Penguin.
You are arguing intellectually on an emotional subject.
Now, my rebuttal.
A. Fact's are established points. However they are ALL open to interpretation. History is written by the victor. So all history and as history itself is indicated by fact itself, it is in fact opinion (hahaha screwing with minds across the BBS). Such can be applied to all fact. While we cannot change how something happens or what happened. The effects, both good and bad, are interpreted by witnesses of said fact. Take this into perspective it will be a wonderful event and a terrible event.
B. Emotions drive all decisions, therefore an emotional argument appealing to a target audience will inherently win more of a response than an intellectual argument. CAP's response to me being right about adrenaline, is an indication of my argument. Emotional appeal is how politicians work and as politicans run your respective country all DECISIONS are made as a result of emotional appeal. (invading Iraq for example cost the republicans the election but this is not a political thread so end it HERE).
C. Your initial cause for this whole farce is a man threatening violence. Your condemning him, however he threatened violence as a direct result of an emotional reaction to an accusation or statement from a person seeking confrontation.
D. Taking into account your former posts. You have so far to my knowledge: Attacked veterans of the Vietnam war and the leaders of your nation in such a period. Trivialised many threads to the point of lock. Hijjacked numerous fun threads INCLUDING THIS ONE, and turned them into human rights debates. The list could be longer.
Now my argument there was not a comment on WW2 pilots, its the comment on aerial warfare itself. You condemn violence, as should we all, yet you do amongst people who have witnessed it, maybeyou should consider the people you are mixing with before making such arguments or comments. I play AH2 and I am a military man. You can say this about most of this community.
Listen penguin. IYou can argue all you like. But here it is, I respect you , but at the same tim I think your a very naieve. It is quite obvious you dont see both sides of an argument. Fact is a bland point. I can wager, if you held a debate with me in an open debate in front of people, spoken debate, with people off the street. I would win convincingly. Why?
Debate is the SWAYING OF OPINION, and opinion is not fact. The sun may be energy caused by a fusion reaction. HOWEVER, its not going to stop some people calling it the finger of god or something. All arguemtn depends on audience. I manufacture my arguments to suit a middleaged man with a love of history and conservative of politics. And wouldnt you know it, I get complimented, and most shoot you down. INCLUDING. me.
This isnt a my thing is biger contest penguin, truth is, I argue with you because its fun. However, ive grasped what you havent. That argument on fact alone NEVER works. It is OPINION. that wins a debate.
Rant over. Your turn flightless birdie