Author Topic: IMHO  (Read 1249 times)

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: IMHO
« Reply #30 on: July 15, 2011, 11:20:28 AM »
zomg a perfect example how to turn a wish thread to a flame fest in one page...
plz never try it again, Jager. Thanks.
AoM
City of ice

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: IMHO
« Reply #31 on: July 15, 2011, 12:51:17 PM »
wow, from where I'm sitting, I had nothing to do with it past my initial comment, which you already talked to me about.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: IMHO
« Reply #32 on: July 15, 2011, 08:55:30 PM »
Alright, I'm confused as hell. Is Eskimo one of those ankle humpers that frequent channel 200? or is he a lesser version of MINNoWAR, constantly telling you how you need to do better?

I have never tuned 200 and I am not one who humps ankles.

If you wish to believe Tyrannis, the 11 year old laughing stock of these boards, that is your
decision and opinion and I respect that.

But do try to take my advice before you make a fool out of yourself here. I have the slightest
amount of hope for you here, unlike Tyrannis, who blew his chance within his first three posts.
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: IMHO
« Reply #33 on: July 16, 2011, 04:08:02 AM »
I have never tuned 200 and I am not one who humps ankles.

If you wish to believe Tyrannis, the 11 year old laughing stock of these boards, that is your
decision and opinion and I respect that.

But do try to take my advice before you make a fool out of yourself here. I have the slightest
amount of hope for you here, unlike Tyrannis, who blew his chance within his first three posts.
Did i not say he'd prob respond and derail this thread a little more?

Funny thing is, in another thread he said he had "hooked" me for responding to his blind-shots.

so i guess because he's responded to me that means ive hooked him and now he's the complete idiot of the entire board like he said applies to me, right?  :headscratch:

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: IMHO
« Reply #34 on: July 16, 2011, 03:12:40 PM »
At this point I'm neutral. While I do see your point, he helped me with something I thought was a bug.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Grundle1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: IMHO
« Reply #35 on: July 19, 2011, 04:48:13 PM »
Thanks for hijacking my thread!  It's ok, actually it got more interesting.   I'd say that most of the critical defeats suffered by Germany were inflicted by the Russians over a period of years starting with Stalingrad, the battle befor Moscow, Kursk, etc.  The Russians were engaged in ground fighting with the Germans for three years prior to D-Day.   Of course they were largely responsible for the defeat of Germany.  No question in my mind.   That's not to diminish the other allies.   Just look at where the Germans' best divisions and squadrons were located for most of the war.  Not Alabama, that's for sure...