the Ta 152 correction wish

[alpini13]

a wish to end some AH confusion.
the AH page lists the Ta-152 as an H-0 model,the hangar in game lists the Ta-152 as an H-1 model,which is it? the H-0 model only had 40 produced,the H-1 model only had 17 produced,this is excluding prototypes,test aircraft and e and c models. so which is correct? the H-0 and H-1 had differences that include fuel loadout and up to 100 rounds for the 30mm cannon.
If we let a low production aircraft like this in the game why not other low produced aircraft that saw combat like the ar-234C,or the He-162,glouster meteor,Ta-152c1,RE-2005,Ki-100,ETC,some of these aircraft were built in greater quantity,saw more active service,and were more significant in the war.   I wish we had one set of rules governing what aircraft SHOULD be available for AH....instead what ever is felt like at the moment

[JUGgler]

a wish to end some AH confusion.
the AH page lists the Ta-152 as an H-0 model,the hangar in game lists the Ta-152 as an H-1 model,which is it? the H-0 model only had 40 produced,the H-1 model only had 17 produced,this is excluding prototypes,test aircraft and e and c models. so which is correct? the H-0 and H-1 had differences that include fuel loadout and up to 100 rounds for the 30mm cannon.
If we let a low production aircraft like this in the game why not other low produced aircraft that saw combat like the ar-234C,or the He-162,glouster meteor,Ta-152c1,RE-2005,Ki-100,ETC,some of these aircraft were built in greater quantity,saw more active service,and were more significant in the war.   I wish we had one set of rules governing what aircraft SHOULD be available for AH....instead what ever is felt like at the moment

I think HTC does have a set of guide lines for inclusion, They're just the only ones who know what they are  




JUGgler

[guncrasher]

perhaps a typo?  and does it really make a difference to tell the difference?

semp

[SlapShot]

I wish we had one set of rules governing what aircraft SHOULD be available for AH....instead what ever is felt like at the moment

There is only 1 set of rules ... HTC rules ... they have spelled out what the requirements are ... and they can, at any time, change/ignore the rules. The rules that they have set, doesn't mean that if a plane falls within those rules, it's an automatic "in".

[Krusty]

It's a typo. We clearly have the H-1. We have always had the H-1.

No need to make an issue where there is none.


Also, more H-1s were made than H-0s, but only about 12 saw service together. Many didn't get out to units in time and were still being built. We are talking very late in the war.


EDIT: Not sure which wikipedia article you got your info from, but the main differences between H-0 and H-1 were absence/presence of wing tanks, and a GM-1 system adding weight in the tail (although this arguably is not modeled in AH properly). The ammo load didn't change, and we already have 90 rounds for the 30mm hub gun.

[alpini13]

wrong again krusty,i didnt get any info from wiki.all current info on the ta152 series is   6 prototypes,40 h-0,...17 h-1....6 e-0/1(the photo recce version later changed to an H- suffix) 9 ta152 c-0/1 with two of the ta152 c-1 accepted and flown by jg301,no combat reports known. jg301 also flew the H-0 and H-1 models and a mix of FW190 d-9 and BF 109G-14 all at the same time,never achieving squadron strength of the ta-152. all other ta-152 were either not completed or destroyed by the germans or bombing before delivery(pilots picking them up at factory)or acceptance by luftwaffe and do not count as being produced .