Author Topic: historically accurate cockpits?  (Read 1308 times)

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #15 on: February 02, 2012, 11:03:56 AM »
It's hard enough for me to figure out what the n1k's instruments are telling me.
  Please don't
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6558
      • Aces High Events
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #16 on: February 02, 2012, 11:45:31 AM »
There are many kinds of Yaks, though I would enjoy knowing the model in question, so we should not by any means assume it was a Yak-9 or Yak-3.

Since when does a rumor have any relationship whatsoever to the facts. :)

80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #17 on: February 02, 2012, 11:47:56 AM »
Since when does a rumor have any relationship whatsoever to the facts. :)



High School
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #18 on: February 02, 2012, 05:51:24 PM »
Sometimes I'm surprised enough that German planes' gauges are in atmospheres instead of inches of mercury...

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #19 on: February 02, 2012, 07:51:38 PM »
Sometimes I'm surprised enough that German planes' gauges are in atmospheres instead of inches of mercury...

what about mmHg?
« Last Edit: February 02, 2012, 07:53:40 PM by kvuo75 »
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #20 on: February 02, 2012, 07:56:44 PM »
what about mmHg?
Not exactly a US measurement, and none of the other aircraft in the game have that AFIAK... I think Japanese and British aircraft have 'boost', I'm not really sure what that means.

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2012, 07:58:21 PM »
Not exactly a US measurement, and none of the other aircraft in the game have that AFIAK... I think Japanese and British aircraft have 'boost', I'm not really sure what that means.

IIRC the japanese show boost in mmHg

I'm assuming that is any pressure above or below ambient.

kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2012, 08:07:07 PM »
IIRC the japanese show boost in mmHg

I'm assuming that is any pressure above or below ambient.


That doesn't really make sense, the A6M5 tops at '30' boost, which by that logic would be 790 mmHg or ~1.03 atm
Most of the German fighters top out in the 1.2-1.4 atm range.
British boost may be in inHg but it says 'LB' on the dial... although I kind of doubt it's psi..

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
Re: historically accurate cockpits?
« Reply #23 on: February 02, 2012, 08:28:58 PM »
That doesn't really make sense, the A6M5 tops at '30' boost, which by that logic would be 790 mmHg or ~1.03 atm
Most of the German fighters top out in the 1.2-1.4 atm range.
British boost may be in inHg but it says 'LB' on the dial... although I kind of doubt it's psi..

Yea I need to either remember wtf I'm talking about, or do some research :)  :cheers:

my drunken self has enough reading for tonite: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pressure_measurement
« Last Edit: February 02, 2012, 08:44:47 PM by kvuo75 »
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.