Author Topic: Intelligent arguments  (Read 682 times)

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6489
Re: Intelligent arguments
« Reply #15 on: February 17, 2012, 09:03:47 PM »
it's not what I fly.  but what I see what others fly.

and you are lying when you say the only plane i fly is the p51, look at the stats :ahand.


semp

Since you have called me a liar, I crunched some numbers in hope that we could have an intelligent argument about it.

For the record, the following statistics were gathered from the AH stats pages and concern the previous twelve months:

Statistics for semp, LW tours 133-144:

Total kills+deaths in fighter aircraft: 5596
Total number of fighter aircraft with recorded kills and/or deaths: 35  (this number is quite surprising and almost supports your argument)
Total number of kills+deaths in P-51D: 4181
Percentage of total kills+deaths in the P-51D: 74.7%

For comparison sake, my kills+deaths from the same period only comprised 13 more fighter planes than yours did.  However, my top killer claimed a relatively small 12.8% of the total kills+deaths in that time.  When I posted that the P-51D was the only plane you fly, it wasn't literally meant that you never use other planes; only that you use them, shall we say - rather sparingly.  If you want to get technical, you did use fighters other than the P-51D 25.3% of the time.  So from a black and white point of view, I was wrong.  From a practical point of view, I wasn't lying at all.   :angel:
Snuggie - voted "Sexiest Man Alive" for the entire Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere!

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17423
Re: Intelligent arguments
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2012, 01:16:26 AM »
Since you have called me a liar, I crunched some numbers in hope that we could have an intelligent argument about it.

For the record, the following statistics were gathered from the AH stats pages and concern the previous twelve months:

Statistics for semp, LW tours 133-144:

Total kills+deaths in fighter aircraft: 5596
Total number of fighter aircraft with recorded kills and/or deaths: 35  (this number is quite surprising and almost supports your argument)
Total number of kills+deaths in P-51D: 4181
Percentage of total kills+deaths in the P-51D: 74.7%

For comparison sake, my kills+deaths from the same period only comprised 13 more fighter planes than yours did.  However, my top killer claimed a relatively small 12.8% of the total kills+deaths in that time.  When I posted that the P-51D was the only plane you fly, it wasn't literally meant that you never use other planes; only that you use them, shall we say - rather sparingly.  If you want to get technical, you did use fighters other than the P-51D 25.3% of the time.  So from a black and white point of view, I was wrong.  From a practical point of view, I wasn't lying at all.   :angel:


i was joking when i said lier, i know what you meant  :salute.

anyway, I started using the pony about a year ago, I think.  before then my kills were almost always between spit8 and the il2.  and even then there was a lot of complains about me "flying with training wheels".  and even back then, I really didnt care what people thought about it.  I just fly because they're fun.  i switched to the ponyd because i got tired of all the fast planes getting away from my spit8.  now i target those planes which are picking others first.  then i pick everybody else  :devil.


semp
« Last Edit: February 18, 2012, 02:57:49 AM by guncrasher »
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Melvin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2797
Re: Intelligent arguments
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2012, 02:02:22 AM »
I'll bet you can run faster in reverse than I can going forward semp.

 :lol
See Rule #4

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: Intelligent arguments
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2012, 02:24:13 AM »
I'll bet you can run faster in reverse than I can going forward semp.

 :lol

 :rofl   :rofl   :rofl
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"