After reading post after post of complaints about heavy bombers (especially the lanc) being used to unfairly bomb GVs I decided it was time to show some data. ESPECIALLY since I have not seen one piece of factual data in ANY post, all just being opinions, and speculations.
But it sure seems like there is alot of complaints about dive bombing lancs, maybe there is something to this.
These are current statistics for the current late war arena for aircraft performance against GVs
I included our our three non-perked heavies the B17, B24, and Lancaster. I included two dedicated attack aircraft, the IL2 and the A20 so we can compare how well these aircraft perform
Plane GV kills Total Kills GV Kill Ratio to aircraft % Killed By GV Total Losses % Loss to GV GV Kill/Death ratio
Lancaster 1180 2865 41% 1224 12686 9.6% 0.96
B17 275 3620 7.50% 424 9527 4.0% 0.64
B24 300 2753 10.10% 309 7978 3.8% 0.97
A20 2785 3929 70.90% 1987 2848 70.0% 1.40
IL2 1832 2197 83.34% 1147 1953 58.7% 1.60
As you can see that out of the heavies the lancaster truly is used far more against gv's as opposed to the B17 and B24 with 41% of its kills being vehicles. Only 9.6% of it's losses were from GVs, however its GV Kill/Death ratio is still less than 1 at .96 and it gets severely pwned compared with...
.....the A20 and IL2. These are uses almost exclusively against ground targets with 70.9 and 83.34 or their credited kills going against GV's. They fair much better against them as will with a K/D ratio at 1.4 and 1.6 respectfully.
To add my .02, with the posts about the dreaded "lancstuka" it seems that you tankers out there should be more concerned with dedicated attack aircraft, both the A20 and the IL2 have a favorable K/D ratio and both have destroyed significantly more vehicles than the Lancaster has. Further more GV's have a slightly better K/D against them. In short if a Lancaster attacks your tank, you have a much better chance against that then a "true" attack aircraft.