Author Topic: Sea groups  (Read 294 times)

Offline iron650

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
Sea groups
« on: May 14, 2011, 02:41:17 PM »
There weren't only task forces. Ther could be landing forces, cruiser groups, sub groups, sub hunting groups,and light carrier groups. Wouldn't it be easier to have a landing force with a light carrier, destroyers, and launch vehicles plus have support from another carrier? How about light carriers only fit certain types of planes. Cruiser groups could be cruisers, one battlecruiser, with only one battleship and launch vehicles. Sub groups can be a wolfpack of subs that can launch player-controlled midget-subs. Sub hunting groups perhaps can launch sub-hunting planes (floats), corvettes and can be a group of destroyers. Light carrier groups can be a light carrier protected by destroyers and follow a carrier. But, they all can set their own course. In the end it might be complicated.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2011, 02:46:22 PM by iron650 »

Offline ImADot

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6215
Re: Sea groups
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2011, 03:36:03 PM »
More variety would be nice, but since you can just drive a full CV group to within yards of the coast, having lighter ships is a bit redundant.
My Current Rig:
GigaByte GA-X99-UD4 Mobo w/ 16Gb RAM
Intel i7 5820k, Win7 64-bit
NVidia GTX 970 4Gb ACX 2.0
Track IR, CH Fighterstick, CH Pro Throttle, CH Pro Pedals

Offline james

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
Re: Sea groups
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2011, 03:39:27 PM »
+1 you bad me at midget subs.
6GUN  

4.0GHZ Ryzen9 3900x
32GB DDR4 3200
GTX1070

Offline iron650

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
Re: Sea groups
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2011, 12:40:10 PM »
More variety would be nice, but since you can just drive a full CV group to within yards of the coast, having lighter ships is a bit redundant.


How about only light ships can make it to shore and large ships have to stay farther back.