes sense.

What is the planeset limit of total planes in aces high's current engine?

There is no limit.

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Unexplored variants of existing planes?
« Reply #44 on: May 06, 2011, 02:26:22 PM »
There is no limit.

Then I suggest the only qualification should be:

1. existed b/w the Japanese invasion of asia proper and August '45
2. has sufficient flight data to allow HTC to model

Conditioned on those two, I WANT ALL OF 'EM.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.