Neither. I'm actually a very good person and a rather level headed individual. I simply do not jump to conclusions and I certainly do not jump on bandwagons (not keen on the mob mentality) since as I've already said, we dont know the entire story and we never will. Reading someone's testimony does not make for a guilty verdict, I remind you.
It is a sad deal no doubt, but firing Joe Paterno was not the right call, imo.
So what part of JoePa seeing Sandusky still around campus for years, exercising emeritus status, and still having young boys in tow while going in and out of the locker room after one of his staffers has already reported abuse to him once, is following due procedure?
This is normal behavior?
I hope that, for the sake of these boys (or men now) that he did none of the things they say he did and that it is all made up. I really do.
I also understand playing Devil's advocate, but not Devil's idiot...
JoePa did not report anything to the police, did not follow through with what he reported to see if the allegations were true or not and didn't think twice as to why Sandusky was still allowed to roam freely upon campus.
Most normal folks would actively pursue the status of an investigation of this type.
Especially if it pertains to their #2 guy.
In this case, doing nothing was just as bad as intentionally covering it up.
That goes for all involved.
