Again, I'm not saying that it is insignficant, infact, I never even said anything even resembling that. But I DID just that it isn't the most significant thing we could get right now. You guys just seem to be unable to recognize the difference
IMO, what we could get that is MOST significant as far as historical usage goes, would be the Panzer III simply because it was the backbone of the Panzerkorps for almost 2 years, and served extensively on all fronts.
If we didn't have the M4 sherman, then I would be arguing that we need the M4 sherman, since it was the main tank of the US armored forces for the latter half of WWII, and continued to see service into Korea.
Ki-43? Sure, would love to see it added..... eventually.