Author Topic: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?  (Read 1538 times)

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #15 on: October 23, 2011, 02:46:38 PM »
That is irrelevant.  That Germany may have known of the B-23 does not translate to a line fighter pilot memorizing an aircraft he has never seen.  It is still the much less likely cause of the text than a typo or mental hiccup.
it's not even close to irrelevant. pilots were given aircraft identification manuals to memorize and in many cases the manuals were wrong. in the field updates in the form of written descriptions, diagrams and sometimes photos were sent to squadrons from high command so the line pilots had the intel.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #16 on: October 23, 2011, 04:09:26 PM »
it's not even close to irrelevant. pilots were given aircraft identification manuals to memorize and in many cases the manuals were wrong. in the field updates in the form of written descriptions, diagrams and sometimes photos were sent to squadrons from high command so the line pilots had the intel.
Yes, but he probably isn't going to ID a A-20, DB-3 or B-25 as a B-23.  Occam's Razor states that the simplest explanation is usually correct and that is a simple typo or brian hiccup.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #17 on: October 23, 2011, 05:00:05 PM »
It is simpler than you think - the Douglas DB-73 "Bank" was the export version of the B-25 that was delivered to the Russians. 

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10423
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #18 on: October 23, 2011, 06:44:42 PM »
It is simpler than you think - the Douglas DB-73 "Bank" was the export version of the B-25 that was delivered to the Russians. 





  Interesting,I was going to tell Scherf that the A20 was also known as DB-7 and now we have a Douglas DB-73 to add to the confussion. Scherf any mention of the tail configuration?  That might help sove the mystery.


   :salute

Offline eddiek

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #19 on: October 23, 2011, 06:47:13 PM »
It is simpler than you think - the Douglas DB-73 "Bank" was the export version of the B-25 that was delivered to the Russians. 

Well, since the B-25 was manufactured by North American and not Douglas, you are wrong, sir.   :headscratch:

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2011, 06:50:15 PM »
I think I may have cracked it. Tracked down my man on the Tony Woods lists - found the night in question, he did indeed put in three claims near Tilsit, for TB-3s!

Must be a "march of time" issue - remembered differently for some reason. The contemporary records say it wasn't US-built aircraft at all....

Many thanks for the help gents, sorry for any trouble caused / time consumed.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #21 on: October 24, 2011, 06:52:47 PM »
I think I may have cracked it. Tracked down my man on the Tony Woods lists - found the night in question, he did indeed put in three claims near Tilsit, for TB-3s!

Must be a "march of time" issue - remembered differently for some reason. The contemporary records say it wasn't US-built aircraft at all....

Many thanks for the help gents, sorry for any trouble caused / time consumed.

 :huh  :confused:  :uhoh  TB-3s!???!?





How much was he drinkin'?
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #22 on: October 24, 2011, 08:02:25 PM »
Well, since the B-25 was manufactured by North American and not Douglas, you are wrong, sir.   :headscratch:

Found it here:
http://www.harpoondatabases.com/Encyclopedia/Entry2058.aspx

Note the picture of B-25s with russian markings and the title "Douglas DB-73 Bank".  Maybe Douglas got a contract to build the export version of the B-25??  It isn't unprecedented for one aircraft maker to do production runs on anothers design. 
« Last Edit: October 24, 2011, 08:12:44 PM by EagleDNY »

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #23 on: October 24, 2011, 08:02:34 PM »
Bah. DB-3s.

Actually, 2 DB-3s and a PS-84, whatever that is.
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15506
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #24 on: October 24, 2011, 08:03:51 PM »
Wow, that TB-3 is so cool looking!  It's almost like a steam punk aircraft.

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9397
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #25 on: October 24, 2011, 09:56:13 PM »
Wow, that TB-3 is so cool looking!  It's almost like a steam punk aircraft.


Can we have that instead of the Meteor?

No, really!

- oldman

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15506
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #26 on: October 25, 2011, 02:38:22 AM »
I want this:


Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #27 on: October 25, 2011, 05:16:08 PM »
Bah. DB-3s.

Actually, 2 DB-3s and a PS-84, whatever that is.

Ooooh, ooh... close to finding the answer to all your questions, you are.

(http://www.vectorsite.net/avc47_2.html)
« Last Edit: October 25, 2011, 05:18:27 PM by Babalonian »
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #28 on: November 02, 2011, 09:53:11 AM »
Found it here:
http://www.harpoondatabases.com/Encyclopedia/Entry2058.aspx

Note the picture of B-25s with russian markings and the title "Douglas DB-73 Bank".  Maybe Douglas got a contract to build the export version of the B-25??  It isn't unprecedented for one aircraft maker to do production runs on anothers design. 
i dont know if that site knows anything about the B-25 even in their literature they state "the Douglas  DB-73 was an export version of the DOUGLAS B-25 Mitchell. To my knowledge Douglas never made the B-25 even under contract  :headscratch:
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Re: US twin-engine buffs in Russki-land, mid-44?
« Reply #29 on: November 02, 2011, 08:02:33 PM »
i dont know if that site knows anything about the B-25 even in their literature they state "the Douglas  DB-73 was an export version of the DOUGLAS B-25 Mitchell. To my knowledge Douglas never made the B-25 even under contract  :headscratch:

You are right - that other site is full of it on the DB-73 ---  however, I did find a translation at lend-lease.ru on the B-25 in russian service:
http://lend-lease.airforce.ru/english/articles/akvilyanov/index.htm

It seems we did export the B-25 to the Russians. 

There IS a DB-73 reference as well, but it is for a french designation for the DB-7B (Boston) made to French Specs:
http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_douglas_DB-7_France.html