Author Topic: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10  (Read 410 times)

Offline alpini13

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« on: October 18, 2011, 09:46:53 AM »
  please add this aircraft   G-10 Series
The Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10 series was unusual in that it consisted of new and remanufactured airframes of earlier model Gs equipped with the more powerful Daimler Benz DB 605D series engine. As a result, there was little standardization beyond the common use of the Erla-Haube (or "Galland Hood") improved vision canopy. Even so, the G-10 proved to be the fastest G model.

Armament: One 30mm MK 108 cannon or mg/151 20mm cannon,and two 13mm MG 131 machine guns
Engine: One Daimler-Benz DB 605D inverted V rated at 1,850 hp for take-off
Maximum speed: 426 mph at 24,280 ft.
Range: 373 miles
Ceiling: 41,400 ft.
Span: 32 ft.
Length: 29 ft. 5 in.
Height: 8 ft. 2.5 in.
Weight: 5,800 lbs.


Offline Hap

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3908
Re: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2011, 09:55:16 AM »
used to have it; k4 replaced it.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2011, 10:07:15 AM »
of all the planes you posted this morning, this one has the least chance of seeing the light of day (as much as us luftweinies want it), better chance of getting the /as motors for the g6 and g14. personally, i'd rather have the db605as engines for the g6 and g14.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2011, 11:04:58 AM »
I say give the G-6 its rightful 30mm and then the 109's have their bases covered, imo.   :)
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Ardy123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
Re: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2011, 12:51:17 PM »
I say give the G-6 its rightful 30mm and then the 109's have their bases covered, imo.   :)

na, we need the high alt versions of the g6 and the g14. That would fill the much needed gap in the scenarios against the 8th airforce bombing runs.
Yeah, that's right, you just got your rear handed to you by a fuggly puppet!
==Army of Muppets==
(Bunnies)

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2011, 01:53:13 PM »
Do we have all the 109s covered that is needed?  Then again, we got the P-47M so what the heck.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2011, 01:54:33 PM »
Do we have all the 109s covered that is needed? 
define "needed"...some of us don't think so but then, we're just luftweenies...
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Messerschmitt Bf 109G-10
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2011, 03:07:01 PM »
define "needed"...some of us don't think so but then, we're just luftweenies...

Have to please the luftdweebs some how.   :D

J/K. To be honest, i am all for G-10 just like all for the D-30. Lets diversify the plane set as much possible as we can.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group