Author Topic: A26?  (Read 743 times)

Offline bearclaw

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
A26?
« on: January 28, 2012, 10:30:52 PM »
History: The A-26, the last
    aircraft designated as an "attack bomber," was designed to replace the Douglas
    A-20 Havoc/Boston. It incorporated many improvements over the earlier Douglas designs. The
    first three XA-26 prototypes first flew in July 1942, and each
    was configured differently: Number One as a daylight bomber with a glass nose, Number Two
    as a gun-laden night-fighter, and Number Three as a ground-attack platform, with a
    75-millimeter cannon in the nose. This final variant, eventually called the A-26B,
    was chosen for production.
Upon its delivery to the 9th Air Force in Europe
    in November 1944 (and the Pacific Theater shortly thereafter), the A-26 became the fastest
    US bomber of WWII. The A-26C, with slightly-modified armament,
    was introduced in 1945. The A-26s combat career was cut short by the end of the war, and
    because no other use could be found for them, many A-26s were converted to JD-1
    target tugs for the US Navy.
A strange aircraft-designation swap occurred in
    1948, when the Martin B-26 Marauder was deactivated and the Douglas A-26 was re-designated
    the B-26. (It kept this designation until 1962.) B-26s went on
    to serve extensively in both the Korean and Vietnam wars. In Vietnam, they were commonly
    used in the Counter-Insurgency (COIN) role, with very heavy armament and extra power. This
    version, the B-26K, was based in Thailand and was, to confuse
    things further, called the A-26 for political reasons. B-26s
    were also used for training, VIP transport, cargo, night reconnaissance, missile guidance
    and tracking, and as drone-control platforms.
Post-war uses of the airplane included luxurious
    executive transport (Smith Tempo I; Tempo II and Biscayne
    26; LAS Super-26; Berry Silver-Sixty; Monarch-26;
    On-Mark Marketeer/Marksman), aerial surveying and, most notably,
    firefighting, a role in which it is still occasionally used today.
Nicknames: Unknown
Specifications (A-26B):
    Engines: Two 2000hp Pratt & Whitney R-2800-79 radial piston
    engines
    Weight: Empty 22,370 lbs., Maximum Takeoff 35,000 lbs.
    Wing Span: 70ft. 0in.
    Length: 50ft. 9in.
    Height: 18ft. 6in.
    Performance:
        Maximum Speed at 15,000 ft: 355 mph
        Ceiling: 22,100 ft
        Range: 1,400 miles
    Armament:
        Six 12.7mm (0.5 in.) machine guns in
    nose
        Two 12.7mm (0.5 in.) machine guns each
    in ventral and dorsal turrets
        6000 lbs. of bombs
        Eight 127mm (5-inch) rockets
Number Built:  2,446
Number Still Airworthy: 
   ~40


Let Me know if this would work in.the game
Bearclaw

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17423
Re: A26?
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2012, 11:51:08 PM »
Yes i know the planeset needs lots of other planes that hardly will be used but adding the a26 would be awesome.  perked it like hell or dont perk it, it dont matter it will be used more than the m18  :x :x :x :x.



semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: A26?
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2012, 08:32:18 AM »
+178935718934791349121259  :x :x :x :x :x :x
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: A26?
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2012, 08:43:27 AM »
Though it is a reasonable request (I even have a slot prepped for it on my fighter-bomber performance spreadsheet) I don't think it would be a good idea at this time.

Additionally, I do have concerns about what the "American only" crowd will turn to once the few remaining American aircraft are added.  After the A-26, P-61, SB2C and TBD are added I have a feeling the the calls for just missed it/post war stuff such as the F7F and P-80 and WWII stuff that doesn't fit well in AH such as the PBY-5 will become deafening.

Obviously the A-26 should be added, but it would be nice to see some other stuff first to flesh out some other nation's plane sets.  These additions don't even have to be hangar queens as things like the Tu-2, Yak-3, Ki-44, J2M and G.55 would all see at least moderate use.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: A26?
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2012, 09:04:52 AM »
Nah.  It is 31st down on the list to be added to AH.   ;)
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Rich52

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 868
Re: A26?
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2012, 09:43:21 AM »
TU-2 would see more then moderate use. I bet it would become the premier medium bomber/attacker in the game.
Yes, your on "Ignore"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: A26?
« Reply #6 on: January 29, 2012, 09:46:25 AM »
TU-2 would see more then moderate use. I bet it would become the premier medium bomber/attacker in the game.
Its gun defenses are pretty light, though it is relatively speedy and probably has a good climb rate.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Seadog36

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Re: A26?
« Reply #7 on: January 29, 2012, 12:27:54 PM »
Its gun defenses are pretty light, though it is relatively speedy and probably has a good climb rate.
~
 2x fixed 20mm in the wings~ mean

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: A26?
« Reply #8 on: January 29, 2012, 01:18:26 PM »
~
 2x fixed 20mm in the wings~ mean

Those aren't really defensive though.  More offensive.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Rich52

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 868
Re: A26?
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2012, 03:33:42 PM »
Its gun defenses are pretty light, though it is relatively speedy and probably has a good climb rate.

And a heck of a bomb load. It really had a lot of different strengths from existing mediums. The speed of the KI-67, the bomb load of the JU or B-26, the maneuverability of the JU, and with 9 0.50 Berezin a trio wouldnt exactly be helpless. Most of all with two wing cannon as well.
Yes, your on "Ignore"

Offline Seadog36

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Re: A26?
« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2012, 03:36:38 PM »
Those aren't really defensive though.  More offensive.

I understand that Karnak, I'm sure there are all sorts of "gamey" offensive applications for something like that...including strafing Storch pilots :lol, It would be a neat LW addition to the game, as would the A-26.