Author Topic: B-29  (Read 2558 times)

Offline FBCrabby

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 379
      • AHFreebirds.com
Re: B-29
« Reply #30 on: September 23, 2011, 03:32:28 AM »
Actually B29 is used quite often - the catch is they're always 30K+ :D

And especially in my case I tend to be floating around 45-48K with my B29's - but thats usually known when I lite up Channel 200 telling my position daring anyone to come get me   :devil
AH-Freebirds.com - FB$ - Proud Squadron Of Aces High II

Actively Recruiting! - Join FB$ Today!

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: B-29
« Reply #31 on: September 23, 2011, 05:53:23 AM »
Actually B29 is used quite often - the catch is they're always 30K+ :D

And especially in my case I tend to be floating around 45-48K with my B29's - but thats usually known when I lite up Channel 200 telling my position daring anyone to come get me   :devil
If thats fun for you, flying 2-3 hours alone... i rather go diggin.
AoM
City of ice

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: B-29
« Reply #32 on: September 23, 2011, 09:35:37 AM »
By the last round of voting I decided to vote for whatever was running against the B29. Me410 still lost...


I went in voting for the A26
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline tmetal

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
Re: B-29
« Reply #33 on: September 23, 2011, 01:30:47 PM »
For those who like to fly the B29 or anybody who just wants to try it out. The AvA setup is going to use B29s this week, so free B29s for anybody who wants them. No need to protect your perks with high alt, and one of the bases with the B29 enabled will have air starts so no long boring climb either.  The message of the day for the arena should detail which airbases have the B29 for use, plus there is no wait for side switching so fly'em, kill'em or both.

/end hijack
The real problem is anyone should feel like they can come to this forum and make a wish without being treated in a derogatory manner.  The only discussion should be centered around whether it would work, or how it would work and so on always in a respectful manner.

-Skuzzy 5/18/17

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: B-29
« Reply #34 on: September 23, 2011, 04:50:43 PM »
I postcount postcount postcount postcount postcount postcount postcount B29.

Guess postcount.

Fixed               :devil
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: B-29
« Reply #35 on: September 23, 2011, 04:53:03 PM »
Fixed               :devil
^
|


i can tell that this is going to turn into a purse fight because of that... :uhoh not to mention you probably "fixed" that for your own post-count aswell.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: B-29
« Reply #36 on: September 23, 2011, 05:08:17 PM »

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: B-29
« Reply #37 on: September 23, 2011, 07:48:22 PM »
LOL  sorry.  I'm just mad that AH is closed down  :furious :furious :mad: :mad: :mad: and one of the best evenings for flyin is goin down the tubes.
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
Re: B-29
« Reply #38 on: September 26, 2011, 01:12:20 AM »
I wanted the B29.  I voted for it.  I flew it once.  Its there if I ever want to fly it again.  WIN/WIN  :cheers:
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: B-29
« Reply #39 on: September 26, 2011, 01:56:19 AM »
"I remember some people whine that the B-29 will ruin the game and people will milk-run the bases consistently. That does not appear to be true now."

I remember that some people said it will be perked so high it will rarely be seen and if it is seen it is seen so high and fast you will not catch it. That appears to be true now.

"I wanted the B29.  I voted for it.  I flew it once.  Its there if I ever want to fly it again.  WIN/WIN"

I rest my case. Clearly something HTC did well to spend lots of time to implement.  :bhead

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: B-29
« Reply #40 on: September 26, 2011, 03:17:42 PM »
I don't see what the problem is. HTC spent time on a bomber that can be used if wanted to. Rather than other hangar queens that noone else dare flies.
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: B-29
« Reply #41 on: September 26, 2011, 03:30:48 PM »
I don't see what the problem is. HTC spent time on a bomber that can be used if wanted to. Rather than other hangar queens that noone else dare flies.
It's only because the B-25c's have no tail gun is the only reason I don't fly them.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Rich52

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 868
Re: B-29
« Reply #42 on: September 26, 2011, 07:19:43 PM »
I remember the drama whenever the B-29 was brought up and the Biblical predictions of doom that would follow. Horror stories of nuked bases, no HQ ever being safe, shrieks of "im quitting if", and mostly by those you couldnt get out of LW fighter rides if you bribed them. Who never flew bombers anyway.

So finnaly it came and had almost no impact. Less even then the perked fighter rides. Had it been brought in sooner maybe some of those bomber squads would still be around and the ones still left would have more then 3 members.
Yes, your on "Ignore"

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9506
Re: B-29
« Reply #43 on: September 26, 2011, 10:10:08 PM »
I remember the drama whenever the B-29 was brought up and the Biblical predictions of doom that would follow. Horror stories of nuked bases, no HQ ever being safe, shrieks of "im quitting if", and mostly by those you couldnt get out of LW fighter rides if you bribed them. Who never flew bombers anyway.

So finnaly it came and had almost no impact. Less even then the perked fighter rides. Had it been brought in sooner maybe some of those bomber squads would still be around and the ones still left would have more then 3 members.


Those discussions implicitly assumed that the B-29 would be easily available.  If you could grab a B-29 formation today, without risking perks, those predictions might well have come true. 

- oldman

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: B-29
« Reply #44 on: September 26, 2011, 10:19:39 PM »

Those discussions implicitly assumed that the B-29 would be easily available.  If you could grab a B-29 formation today, without risking perks, those predictions might well have come true. 

- oldman

Possibly, but it was just as silly to assume the B-29 would not be moderately or highly perked.
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.