Civilian features In Ah 2 (likes Cars People etc..) Please Add To This

[Tracerfi]

I mean it would add some extra fun like adding a civilian point of view Is this a stupid request of not I need feed back !! I  Everyone who adds

[JunkyII]

I mean it would add some extra fun like adding a civilian point of view Is this a stupid request of not I need feed back !! I  Everyone who adds

You mean someone could be a civilian or there would be civs on the battlefield?

Maybe add cars and stuff to add obstacles to towns, somehow make it randomized for each town.

[Tracerfi]

Yeah that Could work I was implying that could add more realism to AH2 because If They Were to add a Civilian POV to the thing 

[MachFly]

Didn't all civilians typically hide in bomb shelters during an air raid?

Would be weird seeing a few 110s tacking down the town and at the same time seeing people wait in line for milk.

[JunkyII]

Didn't all civilians typically hide in bomb shelters during an air raid?

Would be weird seeing a few 110s tacking down the town and at the same time seeing people wait in line for milk.

Yea....but I still think abandoned cars/tractors would make in town tank fights funner

[MachFly]

Yea....but I still think abandoned cars/tractors would make in town tank fights funner

Maybe, but just to make it a little bit more fun HTC would need to make new towns. I don't see it happening.

Plus looking at the history of Aces High those abandoned cars would be flipping tigers. Not a good idea.

[JunkyII]

Maybe, but just to make it a little bit more fun HTC would need to make new towns. I don't see it happening.

Plus looking at the history of Aces High those abandoned cars would be flipping tigers. Not a good idea.

I don't think complete new towns would have to be added, that is something HTC would have to look at(I'm not tech savvy).

I disagree, it would create more choke points, concealment spots, possibly cover. Make a battle more interesting even if people had to negoiate obstacles on the battlefield, which they did back then and still do now in modern combat.

[MachFly]

I disagree, it would create more choke points, concealment spots, possibly cover. Make a battle more interesting even if people had to negoiate obstacles on the battlefield, which they did back then and still do now in modern combat.

I don't GV much so I can't agree or disagree.

[Tracerfi]

True But that is the Problem I need some input on people who do use GV'S Constantly

[Rich52]

Well looking at gun cam footage from USAAF Jabos you wouldnt have wanted to be a German farmer in his horse drawn wagon during '44 or '45 anywheres in the fatherland. At least during the day. Food source targets were legitimate targets and a P-47 would make mincemeat of Grandpa, his wagon, and his Clydesdale.

[thndregg]

Overall, the game centers around the WW2 vehicles of warfare, and I'm fine with that.

[MAINER]

Plus looking at the history of Aces High those abandoned cars would be flipping tigers. Not a good idea.

exactly

[Tracerfi]

OK now I see it the idea of Civilian features is not I good Idea and Thank You Guys for the Feed Back
 

[Meatwad]

No.

[icepac]

We need a pitchfork loadout and a human/chute option in the hanger.