Author Topic: WWII Bomb disposal  (Read 953 times)

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2011, 02:21:14 PM »
 :eek: That could take out a neighborhood block

yup, its a cannister bomb not a GP/SAP bomb. that means just enough metal to stop it falling apart on the way down, all the rest is torpex :uhoh


edit: they were known as blockbusters for just that reason, I'm pretty sure thats where the term comes from. the blast overpressure from the cookies would lift floors and roofs so buildings collapsed. the next wave of lancs would drop massive numbers of incendiaries to torch the exposed buildings. nasty but effective.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2011, 02:49:18 PM by RTHolmes »
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2011, 02:23:48 PM »
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07

Offline DMVIAGRA

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 321
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2011, 02:58:11 PM »
ya, just trying to imagine how many mines cover Europe and other areas around the world is pretty hard
Alright chaps, time to get your knives out and prod the dirt for mines.

Offline F22RaptorDude

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3641
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2011, 03:34:02 PM »
yup, its a cannister bomb not a GP/SAP bomb. that means just enough metal to stop it falling apart on the way down, all the rest is torpex :uhoh


edit: they were known as blockbusters for just that reason, I'm pretty sure thats where the term comes from. the blast overpressure from the cookies would lift floors and roofs so buildings collapsed. the next wave of lancs would drop massive numbers of incendiaries to torch the exposed buildings. nasty but effective.
I recall reading about those in my book about lancasters, imagine if that was a grand slam bomb  :uhoh 4,000 pounds to that bomb as apposed to 12,000 pounds of ground removing power!  :O
Reaper in a T-50-2 Scout tank in 10 seconds flat

Offline 2ADoc

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 523
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2011, 03:42:58 PM »
I have spent a lot of time with UXO's, everything from an SA-7 that I uncovered with a motor grader, to untold amount of mortars that we ran over with vibratory rollers.  Mortars were so common it got to the point we would move them out of our way so we didn't have to stop the job for the 4 hours it took for EOD get there, and pick the thing up and throw it in the back of the truck.  A lot of old Russian Anti personel mines again very common.  One of the biggest was an old rather large welcome package left behind from the good old USA left for us lowly subcontractors to find 2 years after the invasion of Iraq.  All that said UXO's don't bother me a bit, but something that big, that old, and that unstable, I can promise that I do believe that I would be somewhere on vacation, in some non extradition country in South America, but that is where I usually go on vacation.
Takeoffs are optional, landings aren't
Vini Vedi Velcro
See Rule 4, 13, 14.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2011, 04:53:15 PM »
I recall reading about those in my book about lancasters, imagine if that was a grand slam bomb  :uhoh 4,000 pounds to that bomb as apposed to 12,000 pounds of ground removing power!  :O

Grand Slam bombs were 22,000lb with 9408lb of Torpex.

The 12,000lb Tall Boy had 5348lb of Torpex.

Now if you really want to :uhoh try the 12000lb High Capacity bomb > 9549lb of Torpex.

http://www.wwiiequipment.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=43:bombs&Itemid=60&layout=default

Offline F22RaptorDude

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3641
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2011, 06:28:41 PM »
Grand Slam bombs were 22,000lb with 9408lb of Torpex.

The 12,000lb Tall Boy had 5348lb of Torpex.

Now if you really want to :uhoh try the 12000lb High Capacity bomb > 9549lb of Torpex.

http://www.wwiiequipment.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=43:bombs&Itemid=60&layout=default
my bad got those mixed up, but still even more  :eek:
Reaper in a T-50-2 Scout tank in 10 seconds flat

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: WWII Bomb disposal
« Reply #22 on: December 05, 2011, 03:55:59 AM »
This is no joke if it goes up, and the area is densely populated.
A couple of years ago, some 2 x 1000 pounders were discovered in the sea just outside Reykjavik, Iceland. There were anti-sub bombs, loaded with torpex.
A whole street along the sea-side was evacuated, while the coast guard blew them up. It went without harm, but made quite a show!
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)