..... WHY!!!

[skorpion]

Yes the m4 is a better tank than the LEE, but the m4 isent an EW tank now is it?

like i stated before, IN ITS TIMELINE, the lee was a very good tank against its opponents.  you cant tell others to do more research when your yourself dont even have your own facts straight. 

the M4 obviously isnt in the EW era, but its the best sub we got. you tell me to use a Pz4 in EW for the stug when it didnt even see service till late 1943, out of the EW timezone.


still ego boosting?

[Tyrannis]

the M4 obviously isnt in the EW era, but its the best sub we got. you tell me to use a Pz4 in EW for the stug when it didnt even see service till late 1943, out of the EW timezone.


still ego boosting?

thought you were putting me on the ole ignore list skorpy, see, you just HAVVVEEE to respond everytime i say something. 

ok im done guys, i apologize, i didnt know skorp would throw such a fit over his precious stuggy. i'll try to avoid upsetting the little one so much in the future.  please forgive me. 

[skorpion]

thought you were putting me on the ole ignore list skorpy, see, you just HAVVVEEE to respond everytime i say something. 

ok im done guys, i apologize, i didnt know skorp would throw such a fit over his precious stuggy. i'll try to avoid upsetting the little one so much in the future.  please forgive me. 

still egoboosting. you find a reason to attack everyone in a thread dont you? how sad. not to mention you reply before i even get off the thread. butthurt about your M3 Lee being outdone by a StuG with a better FOV and armor?


i'll let you ponder that while your being ignored.

[Tyrannis]

still egoboosting. you find a reason to attack everyone in a thread dont you? how sad. not to mention you reply before i even get off the thread. butthurt about your M3 Lee being outdone by a StuG with a better FOV and armor?


i'll let you ponder that while your being ignored.

who else in this thread have i "attacked"?  certainly not "everyone".
the stug AUSF G wouldnt even fit into the EW timeline that the LEE would, therefore they'd never meet in combat (unless you up them both in ether MW-LW) but AvA concerned, nether one would fight eachother i dont believe.

So how am i "Afraid" a tank will outdo another tank, when nether one of them will fight against eachother in their own respected timelines within AH.

you say i have no logic, and then you type up this complete farse that makes the finger point at you. 

ok guys im really out, im sorry, im trying to cut down on my attitude on the BBS, im getting there (sorta  )

PUFFFFF 

[Volron]

[chaser]

Anyone else notice that like 90% of the threads on the BBS end with tyrannis and skorpion tolling each other? I don't think I've ever seen two people troll each other in as many threads as these two have.

[Tupac]

Anyone else notice that like 90% of the threads on the BBS end with tyrannis and skorpion tolling each other? I don't think I've ever seen two people troll each other in as many threads as these two have.

They're in an eternal pissing match.


They should be buried next to each other so they can troll in the afterlife.

[MachFly]

Anyone else notice that like 90% of the threads on the BBS end with tyrannis and skorpion tolling each other? I don't think I've ever seen two people troll each other in as many threads as these two have.

Yes.
I recomend HTC makes them a private section on the forums for they can stop hijacking all the threads.   

[321BAR]

you want a tank with a crappy 37mm top gun, and a limited range 75mm side gun on a tank with less armor than a M4?

heres your M3 lee, up a M4/75 and only turn the turret about 10 degrees to the left/right.   

Anyone else notice that like 90% of the threads on the BBS end with tyrannis and skorpion tolling each other? I don't think I've ever seen two people troll each other in as many threads as these two have.

anyone notice that its skorpion thats always starting the trolling match?...

who else in this thread have i "attacked"?   certainly not "everyone".
the stug AUSF G wouldnt even fit into the EW timeline that the LEE would, therefore they'd never meet in combat (unless you up them both in ether MW-LW) but AvA concerned, nether one would fight eachother i dont believe.

So how am i "Afraid" a tank will outdo another tank, when nether one of them will fight against eachother in their own respected timelines within AH.

you say i have no logic, and then you type up this complete farse that makes the finger point at you.  

ok guys im really out, im sorry, im trying to cut down on my attitude on the BBS, im getting there (sorta  )

PUFFFFF  

and also read this last post because skorpion you started this fighting yet again and tyrannis was just posting his opinions.

also skorpion last time i checked tyrannis was responding to what you were saying and you baited him for a troll. stop arguing and stay on topic because all i see in this thread is tyrannis defending his position. Simple grow up because this is just plain dumb

[Hap]

(Image removed from quote.)

[DeadStik]

They should be buried next to each other so they can troll in the afterlife.

LOL! Excellent!

[M0nkey_Man]

I'm just happy I can finally do jeep speeds with a 75 mm gun on top

+1

[M0nkey_Man]

They're in an eternal pissing match.


They should be buried next to each other so they can troll in the afterlife.

[Rino]

WHY THE M-18! WHY NOT THE CHURCHILL OR MATILDA WHY WHY WHY!  

     Just to aggravate you, I guess.  It couldn't be that either of those two would be no competition for the
current hangar list could it?   I know that the GV ranks are just crawling with folks that want a horrendously
slow tank armed with a peashooter 

[SmokinLoon]

you want a tank with a crappy 37mm top gun, and a limited range 75mm side gun on a tank with less armor than a M4?

heres your M3 lee, up a M4/75 and only turn the turret about 10 degrees to the left/right.   

"crappy"??? tsk tsk tsk. Know your time frames, jr.  The 2 Pdr, 37mm, 50mm, 45mm, etc etc from the early war AT guns were the standard of their day.  They did their job and did it well.  Compared to LW, they are lesser, sure.  But "crappy" they are not.