« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: An Interesting tank  (Read 1929 times)

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #15 on: August 15, 2011, 12:41:54 PM »
This wasnt nice, Jager.
Actually, without their commanders, they are just like everyone else. Some of them showed way above average skills and fighting spirit (f.e. Woody, Jazzi). Other thing, i would never ever follow orders in a cartoon game...
End of the troll.
Logged
AoM
City of ice

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #16 on: August 15, 2011, 01:31:27 PM »
Sorry, but I have no use for members of multi-wing squadrons. As I've said, it dances on the spirit of the 32 person limit on squads.
Logged
Quote from: Arlo on April 28, 2014, 06:25:38 PM
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Lepape2

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 597
      • YouTube musician/video channel
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #17 on: August 15, 2011, 05:18:58 PM »

Landkreuzer P. 1000 (tons) Ratte
Note: Doubtful source


Or even more stupidly large:
The Landkreuzer P. 1500 Monster


« Last Edit: August 15, 2011, 05:26:06 PM by Lepape2 »
Logged
Jug Movie 1 - Hunt or Prey
Jug Movie 2 - The Jug's Tail

Offline Skyguns MKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #18 on: August 15, 2011, 07:54:09 PM »
Quote from: Tank-Ace on August 15, 2011, 11:01:00 AM
Not to mention they dance on the spirit of the 32 person squad limit.

actualy we have 2 =V= squads to excell 32  :D
Logged

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #19 on: August 15, 2011, 07:59:49 PM »
you have 3 wings with 32, 14, and 21 members for a total of 67 members. Also notice I don't much like the CJ's either.


Not singling you guys out for anything, I just don't how you guys twist the rules, if you don't quite bend them.
Logged
Quote from: Arlo on April 28, 2014, 06:25:38 PM
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Skyguns MKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #20 on: August 15, 2011, 08:22:01 PM »
Quote from: Tank-Ace on August 15, 2011, 07:59:49 PM
you have 3 wings with 32, 14, and 21 members for a total of 67 members. Also notice I don't much like the CJ's either.


Not singling you guys out for anything, I just don't how you guys twist the rules, if you don't quite bend them.

multiple squads never combined forces in WWII?
Logged

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #21 on: August 15, 2011, 08:31:34 PM »
Not saying that, I'm saying HTC tried to end super squads with the 32 person limit.
Logged
Quote from: Arlo on April 28, 2014, 06:25:38 PM
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #22 on: August 15, 2011, 09:18:49 PM »
Quote from: Skyguns MKII on August 14, 2011, 05:12:49 PM
that thing would of never even be able to take off, no engine was powerful enough at the time and naval guns? too heavy

That was a real plane. Without the huge naval guns of course, and it did fly, twice.

It crashed and killed everyone on the second flight.
Logged
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline AHTbolt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 582
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #23 on: August 16, 2011, 04:32:16 PM »
Logged
AWWWWW CRAP YOU SHOT WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the desert somewhere west of Kuwait 1991.

Offline Skyguns MKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #24 on: August 17, 2011, 12:17:31 AM »
Quote from: Tupac on August 15, 2011, 09:18:49 PM
That was a real plane. Without the huge naval guns of course, and it did fly, twice.

It crashed and killed everyone on the second flight.

i thought that thing was only a concept plane?! more infro please.
Logged

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #25 on: August 17, 2011, 03:48:22 AM »
google the Kalinin Ka-7
After its crash, Stalin executed the designer   :banana:
Logged
AoM
City of ice

Offline Skyguns MKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #26 on: August 17, 2011, 03:55:45 AM »
Quote from: Debrody on August 17, 2011, 03:48:22 AM
Stalin executed the designer   :banana:
ah man bad move stalin, many great planes had crashes
Logged

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #27 on: August 17, 2011, 08:23:07 AM »
Quote from: Skyguns MKII on August 17, 2011, 03:55:45 AM
ah man bad move stalin, many great planes had crashes
heh... bad move stalin... i could think of many things to say here...
Logged
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Skyguns MKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1067
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #28 on: August 17, 2011, 04:19:25 PM »
Quote from: 321BAR on August 17, 2011, 08:23:07 AM
heh... bad move stalin... i could think of many things to say here...

what? He mad MANY bad moves haha
Logged

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: An Interesting tank
« Reply #29 on: August 17, 2011, 06:32:58 PM »
Fairly positive view of the big beast here:

http://www.pilotfriend.com/photo_albums/potty/8.htm

Logged
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »